[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-05-01 Thread Ste
I get the same error as Gem on comment #29 (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video- intel/+bug/314928/comments/29) running the command below: r...@miniderfel:~# echo base=0x03f60 size=0x1000 type=write-combining /proc/mtrr bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-30 Thread molecule-eye
@Bartek: I haven't looked at the script, but it's extremely easy to add the echo... line to your (probably empty) /etc/rc.local file, which will automate the process for you (as already recommended by sunken). However, as noted by Francois, the mtrr entry is reset if you kill X (e.g. by logging

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-30 Thread Bartek
@molecule-eye: What I mean by automate is that one does not have to manually hunt for the correct base address and size. With some tweaks it could probably be packaged as a workaround until the drivers are fixed. The script should be run by the display manager (ie gdm) to ensure persistence. --

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-30 Thread Iain
Can I suggest that the script is changed so that if that address is already present in the mtrr then it doesn't add it (otherwise, each time you add it a count variable is incremented). I'm not sure if this could realistically happen if you're running it only when x starts and x clears it when it

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-30 Thread Bartek
@Iain: that wouldn't quite work because the base is prefixed with another zero in the /proc/mtrr output (and I'm not sure whether this is always the case), but changing the grep argument to just $address should work. Thank you. -- [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-30 Thread Bartek
oops, sorry no, of course it wouldn't... hmm, ok how about so ** Attachment added: check whether mtrr range has been set up, move 0x prefixes to echo http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26193373/fixmtrr.sh -- [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-30 Thread Bartek
Is this an acceptable automatic hack for the missing MTRR range? I realise there might be a problem when two VGA controllers are present, but at least it does not require user interaction (if run as root). ** Attachment added: fixmtrr.sh http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26188260/fixmtrr.sh --

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-28 Thread martin
Looks like there is more than enough information here to send this to the intel driver developers. I strongly recommend that someone who experiences this bug and understands the issues opens a high quality bug report at http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ (file against xorg and set component field to

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-28 Thread Zack Evans
Guys, I think this explains why 2.6.30RC2 performance is hugely better for me than 2.6.28-11. I currently have two kernels installed. 2.6.30-020630rc2-generic 2.6.28-11.42-generic Under the 30RC2 kernel, I see the following in kern.log (good news, I assume!) Apr 27 10:40:39 vademecum kernel: [

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-27 Thread Tom Chiverton
It's been three months - what's the plan to fix this (esp. given all the other performance problems [intel] graphics users are having) ? -- [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314928 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-27 Thread molecule-eye
@Gem: provide your lspci -v output (by typing lspci -v in the console) for the VGA Compatible Controller. -- [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314928 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-27 Thread Iain
I'm using Jaunty (UNR) but my /proc/mtrr looks quite different. Not sure if this is something that's been configured by the UNR people or if it's generated by the ubuntu installer, but I have 8 registers defined! cat /proc/mtrr reg00: base=0x0fffe ( 4095MB), size= 128KB, count=1:

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-27 Thread Iain
Sorry, forgot to mention that I'm using a GM945/Acer Aspire One. And I haven't modified /proc/mtrr at all. -- [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314928 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-27 Thread Iain
After a little reading around, I think this might be something to do with the acer bios: apparently it acquires all of the mtrr registers for itself (I've set the mtrr cleanup kernel option and now there are only 4 in /proc/mtrr) -- [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-27 Thread Gem
lspci -v 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82Q963/Q965 Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02) Subsystem: Dell Device 01da Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 2300 Memory at dfe0 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1M] Memory at

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-27 Thread Iain
I've had a good, long hack away at getting the fix above to stick whenever you log into x (surely there must be a way of doing it through /etc/X11/xinit?) but I can't get it to stay. My solution has been to create a script containing the above, add that script to sudoers, then make gnome run that

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-26 Thread Gem
I also don't understanding how to fix the bug for me. this is my lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82Q963/Q965 Memory Controller Hub (rev 02) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82Q963/Q965 PCI Express Root Port (rev 02) 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-25 Thread Guido
Excuse me but I don't understanding how to fix the bug for me! this is my lspci Region 0: Memory at b008 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=512K] Region 1: I/O ports at 1800 [size=8] Region 2: Memory at c000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M] Region 3: Memory at b000 (32-bit,

