Lol, almost 2 years. Talk about hive mind efficiency.
--
in trash: show delete-date
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:/
** Changed in: nautilus
Importance: Unknown => Wishlist
--
in trash: show delete-date
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
ht
This bug was fixed in the package nautilus - 1:2.31.6-0ubuntu1
---
nautilus (1:2.31.6-0ubuntu1) maverick; urgency=low
* New upstream version:
- This release is based on 2.30.1
- Expand and collapse folders with +/- in list view
- Rename .desktop files also change their n
I had tried that before and ran is problems with dependencies and stuff, and I
know to use
the CLI for basic stuffs only. I guess I'll have to wait till someone packages
it into some
repo. Its been a long time I've been waiting for this patch.
Thanks again,
--
in trash: show delete-date
At the moment the change is not even released upstream (just 4 days old
in git master), but if you know how to patch packages, you could apply
the 7 commits at http://git.gnome.org/browse/nautilus/log/, beginning
with the one from Marcus Carlson ("Adds Trashed On and Original Location
as columns in
Thanks for the info. I'm on Karmic and so is there any way I can
find any non-canonical repo with the patched version?
--
in trash: show delete-date
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
@Sancho: It will be available in the first development version of Ubuntu
10.10. It's unlikely that it will be fixed for 10.04, too, since it's a
feature request and nothing "important".
--
in trash: show delete-date
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552
You received this bug notification becaus
Approx. when can we hope to find this patched version in the repos? And
for which Ubuntu versions?
Thanks,
--
in trash: show delete-date
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-
Fixed upstream
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
in trash: show delete-date
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
u
** Changed in: nautilus
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
in trash: show delete-date
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.
Marcus, its the first patch I've ever had to do, hence why I wasn't sure on the
correct formatting etc.
Upon running it, I get this:
# Patch 10_nautilus_trash_columns_arrange.patch does not apply (enforce with -f)
# make: *** [debian/stamp-patched] Error 1
# dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rule
Neil, not sure what you mean - but all the code in the patch is necessary. I
just tried the patch against the latest 2.29.1 release and it seems to apply
nicely (I cannot test to compile it atm).
About the formatting; I hope it's standard nautilus formatting :) - in case not
- please tell me wha
Thanks Marcus. One last thing, is it all that code to go into a .patch file? Or
only parts of it? I've looked at the current patch files in the
nautilus-source, and none of them have the same or even similar file formatting.
In case you were wondering, yes I am a long time reader, first time writ
Neil, yep that would be it. I'm not sure if it will apply cleanly
against 2.29 - but you're welcome to update it if its not ;)
--
in trash: show delete-date
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
Markus, where can I find "nautilus_trash_columns_arrange.patch" in order to
attempt to compile nautilus myself?
Does comment 24 from here: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89706
have the patch I'm looking for?
-Neil
--
in trash: show delete-date
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30155
@ Marcus: Is there a repository that you are aware of that hosts the patched
nautilus? I checked yours,
but wasnt sure if it was the one I was looking for.
Thanks for all your efforts!
--
in trash: show delete-date
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552
You received this bug notification becau
@ Marcus: No, I'm running Jaunty. I realise it was bcos I have a modded
libcairo that I need to fix a firefox bug.
But even after I fixed that issue, I had problems with the patch not being
applied despite
using various prefixes from 05-20 for the patch file.
--
in trash: show delete-date
http
Sancho Panza, it's probably because you're running karmic and got
unlucky. Wait a few days and then try again and the repo is probably in
a good state.
--
in trash: show delete-date
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
I could not go beyond
"# apt-get build-dep nautilus "
due to error "E: Build-dependencies for nautilus could not be satisfied."
I tried fixing it using some development libraries like gtk etc., but
got drawn deeper into dependency hell.
--
in trash: show delete-date
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
Sancho, np ;-) but if you wanna try it out anyway here's a quick guide
to let you patch nautilus manually (actually, most of this can be used
for other packages as well).
