[Bug 336334] Re: F-Spot should be multi-threaded.

2010-09-16 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: f-spot Importance: Unknown = Wishlist -- F-Spot should be multi-threaded. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336334 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 336334] Re: F-Spot should be multi-threaded.

2009-07-16 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: f-spot Status: Unknown = Invalid -- F-Spot should be multi-threaded. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336334 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 336334] Re: F-Spot should be multi-threaded.

2009-06-22 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
upstream bug was closed as invalid, doing the same with this one, if they reopen thebug then we'll do the same. ** Also affects: f-spot via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579427 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: f-spot (Ubuntu) Status: New =

[Bug 336334] Re: F-Spot should be multi-threaded.

2009-04-18 Thread Ben James
Upstream (feature request) bug opened here: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579427 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #579427 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579427 -- F-Spot should be multi-threaded. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336334 You received this bug

[Bug 336334] Re: F-Spot should be multi-threaded.

2009-04-17 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
did anybody send it upstream at bugzilla.gnome.org? or should we close this report? -- F-Spot should be multi-threaded. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336334 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 336334] Re: F-Spot should be multi-threaded.

2009-04-17 Thread Ben James
I'll give it a day and open an upstream bug if no-one responds. -- F-Spot should be multi-threaded. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336334 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 336334] Re: F-Spot should be multi-threaded.

2009-03-26 Thread David Nielsen
This should probably be pushed upstream to avoid languishing in a downstream bugtracker. -- F-Spot should be multi-threaded. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336334 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 336334] Re: F-Spot should be multi-threaded.

2009-03-02 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
thanks for the report, right that's needed, patches are welcome. ** Changed in: f-spot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) -- F-Spot should be multi-threaded. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336334 You received this bug

[Bug 336334] Re: F-Spot should be multi-threaded.

2009-03-01 Thread Ben James
** Attachment added: Performing graphical operations in the GUI thread is suspected of causing this. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23265045/Screenshot-F-Spot.png -- F-Spot should be multi-threaded. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336334 You received this bug notification because you are a