We added a mozjs source in natty which provides libmozjs185-1.0.
** Package changed: xulrunner-1.9.2 (Ubuntu) = mozjs (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: mozjs (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Excerpts from Micah Gersten's message of Sun May 22 16:52:47 UTC 2011:
We added a mozjs source in natty which provides libmozjs185-1.0.
*WOOT!*
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286906
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #618381
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=618381
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286906
Title:
provide and support a top-level
What is it about Debian's strategy that is 'right'? Are they simply
packing up successive versions under different package names that can be
installed in parallel, and killing off versions as soon as practical?
What in the world do they do for maintenance? Cherry-picking patches
from modern
** Changed in: xulrunner
Importance: Unknown = Medium
--
provide and support a top-level library package for libmozjs (Was: Unable to
use libmozjs.so in an application, because of library path problem.)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286906
You received this bug notification because you are
Hi, this bug is also affecting freewrl (see url at bottom)
I am about to package it for debian but can't be run on lucid (unless i use a
rpath workaround) ...
Please build upgraded version of libmozjs-dev , if possible.
For info :
apt-cache rdepends libmozjs-dev
libmozjs-dev
Reverse Depends:
Moving to xulrunner-1.9.2 since 1.9.1 is no longer in the devel release.
** Package changed: xulrunner-1.9.1 (Ubuntu) = xulrunner-1.9.2 (Ubuntu)
--
provide and support a top-level library package for libmozjs (Was: Unable to
use libmozjs.so in an application, because of library path problem.)
This prevents people from building gxine, or at least makes it
unnecessarily hard.
libmozjs0d is old and should long since have been replaced with
libmozjs2d (and the corresponding libmozjs-dev), built from xulrunner
1.9.*. Debian has this right…
--
provide and support a top-level library
Bug #418762 was marked as a duplicate of this bug.
What can be done to remove the X11 requirements of xulrunner-1.9,
particularly in regard to CouchDB's dependency? CouchDB is desirable on
server installations (such as systems running chef-server, which uses
CouchDB as a storage engine), and X11
Hi,
judging from the upstream bug looks like it is not going to happen, would it be
possible to ship libmozjs plus the soname like e.g. what is being done in
debian? (libmozjs2d for xulrunner 1.9.1)
thanks
--
provide and support a top-level library package for libmozjs (Was: Unable to
use
Moving to xulrunner-1.9.1
We now have an upstream request for this.
** Summary changed:
- Unable to use libmozjs.so in an application, because of library path problem.
+ provide and support a top-level library package for libmozjs (Was: Unable to
use libmozjs.so in an application, because of
11 matches
Mail list logo
