Sure!
David,
I'm currently running a build from the REVU packages in the PPA; if all
goes well you shouldn't have to copy any of the Karmic packages and our
versioning will end up being very similar to official.
Tim
--
[needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad
That's great! Please make coordination with David sugar and make good use
of the Ubuntu 389 server project team PPA. You are also now one of the
administrators so should have enough privilege to manipulate the team PPA.
After launchpad approves our team email list, communication will be
easier.
I am going to fill the ppa with at least initial packages based on the
original ones from Timothy starting tomorrow evening. At least it will
let people test them. If we get this into Debian first, then it could
get into Karmic as a merge request.
--
[needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server fo
I am currently working with upstream Debian on this...hopefully things
will progress rapidly now.
--
[needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
We have formed the Ubuntu 389 directory server team and this project now
becomes team-managed
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: Timothy Pearson (kb9vqf) => Ubuntu 389 Directory Server Team
(ubuntu-389-directory-server)
--
[needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
https://bugs.laun
I had a chat with David Sugar (I believe he is a staff member from
Canonical). He suggests us to form a dedicated team to set up and
maintain the 389 directory server.
I have just done that and now we have got a new team called "Ubuntu 389
Directory Server Team"
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-389
Hi Michele,
I sent you an Email--hopefully I can help with your packaging. You're
right, it does not make sense to be maintaining two separate versions.
Thanks!
Tim
--
[needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463
You received this bug notification
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 22:26 +, Timothy Pearson wrote:
> Hey, sorry for the lack of progress on this bug, but my servers were
> fried by a lightning-related EMP on Friday (June 19) and therefore I've
> been unable to do anything since then. ( more details are on a temporary
> website at http://a
Hey, sorry for the lack of progress on this bug, but my servers were
fried by a lightning-related EMP on Friday (June 19) and therefore I've
been unable to do anything since then. ( more details are on a temporary
website at http://apt.pearsoncomputing.net )
However, before that time, it was decid
I will try to build the Jaunty packages ASAP, but first there is a
potential REVU issue--they seem to want .orig.tar.gz files, and I need
to go through and test build from original sources. That process might
take some time, and I won't be able to get to the Jaunty packages until
that is complete.
Hey Kai-Cheung,
Sorry I wasn't more explicit, but I *did* rebuild the required libraries
from Tim's repo for jaunty. It still doesn't build properly for me. ;)
I suspect that perhaps the build-deps on the packages aren't totally
accurate, since I'm building on a fresh jaunty install inside a VM,
Graeme:
The reason why fedora-directory-server_1.2.0-2.dsc doesn't build on your
jaunty system is because it relies on many libraries (such as
libsvrcore-dev) which are also along Tim's upload.
So you really need to test build these libraries first, then after they
are built, include Tim's PPA:
Tim:
Is it possible to get packages for jaunty into your repo? I'm getting
errors trying to rebuild the packages on jaunty/amd64. It freaks out and
generates a ton of errors trying to compile this:
/bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-DBUILD_NUM=\"2009.161.2056\"
I definitely agree about introducing into Karmic. That way there'll be
some wider usage and testing before the next LTS.
--
[needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Dear Ubuntu-server and Ubuntu-desktop:
If you are also a REVU reviewer, would you please have a quick look at
the new Fedora Directory Server package for ubuntu?
Blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/fedora-directory-server-
inclusion
The Fedora Directory server is the most
Debian bug has expired
** Changed in: debian
Importance: Unknown => Undecided
** Changed in: debian
Status: Fix Released => New
** Changed in: debian
Remote watch: Debian Bug tracker #386206 => None
--
[needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
All packages are now up on REVU and are built for both Intrepid and
Karmic in my PPA.
Hopefully the approval process can now start and we can get the Fedora
Directory Server into Karmic!
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
[needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server f
Rebuild for Karmic is OK
Most packages are now available on REVU and in my PPA
A slew of new needs-packaging bugs were filed for the support packages--those
packages are also up on REVU:
Bug 382261
Bug 382263
Bug 382264
Bug 382302
Bug 382317
Bug 382320
Bug 382323
--
[needs-packaging] Fedora Di
Already packaged, built, and updated to latest, just need to test build
against Karmic and upload to REVU
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: Andrew Mitchell (ajmitch) => Timothy Pearson (kb9vqf)
--
[needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463
Y
I am currently uploading the new release to a PPA here:
https://launchpad.net/~kb9vqf/+archive/389directoryserver
Instructions will be updated shortly.
I will try to get this in to REVU as soon as PPA building is verified.
I've never actually used REVU before, so we'll see how that goes... :-)
T
Hi Tim,
FDS 1.2.0 is already out, would you please update your port to 1.2.0?
Also the next ubuntu LTS release is 10.4, which Canonical doesn't like
introduce new features in, so if we want FDS to make it into the next
LTS release, we need to get it into 9.10.
Therefore we need to submit to revu.
** Summary changed:
- Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
+ [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
--
[needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a dir
22 matches
Mail list logo