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-25 Thread molecule-eye
@Guido: You can do exactly what I did. Type the following in terminal. sudo -s echo base=0xc000 size=0x1000 type=write-combining /proc/mtrr The size=0x1000 parameter specifies (in hex) 256MB. -- [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-25 Thread rfugger
This fixes Bug #346289 for me: Choppy Flash playback in full screen. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/346289 -- [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314928 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-24 Thread molecule-eye
I can also confirm very choppy fullscreen flash playback and that the fix provided in the original bug report works. Here is my /proc/mtrr before the fix: reg00: base=0x0 (0MB), size= 1024MB, count=1: write-back reg01: base=0x03f70 ( 1015MB), size=1MB, count=1: uncachable

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-24 Thread gilipter
how did I fix this? settings/preferences/compiz config settings manager in the general tab uncheck Unredirect fullscreen windows and that is it, no more choppy full screen video on youtube. hope this helps. marjan. -- [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-23 Thread Yannick Defais
This bug affect the MSI Wind too: uptodate Jaunty: % lspci -vvnn 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GME Express Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:27ae] (rev 03) Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:0110] Control: I/O+

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-22 Thread dentaku65
I've fixed issues with my intel VGA adding VideoRam option in xorg.conf http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=7121605postcount=34 I did not touch /proc/mtrr -- [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314928 You received this bug

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-21 Thread David Mohammed
Francois - similar thread (http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=7078262postcount=35) with one answer I devised - if you find a simpler method please let everyone know. Thanks -- [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314928 You received

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-20 Thread Francois Rigaut
Thanks for the fix. Got the same problem with a GM945, and this seems to fix it. I've read somewhere in this thread that the new line in /proc/mtrr gets wiped out after a reboot (or X restart?). Do any of you have any advice on how to implement this fix so that it survives reboots? I mean, it's

Re: [Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-20 Thread sunken
One thing to do is to add the echo line to /etc/rc.local 2009/4/20 Francois Rigaut frig...@users.sourceforge.net Thanks for the fix. Got the same problem with a GM945, and this seems to fix it. I've read somewhere in this thread that the new line in /proc/mtrr gets wiped out after a reboot

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-20 Thread sunken
When you've found the line that works best for your system you could add it to /etc/rc.local In my case: #!/bin/sh -e # # rc.local # # This script is executed at the end of each multiuser runlevel. # Make sure that the script will exit 0 on success or any other # value on error. # # In order to

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-20 Thread Francois Rigaut
@Sunkem. Thanks. But that only works for your first xorg session. If you kill the X server (or log out/back in), the mtrr setting disappears. -- [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314928 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-20 Thread max
I can confirm that echo base=0xe000 size=0x1000 type=write-combining /proc/mtrr fixes choppy fullscreen flash issues on an Intel Corporation Mobile GME965/GLE960 Integrated Graphics Controller in Ubuntu Jaunty 9.04 -- [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-19 Thread Conn
Bryce others, It seems this issue is relevant to many (if not all?) Intel chipset users. I have access to three systems with integrated graphics - a 900GMA desktop, 865G desktop and 855GM laptop - and none of these systems setup write-combining MTRR ranges properly. Although this causes issues

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-19 Thread Jose Bernardo
On my aspire one 110L running jaunty (freshly updated) this doesn't work: # echo base=0x6000 size=0x1000 type=write-combining /proc/mtrr bash: echo: erro de escrita: Dispositivo sem espaço livre (which is the translation for write error:device full, I think) lspci -vvnn: 00:02.0 VGA

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-16 Thread drag0njoe
Thanks, fixed video playing/youtube problems on my Toshiba Tecra A8 (i945 GM). Seems this problem affects many Intel GPU... Detailed: #lspci -vvnn 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:27a2] (rev 03)

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-14 Thread kuser
hello there, i landed here after a long www odysee related to that new choppy flash in fullscreen issue in jaunty alpha. onboard chip i915gm typing this into terminal: cat /proc/mtrr gives me those quite minimal info... reg00: base=0x0 (0MB), size= 2048MB, count=1: write-back reg01:

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-14 Thread kuser
ok, the here proposed fix really helps, thank u so much, so what i did was this: first checked for the region: lspci -vvnn: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Mobile 915GM/GMS/910GML Express Graphics Controller [8086:2592] (rev 04) Subsystem: Uniwill Computer

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-04-13 Thread Conn
I can confirm this on a DELL Inspiron 510m laptop Jaunty, with all the latest updates. The most notable problem I experience is stuttering video through Totem (using the standard GStreamer backend, Xv output) and other media players. Relevant lspci -vvnn output: 00:02.0 VGA compatible

[Bug 314928] Re: [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional?

2009-03-04 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Summary changed: - [915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional? + [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional? -- [i915GM] MTRR entry missing since jaunty - is this intentional? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314928 You received this bug notification