[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2011-01-06 Thread Adam Porter
One problem as I see it is that the Network Manager applets/widgets should have a simple option to changed "unmanaged" devices to "managed." All it takes is for a "managed=true" line in nm-settings.conf to be changed to "managed=false" and Network Manager is stuck! The only way to fix it is to fix

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2010-06-16 Thread cwsupport
Just a quick bit of info as I saw a similar problem...which may or may not have been related on 9.10. The problem as I see it was caused by have a static ip setup on eth0 - but the network manager was 'swiping' the connection and attempting dhcp (which is not available on the particular network).

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2009-04-26 Thread Dave Jakeman
I too have a static IP address config and got hit by this problem attempting to upgrade from 8.04 to 9.04 (via 8.10). So I wiped and did a clean install of 9.04 and static IP configuration then worked fine. Not a fix for those that want to upgrade though. -- [regression] devices/interfaces not s

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2009-04-26 Thread cristian
I upgraded to Jaunty final release and the bug still persist. is someone working at this or like in intrepid the bug will persist until the next release. -- [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (har

Re: [Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2009-04-01 Thread Nausser
Really the easiest way is to just do a ip address reservation for your NIC's MAC address on your DHCP server. That way when this long drawn out bug is finally fixed, you won't have to do any special re-config of anything. On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Sat, Nov 08, 200

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2009-03-31 Thread mrbean71
I upgraded from 8.10 to 9.04 beta and network worked but plasma-network-widget showed unmanaged, I thought beacues ia had handly modified interfaces and resolv.conf. I decided to installa fresh 9.04 due the fact I was upgrading from a long time. I was very disappointd to see netork work via dhcp

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2009-01-07 Thread Ronnie Redd
Those who need a static ip Change your /etc/resolv.conf to something like below (replace the x's with ip addresses of your dns servers) with the command: sudo gedit /etc/resolv.conf #/etc/resolv.conf search yourdomain nameserver xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx nameserver xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx nameserver xxx.xxx.xxx.x

Re: [Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-12-04 Thread Alexander Sack
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 07:44:40PM -, Dave Jakeman wrote: > Just back from wiping/installing 8.10 (full) and trying to set up my > static wired connections. > > On the first attempt, I configured my connections and they were accepted > without a "read-only" error. Couldn't get onto the intern

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-28 Thread Repgahroll
Thanks Sokraates! (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/279262/comments/20) Worked like a charm! -- [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before) https://bugs.la

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-11 Thread John Rose
Network Manager is getting wirse. It now randomly does things like: offering a wireless connection when there is a wired connection (both defined as dhcp) after requesting a WPA/WPA2 key, never connecting ignoring DNS (in /etc/resolv.conf) but not allowing them in Network Manager applet not picki

Re: [Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-10 Thread Nausser
After successful connection, is anyone else here having windows based pptp vpn connection issues? Is there a specific thread for this issue in Ibex? Sorry if this is outside the realm of this thread. -Brian On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 14:53 +, Paul wrote: > Yes Martin, I did. The work-around ab

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-10 Thread Paul
Yes Martin, I did. The work-around above of deleting the existing connection and re-adding didn't work either as Network-Manager still wouldn't allow me to add a connection (no prompt for sudo access). The only fix that works is to manually edit /etc/resolv.conf to add DNS entries. Wicd nicely m

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-10 Thread Martin G Miller
Paul, you didn't look at the gui for network manager very closely, did you? Network manager does write to resolv.conf. This is how you set up for a static IP connection: Right click the icon, select "edit connections", highlight the connection you want to tweak. Click Edit and then select th

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-09 Thread Paul
The work around for this is easy. Simply edit /etc/resolv.conf so your DNS lookup server is present. Check it out... $ cat /etc/resolv.conf # Generated by NetworkManager OH LOOK IT'S BLANK. :/ I guess let's add our DNS server in /etc/resolv.conf: $ sudo vi /etc/resolv.conf $ cat /etc/resolv

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-08 Thread Dave Jakeman
Just back from wiping/installing 8.10 (full) and trying to set up my static wired connections. On the first attempt, I configured my connections and they were accepted without a "read-only" error. Couldn't get onto the internet though. Went back to check, and both connection definitions had vanis

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-08 Thread Dave Jakeman
Me too. I had two static wired interfaces before the upgrade. Tried upgrading by CD and over the net and both made my post-upgrade connections incorrectly configured and read-only. Fortunately, I took an Acronis backup before the upgrade. I have other issues (PC hangs on shutdown), so I'll try

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-06 Thread Paul
Exact same problem here. Static IP config that worked fine in 8.04, borked when 8.10 upgrade came. Can't alter using NM gui (no password prompt - says I don't have permission). Connectivity to ISP is fine, but DNS doesn't work. Example: $ ping google.com ping: unknown host google.com $ ping 6

