[Bug 278801] Re: 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression...

2009-04-08 Thread Jauder Ho
Since 8.04 is termed LTS and what a lot of people use for server OS, can someone please backport this to Heron? -- 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278801 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 278801] Re: 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression...

2009-04-08 Thread Daniel J Blueman
I hate workarounds, but until this is changed (not my decision, but a difficult/policy one), this is handy: echo 'echo cubic /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_congestion_control' /etc/rc.local -- 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278801 You received this

[Bug 278801] Re: 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression...

2009-04-08 Thread Jauder Ho
Actually, since the module is not loaded by default, I ended up putting tcp_cubic in /etc/modules and adding an entry to /etc/sysctl.conf Seems to work. -- 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278801 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 278801] Re: 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression...

2009-02-20 Thread Dan Munckton
** Changed in: ubuntu-ps3-port Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278801 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 278801] Re: 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression...

2009-02-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux-ports - 2.6.28-1.1 --- linux-ports (2.6.28-1.1) jaunty; urgency=low [ Luke Yelavich ] * SAUCE: Add rebase-ports and retag-ports scripts based on the scripts used for the lpia kernel * Remove build depends on gcc 4.1 for powerpc and

[Bug 278801] Re: 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression...

2008-10-30 Thread Mathias Burén
Is there any performance test that compares reno to cubic? -- 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278801 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 278801] Re: 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression...

2008-10-30 Thread Daniel J Blueman
You can use iperf and many other related. It's a question of testing high BDP and lossy, eg wireless networks, especially with multiple flows. There probably are a lot of tests already out there. -- 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278801 You

[Bug 278801] Re: 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression...

2008-10-28 Thread Dan Munckton
The i386 and PowerPC Intrepid ports kernels also need to be updated to use cubic: $ git grep DEFAULT_TCP_CONG config/hppa/config:CONFIG_DEFAULT_TCP_CONG=cubic config/i386/config:CONFIG_DEFAULT_TCP_CONG=reno config/ia64/config:CONFIG_DEFAULT_TCP_CONG=cubic

[Bug 278801] Re: 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression...

2008-10-28 Thread Dan Munckton
** Also affects: ubuntu-ps3-port Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ubuntu-ps3-port Importance: Undecided = Medium Status: New = Triaged -- 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278801 You received this bug

[Bug 278801] Re: 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression...

2008-10-28 Thread Michael Casadevall
Fix committed to the ubuntu-ports-jaunty branch. We can SRU the ports kernel for this as well. ** Changed in: linux-ports (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium Assignee: (unassigned) = Michael Casadevall (sonicmctails) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed Target: None =

[Bug 278801] Re: 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression...

2008-10-24 Thread Amit Kucheria
** Also affects: linux-lpia (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux-lpia (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium Assignee: (unassigned) = Amit Kucheria (amitk) Status: New = Fix Committed Target: None = ubuntu-8.10 -- 2.6.27 default TCP

[Bug 278801] Re: 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression...

2008-10-24 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux-lpia - 2.6.27-4.9 --- linux-lpia (2.6.27-4.9) intrepid; urgency=low [ Amit Kucheria ] * SAUCE: Start new release Ignore: yes * SAUCE: Add LPIA keyword in front of all our tags * SAUCE: Disable DYANMIC_FTRACE - LP: #263555 *

[Bug 278801] Re: 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression...

2008-10-14 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 2.6.27-7.11 --- linux (2.6.27-7.11) intrepid; urgency=low [ Amit Kucheria ] * STABLE queue: mac80211: fix two issues in debugfs - LP: #275227 * SAUCE: Adds support for COMPAL JHL90 webcam [ Ben Collins ] * SAUCE: (no-up) x86:

[Bug 278801] Re: 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression...

2008-10-14 Thread Daniel J Blueman
Yes, it can easily changed at runtime, but this is not the usage bug we have. All the users of Ubuntu Intrepid will get penalised by the poor scaling and unfairness of TCP Reno (using blind congestion control [1]), which is why TCP cubic was introduced and became default in 2.6.19, some 2 years

[Bug 278801] Re: 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression...

2008-10-13 Thread Tim Gardner
While cubic may be the upstream default, its unlikely that it'll change from reno this close to release. Instead, you can change it at runtime, e.g., sudo su - modprobe tcp_cubic echo cubic /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_congestion_control exit -- 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression...

[Bug 278801] Re: 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression...

2008-10-12 Thread Leann Ogasawara
Hi Daniel, I can bring this to the attention of the Ubuntu kernel team. However, with it being less than a week away from the Intrepid kernel freeze, I'm uncertain of the likelyhood of this getting resolved prior to Intrepid final and may have to wait for Jaunty. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)

[Bug 278801] Re: 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression...

2008-10-09 Thread Daniel J Blueman
What can I do to expedite this change? This is crucial particularly for high bandwidth links, which are have a higher latency-bandwidth ratio (eg xDSL, 10gigE), and particularly networks where some loss is expected (eg internet, wireless LAN). -- 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control

[Bug 278801] Re: 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression...

2008-10-08 Thread Steve Beattie
Confirmed that this is still the default in linux- image-2.6.27-6-generic-2.6.27-6.9 and that the default config for the upstream kernel is cubic. ** Tags added: bitesize ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression...

[Bug 278801] Re: 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression...

2008-10-08 Thread Steve Beattie
I do note that 2.6.24 in hardy/8.04 was still using reno by default, so this wouldn't be a potential regression in Intrepid. ** Tags removed: regression-potential -- 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278801 You received this bug notification

[Bug 278801] Re: 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression...

2008-10-06 Thread Wouter Stomp
** Tags added: regression-potential -- 2.6.27 default TCP congestion control regression... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278801 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com