** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Debian)
Status: Unknown = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325506
Title:
/usr/lib/jni not put in java.library.path
To manage
However, I don't see this change going in Squeeze. If you are OK, I will
upload your modification as soon as Squeeze is out (and also in Ubuntu).
This will allow us some deeper testing and potential side effects.
How does it sound ?
Sylvestre
Sounds great - I didn't expect it to get into
Le jeudi 18 novembre 2010 à 09:45 -0500, Scott Howard a écrit :
However, I don't see this change going in Squeeze. If you are OK, I will
upload your modification as soon as Squeeze is out (and also in Ubuntu).
This will allow us some deeper testing and potential side effects.
How does it
On 17.11.2010 17:09, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 à 10:54 -0500, Scott Howard a écrit :
tags 382686 patch
thanks
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Scott Howardshoward...@gmail.com wrote:
I also don't
know if a user setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH on their own overwrites our
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com wrote:
not good. The license only allows unmodified distribution, plus it only
helps when calling the java binary, not when starting the VM in other
ways.
Matthias
If that's the way it is, then that's it.
If the license only
tags 382686 patch
thanks
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com wrote:
I also don't
know if a user setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH on their own overwrites our
java.library.path
Setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH appends java.library.path, but passing
-Djava.library.path to java
Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 à 10:54 -0500, Scott Howard a écrit :
tags 382686 patch
thanks
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com wrote:
I also don't
know if a user setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH on their own overwrites our
java.library.path
Setting
On 17.11.2010 16:54, Scott Howard wrote:
tags 382686 patch
thanks
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Scott Howardshoward...@gmail.com wrote:
I also don't
know if a user setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH on their own overwrites our
java.library.path
this is incomplete; only works if the jvm is called
Le vendredi 12 novembre 2010 à 09:51 -0500, Scott Howard a écrit :
I would to revisit this bug. I agree with the debian policy decision
to keep compiled binaries in /usr/lib/jni/, but I'm getting frequent
bug reports and emails form users of a library I maintain telling me
that I installed the
** Also affects: sun-java6 (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=382686
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
/usr/lib/jni not put in java.library.path
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325506
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Debian)
Importance: Undecided = Unknown
** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Debian)
Status: Fix Released = Unknown
** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Debian)
Remote watch: None = Debian Bug tracker #517338
--
/usr/lib/jni not put in java.library.path
** Changed in: sun-java6 (Debian)
Status: Unknown = Won't Fix
--
/usr/lib/jni not put in java.library.path
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325506
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Thanks Haggai,
Debian listed this as won't fix [1] for java 5, but the same should apply for
java 6:
these are binaries, and we are not allowed to ship those in modified
form.
[1]http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=382686
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #382686
Couldn't it be fixed somehow in a properties file, without changing the
binaries? Or perhaps using a wrapper around the java binary?
--
/usr/lib/jni not put in java.library.path
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325506
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Debian)
Importance: Unknown = Undecided
** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Debian)
Status: Unknown = New
** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Debian)
Remote watch: Debian Bug tracker #517338 = None
** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Debian)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
Yes, it still exists in lucid for sun java 6.
In eclipse, it reports the library path to be:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun-1.6.0.20/jre/lib/amd64/server:/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun-1.6.0.20/jre/lib/amd64:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun-1.6.0.20/jre/../lib/amd64:
Thanks for the report.
This has been fixed in openjdk-6-jre:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=517338
Does this bug still exist in in lucid for sun java?
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #517338
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=517338
** Also affects:
The same happens for openjdk-6-jre.
This caused eclipse and the subclipse package not to find the installed javahl
(libsvn-java package).
I think for user convinience this default location /usr/lib/jni should be set
as a default search path for
all java runtimes (don't now how to do this
** Attachment added: Wrapping script
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21997812/jre_wrapper.sh
--
/usr/lib/jni not put in java.library.path
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325506
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
19 matches
Mail list logo
