[Bug 323950] Re: block invalid combinations of TCP flags

2010-02-04 Thread PatRiehecky
Thanks for your research into the kernel source, it was most helpful in determining what INVALID does (as you mentioned the man pages are a bit vague there). -- block invalid combinations of TCP flags https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323950 You received this bug notification because you are a memb

[Bug 323950] Re: block invalid combinations of TCP flags

2010-02-03 Thread Jamie Strandboge
The following lines were put into /etc/ufw/before.rules to address invalid combinations of tcp flags in the first place: # drop INVALID packets (logs these in loglevel medium and higher) -A ufw-before-input -m state --state INVALID -j ufw-logging-deny -A ufw-before-input -m state --state INVALID -

[Bug 323950] Re: block invalid combinations of TCP flags

2010-01-23 Thread Jamie Strandboge
** Changed in: ufw Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Changed in: ufw (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Changed in: ufw (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-10.04 -- block invalid combinations of TCP flags https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323950 You received this bug notifica

Re: [Bug 323950] Re: block invalid combinations of TCP flags

2009-11-23 Thread Ryan Giobbi
Got it, looks good. On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:18 PM, PatRiehecky wrote: > I believe I built the patch to update both rule sets I may have > botched it (and it wouldn't be the first time I've done that), but my > intent was for the first section to update IPv6 and the second to do v4. > > -- >

[Bug 323950] Re: block invalid combinations of TCP flags

2009-11-20 Thread PatRiehecky
I believe I built the patch to update both rule sets I may have botched it (and it wouldn't be the first time I've done that), but my intent was for the first section to update IPv6 and the second to do v4. -- block invalid combinations of TCP flags https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323950 You

Re: [Bug 323950] Re: block invalid combinations of TCP flags

2009-11-18 Thread Ryan Giobbi
These rules can be applied to ipv6 connections also (switch iptables to ip6table). On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:05 PM, PatRiehecky wrote: > I figured I would put forth a patch to implement the simplest starting > ground.  Established connections aren't overly protected by this (there > are some eas

Re: [Bug 323950] Re: block invalid combinations of TCP flags

2009-11-16 Thread Ryan Giobbi
They look very reasonable - great job! On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:05 PM, PatRiehecky wrote: > I figured I would put forth a patch to implement the simplest starting > ground.  Established connections aren't overly protected by this (there > are some easy things to do), but a basic bad flags scan

[Bug 323950] Re: block invalid combinations of TCP flags

2009-11-13 Thread PatRiehecky
I figured I would put forth a patch to implement the simplest starting ground. Established connections aren't overly protected by this (there are some easy things to do), but a basic bad flags scan will be blocked. ** Attachment added: "Basic bad flags block" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/3565

[Bug 323950] Re: block invalid combinations of TCP flags

2009-07-11 Thread Jamie Strandboge
** Also affects: ufw (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ufw Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: ufw (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: ufw (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- block invalid combinations of TCP flags h