[Bug 322761] Re: libdrm apparently uninstallable on port archs

2010-01-14 Thread Emmet Hikory
Just as confirmation, it has ceased to be an issue. I have successfully installed libdrm on powerpc in karmic. -- libdrm apparently uninstallable on port archs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322761 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 322761] Re: libdrm apparently uninstallable on port archs

2009-03-18 Thread Bryce Harrington
I think this has long since ceased to be an issue. Reopen (and clarify) if I'm wrong. ** Changed in: libdrm (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- libdrm apparently uninstallable on port archs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322761 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 322761] Re: libdrm apparently uninstallable on port archs

2009-03-05 Thread Bryce Harrington
Hi ccheney, Please attach the output of `lspci -vvnn`, and attach your /var/log/Xorg.0.log (and maybe Xorg.0.log.old) file from after reproducing this issue. If you've made any customizations to your /etc/X11/xorg.conf please attach that as well. [This is an automated message. Apologies if

[Bug 322761] Re: libdrm apparently uninstallable on port archs

2009-01-29 Thread Timo Aaltonen
it's because the kernel provides the drm headers nowadays, so components which need them (via libdrm-dev) need a newer linux-libc-dev (provided by 2.6.28-4 -). The ports still use the hardy kernel AIUI, so things are broken there. -- libdrm apparently uninstallable on port archs

[Bug 322761] Re: libdrm apparently uninstallable on port archs

2009-01-29 Thread Chris Cheney
Timo, Is there any plan to fix this soon? This looks like it may end up blocking anything that uses libgl (eg anywhere in their dep chain) otherwise on ports? As far as I can tell that looks like it is the probable reason kdelibs4-dev is not installable. Chris -- libdrm apparently

[Bug 322761] Re: libdrm apparently uninstallable on port archs

2009-01-29 Thread Chris Cheney
I forgot to mention it looks like nothing depends directly on libdrm- dev, so that probably isn't the source of the uninstallable issue. It seems if it is libdrm then it is libdrm2 that is not installable since several things depend on that including libgl. Chris -- libdrm apparently