[Bug 325114] Re: content at webfiles.uci.edu and webfiles.nacs.uci.ed should both be considered valid and secure

2009-02-14 Thread Andreas Olsson
No, I don't think Ubuntu wants to change the rules of the entire trust model on which https rely. I'm setting the status of this bug to invalid. You might want to point out this issue to a suitable system administrator @uci.edu. ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => In

Re: [Bug 325114] Re: content at webfiles.uci.edu and webfiles.nacs.uci.ed should both be considered valid and secure

2009-02-03 Thread dlebauer
i don't know. i thought someone could change the rules. i am just an end user trying to help; if it's not a bug, please disregard On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Andreas Olsson wrote: > If the website webfiles.nacs.uci.edu presents itself using a certificate > named (CN) webfiles.uci.edu, how is

[Bug 325114] Re: content at webfiles.uci.edu and webfiles.nacs.uci.ed should both be considered valid and secure

2009-02-03 Thread Andreas Olsson
If the website webfiles.nacs.uci.edu presents itself using a certificate named (CN) webfiles.uci.edu, how is that a bug in Firefox? What behavior do you expect from Firefox when the websites presents a certificate not matching its own address? ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New

[Bug 325114] Re: content at webfiles.uci.edu and webfiles.nacs.uci.ed should both be considered valid and secure

2009-02-03 Thread dlebauer
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21964585/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ExtensionSummary.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21964586/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: "profiles.ini.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21964587/profiles