If you think the packaging is better, please go ahead and do so. I
won't.
--
New upstream version available (1.2.1)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306399
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
While I appreciate the work you did on the original package, xvidcore
has been traditionally merged into Ubuntu from debian-multimedia.org:
http://debian-multimedia.org/pool/main/x/xvidcore/
Perhaps you could prepare a debdiff for its version 1.2.1-0.0?
--
New upstream version available (1.2.1)
Package is now ready, test builds for rdepends are at
https://launchpad.net/~loic-martin3/+archive/xvid
Avidemux, mplayer (and for lpia mythtv) FTBFS are not due to this new version
of xvidcore:
- they fail to build on default Karmic too (see
https://launchpad.net/~loic-martin3/+archive/fail);
-
xvidcore (2:1.2.1-0ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low
* New upstream release (LP: #306399);
* [debian/control]:
- change dependency from yasm to nasm (can be reverted once we package
xvid 1.3+);
- bump Standards-Version to 3.8.0;
- bump debhelper to 5;
- add myself as uploader
** Changed in: xvidcore (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: xvidcore (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Loïc Martin (loic-martin3)
** Attachment removed: "xvidcore_1.2.1-0.1ubuntu1.diff.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20622398/xvidcore_1.2.1-0.1ubuntu1.diff.gz
**
ok, thank, unsubsribing motu-release.
--
New upstream version available (1.2.1)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306399
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://list
Hi Stefan,
As long as I dropped the Beta freeze deadline, I should have stopped the
request for FF ;)
I still have two packages failing to build with xvid 1.2.1 libs locally
(the same that didn't build on my ppa), and I still don't have
broadband, so it's hard to troubleshoot it at the moment.
Y
any news on this one? If you can't get to it soon, I guess it'll be too
late for jaunty.
--
New upstream version available (1.2.1)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306399
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mai
I've been moving the past few days (that was a really short notice and
unexpected), and am still in the process of unpacking things ;)
The packaging I've submited in the diff.gz on 19/02 isn't satisfying,
after having done what people advised in their answers I noticed the
simlinks aren't created
Did it get posted to a PPA yet with the rdepends? Would like to test it
before agreeing.
--
New upstream version available (1.2.1)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306399
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs ma
LoIc, Mario: any news on this?
** Changed in: xvidcore (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
New upstream version available (1.2.1)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306399
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ub
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:47:32 - StefanPotyra
wrote:
> but I'd also like to ask input from Mario (as mythtv is one of
>the consumers of xvidcore)
>
Good point. Yes, please.
--
New upstream version available (1.2.1)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306399
You received this bug notification bec
ack from me
--
New upstream version available (1.2.1)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306399
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listi
I would much prefer to see some builds on a PPA of the rdepends
(including mythtv) before agreeing to this. That would also give us an
opportunity to verify no regressions have come up properly instead of
just "Yeah... it should work"
--
New upstream version available (1.2.1)
https://bugs.launch
@Mario: Any opinion on xvidcore?
--
New upstream version available (1.2.1)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306399
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubu
Have you checked rebuilding the rdepends yet?
Also, can you please attach a diff of the symbols of libxvidcore4?
Generally, in case there's no ABI breakage, it's ok to bring this in
*now*, but I'd also like to ask input from Mario (as mythtv is one of
the consumers of xvidcore)
--
New upstream v
Scott Kitterman:
I tested encoding with mencoder on both i386 and amd64 Jaunty, and checked
there was no speed regression (it's actually slightly better on amd64) which
was the reason I didn't want to upload the diff.gz on Monday. Sadly it took
longer than I expected to solve the regression.
--
Here is a working and tested diff.gz:. No regressions for speed, asm
enabled on both i386 and amd64 this time. Package has been tested in
Jaunty i386 and amd64, packages are also on my ppa at
https://launchpad.net/~loic-martin3/+archive/ppa
xvidcore (2:1.2.1-0ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low
* FFe
Here is a working and tested diff.gz:. No regressions for speed, asm
enabled on both i386 and amd64 this time. Package has been tested in
Jaunty i386 and amd64, packages are also on my ppa at
https://launchpad.net/~loic-martin3/+archive/ppa
xvidcore (2:1.2.1-0ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low
* New
I've got working packages, they're at my ppa for Jaunty and Intrepid. I'm not
uploading the diff.gz now because amd64 packages show about 40% decrease in
performance compared to 1.1.2 packages in Ubuntu's repositories (timed
conversion of StopMotionUbuntu.ogv (in the Free Culture Showcase) is at
** Changed in: xvidcore (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Loïc Martin (loic-martin3)
Status: New => In Progress
--
New upstream version available (1.2.1)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306399
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
The last version had problems with ./configure. Here is the new one.
** Attachment added: "xvidcore_1.2.1-0.1ubuntu1.diff.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20626208/xvidcore_1.2.1-0.1ubuntu1.diff.gz
--
New upstream version available (1.2.1)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306399
You received
Hello!
I've made the updated package. It's my first attempt to build something for
Ubuntu, so I'm not sure if I did everything right. but anyway here it is:
Original tarball: http://downloads.xvid.org/downloads/xvidcore-1.2.1.tar.gz
Diff file attached.
** Attachment added: "xvidcore_1.2.1-0.1ubun
23 matches
Mail list logo
