This bug was fixed in the package conky - 1.7.2-0ubuntu1
---
conky (1.7.2-0ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low
* New upstream release:
- Improved Lua API (lua_read_parse has been removed in favour of the
conky_parse() Lua API call).
- Cairo and Imlib2 bindings for Lua.
-
There are pre-release jaunty packages in
https://launchpad.net/~norsetto/+archive/ppa available for testing.
Feel free to raise eventual bugs here in Launchpad or upstream
(http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=143975&atid=757308, non-packaging
bugs only obviously).
PS. In case anyone is int
** Changed in: conky (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed
--
nvidia support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
h
Awesome, thank you for your work!
--
nvidia support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinf
In preparation for the next release, I'm planning to have 3 binary
packages: conky-cli, conky and conky-full.
conky-cli should be a basic package to be used in servers or piped with dzen2.
I plan to includes the following support:
MPD, MOC, math, portmon, ALSA mixer, apcupsd
conky should be a go
As is, we have today enough changes in our package that we would have to merge
anyhow from Debian, so, an additional build-dep its not a big deal (this means,
reason #2 is not valid anymore).
However, I'm still not convinced that we should enable this at compilation time
since it could really be
I don't get it... isn't software supposed to make our lives simpler?
Should we take out hddtemp support because the users who really want it can
compile it themselves? The hddtemp tool can report the temperature to Conky
fine aswell, without the builtin function.
@Colin Kelly: no related dev has
I'm going to side with the devs on this one, I don't think it should be
enabled by default for all the reasons mentioned previously. Users that
really want it can compile it themselves. Aditionally, the restricted
binary driver can report temps and other data to conky just fine without
the option
I don't want to sound respectless, because I greatly value the work of
the devs here... but Cesare, I pretty much disagree with you.
1. Not all users have temperature sensors in their hard drives, and not all
users with such sensors want to read the temperature. Should we disable the
hddtemp var
I'm against implemeting this for two reasons:
1, Not all users have nvidia cards, and not all nvidia card users may
want to use this. Enabling this during compilation will increase the
executable size and perhaps have some undesidered side effects too.
2. We would loose our sync from Debian, whic
** Changed in: conky (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
nvidia support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:/
11 matches
Mail list logo
