On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:21:02PM -, Bryce Harrington wrote:
We have a master bug already open about -fglrx / -ati incompatibilities,
bug #285603. I've merged some of the comments from this bug over to
that one, so we can close this one and just have a single bug for the
incompatibility
We have a master bug already open about -fglrx / -ati incompatibilities,
bug #285603. I've merged some of the comments from this bug over to
that one, so we can close this one and just have a single bug for the
incompatibility problems.
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu Jaunty)
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 06:10:48PM -, Tormod Volden (~offline till March)
wrote:
There used to be a hook in modprobe that would only load the fglrx
module if fglrx was specified as the driver in xorg.conf. Now that
xorg.conf is not used any longer (for ati at least, and I suppose for
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 09:18:18AM -, Alexander Sack wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 06:10:48PM -, Tormod Volden (~offline till March)
wrote:
There used to be a hook in modprobe that would only load the fglrx
module if fglrx was specified as the driver in xorg.conf. Now that
i didnt keep the xorg fglrx package ... i removed it and forgot about
the linux-source package. AFAIK, there is no mechanism to make
linux-source-fglrx go away if you uninstlal the xorg package;
What if we let linux-source-fglrx depend on the fglrx ddx?
--
[R580] EXA has severe performance
There used to be a hook in modprobe that would only load the fglrx
module if fglrx was specified as the driver in xorg.conf. Now that
xorg.conf is not used any longer (for ati at least, and I suppose for
fglrx neither?), this is no solution. I guess our X has been patched to
prefer the fglrx
so this happend because i had the linux-source-fglrx package installed.
dkms kicked in and the module was loaded and then used by -ati driver
... scary.
I think we need to do something about this on packagin layer ... either
-ati should conflict with that package, or linux-source-fglrx could
setting high as its a regression and makes the default desktop unusable
on a not so old ati card that previously worked.
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu Jaunty)
Importance: Medium = High
--
[R580] EXA has severe performance impact on ATI R580 (X1900)
** Summary changed:
- EXA has severe performance impact on ATI R580 (X1900)
+ [R580] EXA has severe performance impact on ATI R580 (X1900)
** Description changed:
- Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-ati
-
Jaunty upgrade 1:6.9.0.91-1ubuntu3 had severe performance impact on my
ati
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu Jaunty)
Status: New = Triaged
Target: None = ubuntu-9.04-beta
--
[R580] EXA has severe performance impact on ATI R580 (X1900)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315889
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Please attach new logs.
--
[R580] EXA has severe performance impact on ATI R580 (X1900)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315889
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
(asac reported the issue went away after purging fglrx.)
asac, let me know if you're seeing any further performance impacts now
that this is squared away, or else that we can close this bug.
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu Jaunty)
Target: ubuntu-9.04-beta = None
--
[R580]
12 matches
Mail list logo
