Hardy has seen the end of its life and is no longer receiving any
updates. Marking the Hardy task for this ticket as "Won't Fix".
** Changed in: ltsp (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
Intrepid Ibex reached end-of-life on 30 April 2010 so I am closing the
report. The bug has been fixed in newer releases of Ubuntu.
** Changed in: ltsp (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
ltsp-client: attempted to send on closed socket
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310250
OK. Thank you very much!
--
ltsp-client: attempted to send on closed socket
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310250
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ub
nominated and confirmed for hardy
** Changed in: ltsp (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
ltsp-client: attempted to send on closed socket
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310250
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
nominated and confirmed for intrepid (if someone finds the time for an
SRU)
** Changed in: ltsp (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
ltsp-client: attempted to send on closed socket
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310250
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Changed in: ltsp (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: ltsp (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Rubeosis (faspie)
--
ltsp-client: attempted to send on closed socket
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310250
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
Sorry, I did not remember that I reported the bug as nbd-bug. Could you
please move it to the ltsp section. I don't know how to do that...
--
ltsp-client: attempted to send on closed socket
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310250
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
this was fixed in ltsp-5.1.25 (upstram commit 879
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ltsp-upstream/ltsp/ltsp-trunk/revision/879)
** Changed in: ltsp (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Rubeosis (faspie) => (unassigned)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
ltsp-client: attempted to send on closed socket
htt
this is an ltsp specific prob, marking invalid for nbd
** Changed in: nbd
Status: New => Invalid
--
ltsp-client: attempted to send on closed socket
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310250
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
I would suggest adding the -persist parameter to the initrd. However, I
don't have any idea how to do that...
There are two rc-scripts left:
/etc/init.d/nbd-client
/etc/init.d/ltsp-client-setup
I would suggest to add the -persist option here, too.
--
ltsp-client: attempted to send on closed so
This seems to be the same problem.
http://www.mail-archive.com/ltsp-
disc...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg35112.html
Solution (see there):
"
> Hello,
>
> because of importance of these probĺems we have now 3 ways to protect
> the clients from freeze because of loosing connections:
>
> 1. TCP-Keep
"why are you using xinetd ?" -- no idea, I just setup a new server,
installed ltsp-server-standalone, followed by ltsp-build-client -- then
it complained that I'm using xinetd instead of inetd.
Indeed, no client was able to download i386.img at boot time.
So I typed "apt-get install openbsd-inetd
** Also affects: nbd
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
ltsp-client: attempted to send on closed socket
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310250
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
I cannot believe that this is a problem of xinetd. I converted the
inet.conf via xconv.pl, it should do exactly what inetd does.
Please refer also to similar bugs and bugfixes, e. g.
http://lwn.net/Articles/267685/.
I think, it is a fundamental problem of nbdrootd.
Are you able to reboot the ser
why are you using xinetd ? by default ltsp-server depends on openbsd-
inetd since this is the only inetd tested and shipped in ubuntu ltsp
installations, i would assume something in your xinetd setup is missing,
please refer to the xientd documentation.
** Changed in: ltsp (Ubuntu)
Status:
15 matches
Mail list logo