[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64

2012-11-30 Thread Bug Watch Updater
Launchpad has imported 6 comments from the remote bug at http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=307. If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at

[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64

2011-02-04 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: icedtea Importance: Unknown = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329903 Title: xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64 -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64

2009-03-21 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: icedtea Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329903 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64

2009-03-21 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Invalid -- xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329903 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64

2009-03-20 Thread Matthias Klose
another workaround is to pass -Xss1024k when running ant. ** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Triaged -- xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64

[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64

2009-03-17 Thread Matthias Klose
compile-core: [javac] Compiling 239 source files to /build/buildd/xom-1.1/build/classes [javac] [javac] [javac] The system is out of resources. [javac] Consult the following stack trace for details. [javac] java.lang.StackOverflowError [javac] at

[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64

2009-03-17 Thread Matthias Klose
** Bug watch added: Iced Tea Bugzilla #307 http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=307 ** Also affects: icedtea via http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=307 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on

[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64

2009-03-17 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: icedtea Status: Unknown = Confirmed -- xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329903 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64

2009-03-17 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package xom - 1.1-3ubuntu4 --- xom (1.1-3ubuntu4) jaunty; urgency=low * Revert Update default-jdk - default-jdk-builddep to resolve FTBFS, gcj isn't used in this package. * Workaround hotspot error by using the cacao VM. LP: #329903. -- Matthias

[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64

2009-03-11 Thread Chris Cheney
Matthias, This definitely looks like a bug in openjdk-6 after I have dug into it a bit more. I can compile fine on amd64 seemingly every time but compiling on i386 seems to fail every time. And since the buildds are i386 it fails there. Chris -- xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not

[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64

2009-03-11 Thread Martin Pitt
** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329903 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty

2009-03-04 Thread Chris Cheney
This is failing to build due to the buildd or some bug in the openjdk-6. It builds fine on my local machine. I have attached the build log. ** Attachment added: xom_1.1-3ubuntu3_amd64.build http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23430738/xom_1.1-3ubuntu3_amd64.build ** Summary changed: - xom FTBFS in

[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty

2009-02-17 Thread Daniel Holbach
Still broken, unsubscribing sponsors team for now. -- xom FTBFS in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329903 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty

2009-02-16 Thread Luke Yelavich
This was uploaded a while back, but was not marked as fixed. Please remember to add an LP: #xx tag to your diff next time. ** Changed in: xom (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released ** Changed in: xom (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- xom FTBFS in Jaunty

[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty

2009-02-15 Thread Alessio Treglia
** Attachment added: DEBDIFF http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22660814/DEBDIFF -- xom FTBFS in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329903 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty

2009-02-15 Thread Alessio Treglia
** Attachment added: xom_1.1-3ubuntu3.buildlog http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22660823/xom_1.1-3ubuntu3.buildlog ** Changed in: xom (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium Status: New = Confirmed -- xom FTBFS in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329903 You received this bug