[Bug 28479] Re: firefox32 for amd64 = support 32-bit plugins on amd64

2008-11-10 Thread Jarl
I completely agree with Mahdi and Alexandre. Firefox 32bit on AMD64 is a must have for ubuntu being a user-freindly experience. Please live up to the Kubuntu slogan Linux for human beings. I am a convert from SuSE and I am quite disappointed with the lack of firefox 32bit on amd64 in (k)ubuntu.

[Bug 28479] Re: firefox32 for amd64 = support 32-bit plugins on amd64

2008-07-31 Thread Ramesh Dharan
Agreed with Mahdi, icedtea simply doesn't cut it for Java, and nspluginwrapper is unfortunately still quite broken in Hardy. It stops working after about 10 minutes, or anytime you have multiple tabs open using Flash simultaneously. Just take a look at how many views and questions there are on

[Bug 28479] Re: firefox32 for amd64 = support 32-bit plugins on amd64

2008-07-31 Thread Ramesh Dharan
Agreed with Mahdi, icedtea simply doesn't cut it for Java, and nspluginwrapper is unfortunately still quite broken in Hardy. It stops working after about 10 minutes, or anytime you have multiple tabs open using Flash simultaneously. Just take a look at how many views and questions there are on

[Bug 28479] Re: firefox32 for amd64 = support 32-bit plugins on amd64

2008-07-31 Thread Ramesh Dharan
There are actually *73* open bugs in LaunchPad for nspluginwrapper: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/+bugs?field.searchtext=nspluginwrappersearch=Search+Bug+Reportsfield.scope=allfield.scope.target= How much longer are you guys going to keep pretending that it works? -- firefox32 for amd64 =

[Bug 28479] Re: firefox32 for amd64 = support 32-bit plugins on amd64

2008-04-21 Thread Mahdi
I'm sorry to bump this one again, but ffox32 is really a must-have. Icedtea java7 plugin does not satisfy all users yet. Home banking authentication, for example, does not work (https://www2.bancobrasil.com.br/aapf/login.jsp?aapf.IDH=sim , for example. The virtual keyboard load and works, but

[Bug 28479] Re: firefox32 for amd64 = support 32-bit plugins on amd64

2007-11-06 Thread Alexander Sack
please stop bumping the bug status. This is wont fix. We have icedtea- java7 now in gutsy. Use that one as its basically suns java. The plugin works well, so this thing is actually resolved for all major use cases: flash + java. ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix

[Bug 28479] Re: firefox32 for amd64 = support 32-bit plugins on amd64

2007-10-22 Thread Danson Joseph
How difficult is it to provide a 32bit firefox installation packaged for amd64. It's not even that nswrapper doesn't support *all* plugins, it doesn't support one major one: JAVA Just build a firefox installation as 32bit for 64bit systems, even as an optional package!!! OR, write a replacement

[Bug 28479] Re: firefox32 for amd64 = support 32-bit plugins on amd64

2007-10-22 Thread Danson Joseph
It's pointless providing an incomplete system. Systems like LTSP servers with more than 4GB ram can't run 32bit ubuntu. So they cannot be crippled by not having a FULLY functional web browser in an environment that does support 4+GB ram. It's also not realistic to ask people to open a shell and

[Bug 28479] Re: firefox32 for amd64 = support 32-bit plugins on amd64

2007-08-02 Thread MariuszS
I need firefox32 too, I dont want to use things like old swiftfox 2.0.4 32bit or Fedora Core 7, only because someone wont fix this. -- firefox32 for amd64 = support 32-bit plugins on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/28479 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 28479] Re: firefox32 for amd64 = support 32-bit plugins on amd64

2007-08-02 Thread Alexandre Otto Strube
See, there is people interested. This bug had one year and a half when it was simply ignored as we won't fix it. Perhaps a look at what people want - or need - wouldn't be bad. -- firefox32 for amd64 = support 32-bit plugins on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/28479 You received this bug

[Bug 28479] Re: firefox32 for amd64 = support 32-bit plugins on amd64

2007-07-30 Thread Alexander Sack
we have nspluginwrapper ... everything else we most likely won't do. ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Won't Fix -- firefox32 for amd64 = support 32-bit plugins on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/28479 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 28479] Re: firefox32 for amd64 = support 32-bit plugins on amd64

2007-07-30 Thread Alexandre Otto Strube
The nane of the bug is support 32-bit plugins. As it's stated on the other comments, it's a work in progress, with the nspluginwrapper. When it's working, the bug must be close, right? I see no point in putting a wontfix right now just to decrease the bug count. ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)

[Bug 28479] Re: firefox32 for amd64 = support 32-bit plugins on amd64

2007-07-30 Thread John Vivirito
nspluginwrapper has been released to gutsy. Marking as invalid due to it already being in the archives. ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Invalid -- firefox32 for amd64 = support 32-bit plugins on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/28479 You received this bug

[Bug 28479] Re: firefox32 for amd64 = support 32-bit plugins on amd64

2007-07-30 Thread Alexander Sack
nspluginwrapper does not support *all* plugins ... which is why this is only partially fixed. To support every 32-bit plugin we would need to ship 32 bit firefox, which is 'Won't fix' ... ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Won't Fix -- firefox32 for amd64 = support 32-bit

[Bug 28479] Re: firefox32 for amd64 = support 32-bit plugins on amd64

2007-06-12 Thread Alexander Sack
this is now work in progress. ** Summary changed: - firefox32 for amd64 + firefox32 for amd64 = support 32-bit plugins on amd64 ** Description changed: - It is a known fact that amd64's firefox cannot run 32bits plugins, being - the most notable ones macromedia flash and java. -