Martin,
Will this be fixed before Jaunty release? It would be very helpful
especially for the openoffice.org case, which currently doesn't display
the package information at all.
Thanks,
Chris
--
apport-collect needs to be smarter about package name to report version
https://bugs.launchpad.net
I was about to file a bug with the same suggestion as in comment 1, i.e.
to allow the package name to be overridden, because this is useful in
other cases as well.
For example, when it's not yet clear which package is at fault, it might
be useful to collect information from other packages which ma
If the user has deb-src lines in apt (by default still), then we should
be able to grep "Binary:" out of apt-cache showsrc and fake a
binary package list. This would create some noise, and we can't really
tell what the "primary" binary package of a source package is, but we
can probably live with
As a workaround if there were a command line option I could just tell
the user to use it for the openoffice.org case.
eg:
apport-collect -P openoffice.org-core (bug number)
Thanks,
Chris
--
apport-collect needs to be smarter about package name to report version
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
Example apport-collect data showing the lack of version information:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/333474/comments/3
--
apport-collect needs to be smarter about package name to report version
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333875
You received this bug notificatio