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-06 Thread NUCO
Yes, it works fine. I can configure it from the networkmanager applet. Give it a try. -- [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279262 You received

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-06 Thread benk
@NUCO Can you use a static IP through eth0 with your new "interfaces" configuration? This is my problem. DHCP works but not static IP. -- [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before) htt

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-06 Thread NUCO
This is my old "interfaces" configuration, the one that was left after the upgrade to ibex: auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto eth2 #iface eth2 inet dhcp auto ath0 #iface ath0 inet dhcp auto wlan0 #iface wlan0 inet dhcp iface eth0 inet static address 192.168

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-06 Thread Nausser
Do you mean removing eth0? My internet connection has always worked; however, I've never had the nm-applet running in the notification area. The only way to make it show up is to run command "sudo /etc/init.d/NetworkManager restart". This puts the network manager in the notification area although i

Re: [Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-06 Thread Nausser
Do you mean removing eth0? My internet connection has always worked; however, I've never had the nm-applet running in the notification area. The only way to make it show up is to run command "sudo /etc/init.d/NetworkManager restart". This puts the network manager in the notification area although i

Re: [Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-06 Thread Claudio Satriano
@Sergiu Did you try removing the existing connection entry and create a brand new one? This worked for me. NM prompted me for the password and the new connection is now persistent (i.e. is not lost on reboot) Claudio Il giorno 06/nov/08, alle ore 11:02, Sergiu Bivol ha scritto: > Three mac

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-06 Thread Sergiu Bivol
Three machines with Intrepid here. All of them fresh installs, updated. Each of them has 3 network cards with static IPs. None of them is manageable. I randomly get any combination of these results when configuring the interfaces with network manager: - the settings are saved, but no connection

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-05 Thread benk
I think I have this bug as well. I upgraded from 8.04 to 8.10. I had a static IP wired connection under 8.04 which worked but this stopped working after upgrading to 8.10. I followed advice from messages above and set [ifupdown] managed=true In my /etc/NetworkManager/nm-system-settings.conf file

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-04 Thread Alexander Sack
please double check that this bug is actually your bug and if you are in doubt open a new one. refer to this one instead of commenting here. -- [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-04 Thread Alexander Sack
mauriceplus, this is not the place to ask question. questions here will make the bug unreadable and make it less likely that we can actually fix something here. -- [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-04 Thread imk
This bug unavoidably impacts anybody using VirtualBox to run guest VMs under Ubtuntu with Host Interface Networking (i.e. "real" networking), since this calls for the installation of bridge-utils and modification of /etc/network/interfaces with the addition of code like: auto br0 iface br0 inet dh

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-04 Thread Adam Niedling
mauriceplus: That also happened to me a few times. For example when I bought a wlan router and tried to make it work. Nothing but skype works.. Strange. -- [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hard

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-04 Thread mauriceplus
HI, I'm using Kubuntu 8.10, upgraded from 8.04. I want to confirm this bug, but I've experienced an interesting thing!! Skype works fine, I can talk with anyone, but I can't surf on internet with firefox and other programs, and apt-get doesn't work!! but WHY Skype WORKS??? Thanks a lot to all tha

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-03 Thread Alexander Sack
wont fix in intrepid. ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Intrepid) Status: Triaged => Won't Fix -- [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

Re: [Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-03 Thread Alexander Sack
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 03:50:57PM -, Martin G Miller wrote: > I think this is a different bug(s). I will start a new one for it. ok if that is because you see the devices duplicated its bug 262974 ... but i think you found it. - Alexander -- [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "a

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-03 Thread Martin G Miller
"so its a feature that they get reused for multiple devices." If I only have 1 nic and 1 connection type specified, there should only be 1 entry in the drop down list. I have another machine running Intrepid from a clean install of rc1 and it has 2 nics in it. The drop down correctly shows 2 ent

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-03 Thread Alexander Sack
sorry meant: ... that your description matches this bug ... -- [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279262 You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-03 Thread Alexander Sack
Martin, i dont think that your description is your bug. Anyway, the connections are not bound to a physical device unless you lock them by setting the HW address (MAC). so its a feature that they get reused for multiple devices. -- [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-11-03 Thread Martin G Miller
Here is some follow up. After a reboot, I have the network manager applet in the tray and it works, sort of. It was showing my DHCP entry and my static IP entry twice. It also kept defaulting to the Auto eth0 connection which is DHCP, even though I had unchecked "connect automatically" for that

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-10-31 Thread Martin G Miller
Here is the output you requested: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -la /etc/network/interfaces* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 325 2008-10-31 07:53 /etc/network/interfaces -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 537 2008-10-30 20:35 /etc/network/interfaces~ -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 496 2006-04-19 11:49 /etc/network/interfaces.dpkg-o

Re: [Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-10-31 Thread Alexander Sack
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:51:46AM -, Martin G Miller wrote: > I had only 1 nic defilned in Hardy with choices of a static IP address > and DHCP, set up with the old network manager. Here is the contents of > interfaces.dpkg-old, which I assume is my old interfaces file. There > are no blank

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-10-31 Thread Martin G Miller
I had only 1 nic defilned in Hardy with choices of a static IP address and DHCP, set up with the old network manager. Here is the contents of interfaces.dpkg-old, which I assume is my old interfaces file. There are no blank lines and only 1 static IP nic is listed. # This file describes the netw

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-10-31 Thread Alexander Sack
i am not aware of any code that would touch /etc/network/interfaces during hardy->intrepid update. How sure are you that you did not have those empty lines before? -- [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed i

Re: [Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-10-31 Thread Alexander Sack
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:32:57PM -, jOin3r wrote: > Workaround is to remove network interface from > /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules > and remove the interface from /etc/network/interfaces why remove from persistent-net.rules? removing just from interfaces should be enough. - A

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-10-30 Thread Martin G Miller
It didn't show clearly in my previous post. here is what it looked like starting with what should have been the last 2 lines of the file: # This is a list of hotpluggable network interfaces. # They will be activated automatically by the hotplug subsystem. The blank lines started here. There wer

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-10-30 Thread Martin G Miller
Here is an update. I reexamined my /etc/network/interfaces and I found a lot of blank lines that obscured the "phantom eth1 info" ***The file contents starts here # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system # and how to activate them.

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-10-30 Thread jOin3r
Workaround is to remove network interface from /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules and remove the interface from /etc/network/interfaces Reboot and enjoy network manager. -- [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-10-29 Thread Martin G Miller
Here is my syslog from today. ** Attachment added: "syslog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19055066/syslog.txt -- [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before) https://bugs.launchpa

Re: [Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-10-29 Thread Alexander Sack
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 03:18:22PM -, Martin G Miller wrote: > Since upgrading from hardy to Intrepid I have a similar issue. I had > set Hardy up with static IP and on upgrade to Intrepid, I have no nm- > applet I am online, but can't manage my nic. It gives me the read > only message ment

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-10-29 Thread Martin G Miller
Since upgrading from hardy to Intrepid I have a similar issue. I had set Hardy up with static IP and on upgrade to Intrepid, I have no nm- applet I am online, but can't manage my nic. It gives me the read only message mentioned above. Oddly, the Network Configuration shows I have 2 nics, eth0

Re: [Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-10-28 Thread Alexander Sack
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:02:11AM -, aussiebuddha wrote: > I quotes the iface line for eth0 and now it works miraculously. > hope a fix gets there before intrepid is out. > > laptop:~$ cat /etc/network/interfaces > auto lo > iface lo inet loopback > auto eth0 > #iface eth0 inet dhcp > thats

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-10-28 Thread aussiebuddha
I quotes the iface line for eth0 and now it works miraculously. hope a fix gets there before intrepid is out. laptop:~$ cat /etc/network/interfaces auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto eth0 #iface eth0 inet dhcp -- [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-10-23 Thread Steve Langasek
Thanks for the cogent summary, Alexander. Questions: - Is a fix available? (Can you post it to the bug?) - Under what circumstances will a user have an /etc/network/interfaces with no 'auto' lines like this, that they want NM to manage? Will a user ever have such a config as a result of Ubuntu

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-10-23 Thread Alexander Sack
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Intrepid) Target: ubuntu-8.10 => None -- [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279262 You received thi

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-10-23 Thread Alexander Sack
** Description changed: the regression here is that devices are unmanaged even though they dont have a "auto eth0" line in /etc/network/interfaces Here an example of an interfaces configuration that should not set the devices in unmanaged mode https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+s

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-10-23 Thread Alexander Sack
ubuntu-release: please decide whether we can get this this in intrepid. ** Description changed: the regression here is that devices are unmanaged even though they dont have a "auto eth0" line in /etc/network/interfaces Here an example of an interfaces configuration that should not set th

[Bug 279262] Re: [regression] devices/interfaces not set to "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces get blacklisted in 0.7 (intrepid) but were managed in 0.6 (hardy and before)

2008-10-22 Thread Alexander Sack
** Description changed: the regression here is that devices are unmanaged even though they dont have a "auto eth0" line in /etc/network/interfaces Here an example of an interfaces configuration that should not set the devices in unmanaged mode https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+s