Uploaded with the tweaked control file.
Thanks,
James
** Changed in: sugar (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
Please sync sugar 0.82.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/20
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Debian do not want to provide the sugar-activities metapackage. In the
hardy packages, this is produced by the sugar sourcepackage.
My intention is to add the metapackage back to debian's sugar package
once we have it synced - unfortunately it is a deviation but a very
minor one.
In the long
I'd also question calling it a window manager when it depends on
matchbox, but that's more something to report to Debian.
Yes, it's not a window manager, more of a platform. I have found several
minor things in Debian's packaging that can be improved, but none are
show stoppers. I'll send them
Hi Morgan,
Thanks for the information.
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 07:42 +, Morgan Collett wrote:
Debian do not want to provide the sugar-activities metapackage. In the
hardy packages, this is produced by the sugar sourcepackage.
My intention is to add the metapackage back to debian's sugar
Hi,
Is there a transition plan for the sugar-activities package?
The new package depends on python-dev instead of python-all-dev
like the old package, is this correct?
I'd also question calling it a window manager when it depends on
matchbox, but that's more something to report to Debian.
Is there a transition plan for the sugar-activities package?
Well, once we get all the current source packages in Intrepid we can fix
the metapackage.
The new package depends on python-dev instead of python-all-dev
like the old package, is this correct?
Yes, that is correct.
--
Please sync
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 23:07 +, Luke Faraone wrote:
Is there a transition plan for the sugar-activities package?
Well, once we get all the current source packages in Intrepid we can fix
the metapackage.
That's not the way we normally do things, especially when approaching
the release. I
