I've just realized I made a mistake, Intrepid Ibex 8.10 "will reach" EOL
on 30 "APRIL" 2010.
Sorry for this.
Anyway, I think that one month doesn't make any difference now.
--
sysprof-module doesn't build
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272204
You received this bug notification because you are
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu. Intrepid Ibex 8.10 reached EOL on
30 March 2010.
Please see this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.
Thank you.
** Changed in: sysprof (Ubuntu Intr
** Tags added: patch
--
sysprof-module doesn't build
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listin
dget
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/sysprof/1.0.12-1/+files/sysprof_1.0.12-1.dsc
dpkg-source -x sysprof_1.0.12-1.dsc
cd sysprof-1.0.12/
dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc -us -rfakeroot
sudo dpkg -i ../sysprof_1.0.12-1_amd64.deb
../sysprof-module-source_1.0.12-1_all.deb
--
sysprof-module do
Murray: It seems the Jaunty package[1] can be built and run on Intrepid.
Just did it.
[1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/sysprof/1.0.12-1
--
sysprof-module doesn't build
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
Can't this be fixed in Intrepid? I can't see a downside to fixing a
build.
--
sysprof-module doesn't build
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@li
Even after applying the patch by Hans, it does not build on intrepid
amd64. Attached is the output of module-assistant.
** Attachment added: "sysprof-build-failure-intrepid-amd64.txt.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/2212/sysprof-build-failure-intrepid-amd64.txt.gz
--
sysprof-module does
Unsubscribing ubuntu-universe-sponsors, since there is nothing to sponsor yet.
Please create a debdiff with both patches (the new release + amd64 fix).
Preferably, it should get ACKed by upstream (e.g. through a new release).
Setting status for Intrepid back to New, for motu-sru processing.
** Ch
@ Hans de Goede
how to apply that patch?
thanks
--
sysprof-module doesn't build
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://list
I just hit the x86_64 compile problem too, here is a patch (also send
upstream).
** Attachment added: "Patch fixing sysprof kernel module not compiling on
x86_64 with 2.6.27"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19612228/sysprof-1.0.11-2.6.27-x86_64.patch
--
sysprof-module doesn't build
https://bu
With the patch from comment 7 it still does not compile for me:
│ /usr/src/modules/sysprof-module/sysprof-module.c: In
function ▒
│ ‘timer_notify’:
▒
This was fixed in jaunty by a sync from Debian.
** Changed in: sysprof (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Importance: Undecided => High
Status: New => In Progress
Target: None => intrepid-updates
** Changed in: sysprof (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Status: In Progress => Triaged
** Changed in: syspro
Updated debdiff for upgrading to the new upstream version.
sysprof 1.0.10-1 -> sysprof 1.0.11-1.
See updated bug description for discussion.
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: sysprof
+ Update according to SRU guidelines:
+
+ This bug prevents compilation of the sysprofs kernel
** Changed in: sysprof (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
sysprof-module doesn't build
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs m
A new upstream version is now available, Thank you Soren!
http://www.daimi.au.dk/~sandmann/sysprof/sysprof-1.0.11.tar.gz
I can confirm that it compiles and runs in Intrepid RC. The patch is no
longer needed for this new version.
--
sysprof-module doesn't build
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27
mail from the author:
> hey,
>
> sysprof doesn't compile with recent kernels (2.6.27 here)
>
> proc_root got removed...
>
> replacing it with NULL does work.. but I don't know anything about it..
Thanks for the report. I'll try and release a new version this
weekend.
Soren
--
sysprof-module
I didn't get a reply from the author yet. Not sure how to proceed from
there but just in case I've build a debdiff too. (My first one, please
feel free to rip it apart and reuse the pieces :).
The patch itself seems rather benign to me. Just two lines changed:
For the "create_proc_entry" line see
I wasn't sure about the procedure, but I did mailed him now... still waiting
for a reply. I'll post again once he got back to me.
Thanks for answering
--
sysprof-module doesn't build
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
Hi,
The upstream author gives a contact email address on the site. Have
you tried contacting him at that address to discuss the problem with him?
Thanks,
James
--
sysprof-module doesn't build
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Changed in: sysprof (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
sysprof-module doesn't build
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.
There is still the same error in Intrepid Beta and since the upstream
author hasn't released an update yet I've tried to get to the root of
the problem and created a patch.
The patch simply replaces the deprecated symbol proc_root with NULL
which here also means root of proc. I've used dpatch whic
21 matches
Mail list logo
