[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2012-05-23 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: firefox Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286366 Title: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-12-18 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: firefox Status: New => Confirmed -- segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286366 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.co

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-12-17 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Ok. So quite a while ago I went to some large efforts to reproduce my crash with no extensions enabled and provided the backtraces and nothing has been done with it yet. C'mon, I held up my end of the bargain and lived through the pain of firefox with no extensions and crashing all the time. Can

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-11-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
OK. So here we are... all extensions disabled and another segfault: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0xb7ddb6c0 (LWP 21047)] GCGraphBuilder::AddNode (this=0xbfeb05dc, s=0x9bcbda0, aParticipant=0x8e0f39c) at nsCycleCollector.cpp:1287 1287nsCycleColl

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-11-08 Thread Brian J. Murrell
FWIW, I have now disabled all of my extensions. I will try to use and be productive without them. I have a gdb camped on the firefox process just waiting for something interesting to happen. Given that I have had to start a brand new session with none of my dozen or two tabs open, it might take

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-11-08 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Well, its been 5 days and I have not seen you comment in the bugzilla bug yet so I will follow-up here. Is there not some more scientific way to attack this problem than stabbing in the dark at enabling and disabling plugins and extensions (and making firefox unusable) until we find the one causin

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-11-03 Thread Alexander Sack
ok thanks. we need to find someone else to reproduce this then i guess. but lets continue all discussion in bugzilla ... where this issue needs to be dealt with in the first place. -- segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286366 You received this bug notification bec

Re: [Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-11-03 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 21:31 +, Alexander Sack wrote: > ok oversaw that you said that you had everything disabled all > extensions. please check that this is not flash then and uninstall that > temporarily. Flash was my first suspect and I ran with that un-installed for a while too and saw the

Re: [Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-11-03 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 21:29 +, Alexander Sack wrote: > hey, we try to track down a bug here and not start fundamental debats. I'm not trying to start any debates, just tell you what problems I have with the process of trying to find this bug. The bottom line is that it takes a while for FF3 t

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-11-02 Thread Alexander Sack
ok oversaw that you said that you had everything disabled all extensions. please check that this is not flash then and uninstall that temporarily. -- segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286366 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bu

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-11-02 Thread Alexander Sack
hey, we try to track down a bug here and not start fundamental debats. just do what i say for testing. what you do before and after that is your thing ;). -- segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286366 You received this bug notification because you are a member of U

Re: [Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-11-02 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 17:28 +, Alexander Sack wrote: > tabmix and resizable textarea are probably good candidates. Disabling tabmix renders FF3 useless for me as it is the only thing that returns me to productivity quickly when FF3 crashes, which it is doing many times a day. If I had to try

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-11-02 Thread Alexander Sack
tabmix and resizable textarea are probably good candidates. -- segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286366 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun

Re: [Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-11-02 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 14:10 +, Alexander Sack wrote: > do you have any website that regularaly triggers this? No, it's not a per-website thing. Looking at the stack traces, it appears to be garbage collection to me. I tend to think garbage collection happens more based on needs than particul

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-11-02 Thread Alexander Sack
do you have any website that regularaly triggers this? Have you checked that this is not caused by an extension? try to disable them. Also plugins. -- segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286366 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu B

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-11-02 Thread Alexander Sack
** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium Status: Incomplete => Triaged -- segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286366 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-10-28 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Here's another. Boy it's going to be fun times if Intrepid is released with this bug still in it given how often it hits me. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0xb7cb36c0 (LWP 18297)] GCGraphBuilder::AddNode (this=0xbfa86fec, s=0xf8a3140, aParticipant=0xb7bc

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-10-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Here's another with a full backtrace: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0xb7ccd6c0 (LWP 20164)] GCGraphBuilder::AddNode (this=0xbfba390c, s=0xa152c28, aParticipant=0xb7bdcd00) at nsCycleCollector.cpp:1287 1287nsCycleCollector.cpp: No such file or dir

Re: [Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-10-23 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 08:40 +, Alexander Sack wrote: > is this still a problem with the latest ffox 3? Absolutely. It's been happening many times a day as recent as yesterday. > If so, can you provide > reliable step by step instructions to reproduce? Nope. I'm afraid I can't provoke it in

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-10-23 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: firefox Status: Unknown => New -- segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286366 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-10-23 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #460916 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460916 ** Also affects: firefox via https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460916 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode https://bugs.launchpad.net/

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-10-23 Thread Alexander Sack
is this still a problem with the latest ffox 3? If so, can you provide reliable step by step instructions to reproduce? In any case, this is best dealt upstream as its not a ubuntu specific issue. Please search in bugzilla.mozilla.org to ensure that your bug isnt filed; then open a bug in bugzilla

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-10-22 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Another: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0xb7c7b6c0 (LWP 30529)] GCGraphBuilder::AddNode (this=0xbf85070c, s=0xb113b80, aParticipant=0x8aecd14) at nsCycleCollector.cpp:1287 1287nsCycleCollector.cpp: No such file or directory. in nsCycleColl

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-10-20 Thread Brian J. Murrell
For posterity, another: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0xb7d406c0 (LWP 22826)] GCGraphBuilder::AddNode (this=0xbf813e5c, s=0xa2a5540, aParticipant=0x8dc53f4) at nsCycleCollector.cpp:1287 1287nsCycleCollector.cpp: No such file or directory.

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-10-20 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Not at will. It happens fairly frequently though. Several times a day. Here's another one: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0xb7de66c0 (LWP 14458)] GCGraphBuilder::AddNode (this=0xbfcb98ac, s=0xb04b8268, aParticipant=0x98a5c84) at nsCycleCollector.cpp

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-10-20 Thread Alexander Sack
do you have a way to reproduce this? ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286366 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --