[Bug 306630] Re: nautilus should copy/move smarter (queue files)

2016-10-26 Thread Sylvain Viart
Same demand on XFCE with Thunar : https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12123 ** Bug watch added: Xfce Bugzilla #12123 https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12123 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bug

[Bug 306630] Re: nautilus should copy/move smarter (queue files)

2011-01-10 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: nautilus Status: Unknown => Confirmed ** Changed in: nautilus Importance: Unknown => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306630 Title: nautilus should co

[Bug 306630] Re: nautilus should copy/move smarter (queue files)

2011-01-10 Thread Omer Akram
upstream bug marked as duplicate of https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124783 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #124783 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124783 ** Changed in: nautilus Importance: Medium => Unknown ** Changed in: nautilus Remote watch: GNOME Bug Track

[Bug 306630] Re: nautilus should copy/move smarter (queue files)

2011-01-10 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: nautilus Status: New => Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306630 Title: nautilus should copy/move smarter (queue files) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu

[Bug 306630] Re: nautilus should copy/move smarter (queue files)

2010-11-08 Thread Gustavo Acuña
my 2 cents, what about this? Every copy operation initiated (after the first one) starts in a paused state (its queued), so you see the list of copying operations (or pending ones), but you put a play/pause button next to each operation, so in the standard case everything gets queued, but you pres

[Bug 306630] Re: nautilus should copy/move smarter (queue files)

2010-10-06 Thread Volodymyr Paprotski
It does not have to be complicated actually. I think a workable rule is to queue local files and parallel queue any network file systems. The decision should really come from the gvfs-backends daemon on case by case basis. Well actually, I have no idea how hard that is to implement, so maybe it is

[Bug 306630] Re: nautilus should copy/move smarter (queue files)

2010-09-15 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: nautilus Status: Unknown => New ** Changed in: nautilus Importance: Unknown => Medium -- nautilus should copy/move smarter (queue files) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306630 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 306630] Re: nautilus should copy/move smarter (queue files)

2010-08-07 Thread JPM
/me wants a port of TeraCopy in Ubuntu. I will settle with a pause function in Nautilus copy too. Then at least I can queue the copy's myself. -- nautilus should copy/move smarter (queue files) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306630 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

Re: [Bug 306630] Re: nautilus should copy/move smarter (queue files)

2010-05-13 Thread Darshaka Pathirana
On 05/13/2010 02:58 PM, Holger Berndt wrote: > @Darshaka Pathirana: > How can you "full ACK" a statement that you oppose in your very next > sentence? Walter proposed to ALWAYS queue files, which is definitely > not a good idea. "Do something more than just always process in > parallel or always qu

[Bug 306630] Re: nautilus should copy/move smarter (queue files)

2010-05-13 Thread Holger Berndt
@Darshaka Pathirana: How can you "full ACK" a statement that you oppose in your very next sentence? Walter proposed to ALWAYS queue files, which is definitely not a good idea. "Do something more than just always process in parallel or always queue", be it to ask the user, have some smart logic o

Re: [Bug 306630] Re: nautilus should copy/move smarter (queue files)

2010-05-13 Thread Darshaka Pathirana
On 05/13/2010 01:56 PM, Holger Berndt wrote: > @Walter_I > In my oppinion, David Siegel's remark is absolutely correct, and you > are wrong. It's not as simple as you put it. Whether or not copying > in parallel takes significantly longer depends on a number of > factors (is target and/or source on

[Bug 306630] Re: nautilus should copy/move smarter (queue files)

2010-05-13 Thread Holger Berndt
@Walter_I In my oppinion, David Siegel's remark is absolutely correct, and you are wrong. It's not as simple as you put it. Whether or not copying in parallel takes significantly longer depends on a number of factors (is target and/or source on a slow network connection, am I copying from a CD o

[Bug 306630] Re: nautilus should copy/move smarter (queue files)

2010-05-13 Thread Walter_I
Hello, I would like to add 2 cents to this thread: 1) The remark made by "David Siegel" is incorrect. The request is *not* to implement: <>, but simply to queue the files to copy so that they're copied sequentially. If I select 2 files and drag them across two "locations", these two files will be

[Bug 306630] Re: nautilus should copy/move smarter (queue files)

2009-12-15 Thread Martin Mai
Reassigning to match the product of the upstream bug. ** Also affects: nautilus via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413748 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: gvfs Importance: Unknown => Undecided ** Changed in: gvfs Remote watch: GNOME Bug Tracker #413