Create a directory to put your packages in, such as ~/mypackages/
# mkdir mypackages && cd mypackages
Get the source for nauti
:D Sorry I didnt fully get you. The only way I can afford is by adding/enabling
a repository in synaptic and letting the system take care of the
conflicts/dependencies. Is there anyway I can do that in this situation?
I cannot risk messing too much with my system as this is the only one I have
Sancho Panza, patch added to upstream bugreport - feel free to try it
out :)
--
in trash: show delete-date
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@l
Thanks for the effort. Let us know if there is anything we can do.
FYI...I'm a non-programmer, but can help with some testing if needed.
Cheers,
--
in trash: show delete-date
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
I've made some progress. At least the date shows up the in the column.
Next I'll have to figure out how to only show this column when in
trash:///
** Attachment added: "WIP"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31759573/trash-deleted.png
--
in trash: show delete-date
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
Holger Berndt has already implemented the date and time deleted feature>
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/95853/comments/56
But has not replied to requests to submit the patch here or upstream!
Anyone interested in this feature can try to contact him via the launchpad
cont
Thanks for the prompt response Pedro. It would help if you clarify my next
logical question:
How is one supposed to use the Trash feature in ubuntu? Is it currently meant
only for the purpose of
immediate (NOT short/long term) retrieval of deleted files? Because I cannot
currently empty
the tras
The bug is being tracked at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89706 you can always propose a
patch in order to fix this if you think it would not take too long to do
a patch for it, the Ubuntu team doesn't have the resources to work on a
feature request like this one for now, you might want
A similar bug has been fixed in KDE/Kubuntu and is discussed here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/228369
Using all the links to code above and the Kubuntu bugfix, it doesnt seem like
fixing this bug in Ubuntu/Nautilus
should take too long for a programmer (unfortunately I'm not, so mayb
And some more here: http://code.google.com/p/trash-cli/
--
in trash: show delete-date
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https
Some updates here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1178917
--
in trash: show delete-date
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun
Sancho, no need to justify the change proposed by this bug report -- it
looks like it is already triaged in Nautilus. Marking it as invalid
within hundredpapercuts, and commenting that it is not a paper cut, in
no way addresses whether or not the bug is valid or affects the
usability of Ubuntu; in
I cannot comment on whether this is trivially fixable or not, but as an
end user I find the Trash feature practically useless if I cannot clean
out large quantities of trash (automatically or manually) periodically.
Knowing the delete date is vital to achieving this (and is not a feature
request, b
This is a feature request, not a trivially fixable usability issue;
therefore, it is not a paper cut.
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: New => Invalid
--
in trash: show delete-date
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Related (not duplicates) bugs are https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150112 and
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228369
These are functionality that is necessary when a user runs low on diskspace.
A user cannot decide which files are to be emptied from the trash (automatically
or manually) unless the
** Changed in: nautilus
Status: Unknown => Confirmed
--
in trash: show delete-date
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
h
** Changed in: nautilus
Bugwatch: GNOME Bug Tracker #562156 => GNOME Bug Tracker #89706
--
in trash: show delete-date
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing li
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
in trash: show delete-date
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu
thanks for taking care of the wording, the forwarding and everything - I'm not
so good at using launchpad, have to admit it.. Something I should have
mentioned maybe in the first post: it's a functionality I've been used to from
using windows xp
(so probably that's why it felt like a bug to me,
Forwarded upstream and linked here.
** Changed in: nautilus
Importance: Undecided => Unknown
Bugwatch: None => GNOME Bug Tracker #562156
Status: New => Unknown
--
in trash: show delete-date
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552
You received this bug notification because you are
please feel free to forward this report to bugzilla.gnome.org for
forwarding instructions have a look to
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Upstream/GNOME ; thanks in advance.
** Also affects: nautilus
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassign
that's an upstream request and should be opened on bugzilla.gnome.org
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
in trash: show delete-date
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19896691/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19896693/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19896694/ProcStatus.txt
--
in tra
42 matches
Mail list logo
