** Changed in: sugar
Status: New => Fix Released
--
Add dependency on libgtk2.0-bin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
h
OK then, no need.
** Changed in: sugar (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Luke Faraone (lfaraone) => (unassigned)
Status: New => Invalid
--
Add dependency on libgtk2.0-bin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
Yes: Sugar depends on things that depend on libgtk2.0
--
Add dependency on libgtk2.0-bin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
htt
Is it still pulled in by other deps on kubuntu and xubuntu? I'm in favor
of adding it explicitly.
--
Add dependency on libgtk2.0-bin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs m
While this *is* a valid dependency, as it is used by sugar, it's pulled
in by other sugar dependencies.
Does it really need to be added?
** Changed in: sugar (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Luke Faraone (lfaraone)
--
Add dependency on libgtk2.0-bin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328499
** Changed in: sugar
Status: Unknown => New
--
Add dependency on libgtk2.0-bin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328499
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:
