[Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file

2009-05-05 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/dovecot/ubuntu -- dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339966 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu. --

[Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file

2009-05-05 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/dovecot/ubuntu -- dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339966 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file

2009-03-31 Thread Mathias Gug
** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Mathias Gug (mathiaz) Status: Triaged = In Progress -- dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339966 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file

2009-03-31 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package dovecot - 1:1.1.11-0ubuntu3 --- dovecot (1:1.1.11-0ubuntu3) jaunty; urgency=low [ Ante Karamatic ] * Add SMTP-AUTH support for Outlook (login auth mechanism) * debian/dovecot-postfix.postinst: - merge user's custom changes from dovecot.conf

[Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file

2009-03-31 Thread Mathias Gug
** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Mathias Gug (mathiaz) Status: Triaged = In Progress -- dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339966 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file

2009-03-31 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package dovecot - 1:1.1.11-0ubuntu3 --- dovecot (1:1.1.11-0ubuntu3) jaunty; urgency=low [ Ante Karamatic ] * Add SMTP-AUTH support for Outlook (login auth mechanism) * debian/dovecot-postfix.postinst: - merge user's custom changes from dovecot.conf

[Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file

2009-03-26 Thread Ante Karamatić
This patch covers all situations I could think off: - install of dovecot-postfix on top of already working dovecot and postfix - removing dovecot-postfix in this case would bring back configuration of postfix from before installation and would rename dovecot-postfix.conf, so that real

[Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file

2009-03-26 Thread Ante Karamatić
This patch covers all situations I could think off: - install of dovecot-postfix on top of already working dovecot and postfix - removing dovecot-postfix in this case would bring back configuration of postfix from before installation and would rename dovecot-postfix.conf, so that real

[Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file

2009-03-20 Thread Ante Karamatić
Right, (2) is an error from previous upload and (1) is an oversight (i didn't copy-paste it :). I'm fixing that and at the same time I would like to discuss some things. What would user expect on purge/removal of dovecot-postfix? At the moment, if the user removes dovecot-postfix,

[Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file

2009-03-20 Thread Ante Karamatić
Right, (2) is an error from previous upload and (1) is an oversight (i didn't copy-paste it :). I'm fixing that and at the same time I would like to discuss some things. What would user expect on purge/removal of dovecot-postfix? At the moment, if the user removes dovecot-postfix,

[Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file

2009-03-19 Thread Ante Karamatić
This is proposed solution: - check if dovecot.conf is customized and, if it is, copy it to dovecot-postfix.conf - ucf will notice diff and propose merging or overwriting to the user This patch also includes fix for outlook SASL-AUTH. ** Attachment added: lp-339966.debdiff

[Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file

2009-03-19 Thread Ante Karamatić
Changelog entry: Add SMTP-AUTH support for Outlook (login auth mechanism) isn't quite usefull. This would be better: dovecot-postfix: add login auth mechanism (required by Outlook) -- dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339966 You

[Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file

2009-03-19 Thread Mathias Gug
Thanks for the debdiff. The patch looks promising: 1. The temporary directory DIR is not removed. 2. All of the ucf logic is *only* run during the first install. A dovecot-postfix package upgrade won't run the ucf logic and thus maintainer changes to dovecot-postfix.conf won't be presented to

[Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file

2009-03-19 Thread Ante Karamatić
This is proposed solution: - check if dovecot.conf is customized and, if it is, copy it to dovecot-postfix.conf - ucf will notice diff and propose merging or overwriting to the user This patch also includes fix for outlook SASL-AUTH. ** Attachment added: lp-339966.debdiff

[Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file

2009-03-19 Thread Ante Karamatić
Changelog entry: Add SMTP-AUTH support for Outlook (login auth mechanism) isn't quite usefull. This would be better: dovecot-postfix: add login auth mechanism (required by Outlook) -- dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339966 You

[Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file

2009-03-19 Thread Mathias Gug
Thanks for the debdiff. The patch looks promising: 1. The temporary directory DIR is not removed. 2. All of the ucf logic is *only* run during the first install. A dovecot-postfix package upgrade won't run the ucf logic and thus maintainer changes to dovecot-postfix.conf won't be presented to

[Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file

2009-03-12 Thread Ante Karamatić
I suggest we check if dovecot.conf (minus ^protocols.* line) is different than the default one (minus ^protocols.* line) and, if it is, in preinst we copy that file into dovecot-postfix.conf and let the ucf do the rest. What do you think? -- dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new

[Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file

2009-03-12 Thread Ante Karamatić
I suggest we check if dovecot.conf (minus ^protocols.* line) is different than the default one (minus ^protocols.* line) and, if it is, in preinst we copy that file into dovecot-postfix.conf and let the ucf do the rest. What do you think? -- dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new

Re: [Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file

2009-03-10 Thread Mathias Gug
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 02:23:01AM -, C de-Avillez wrote: heh. Because I thought (wrongly, perhaps) that integration between Dovecot and postfix would be nice... Ok - thanks for making this clear. It seems that the description of the package could be updated to better explain what the

Re: [Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file

2009-03-10 Thread Mathias Gug
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 02:23:01AM -, C de-Avillez wrote: heh. Because I thought (wrongly, perhaps) that integration between Dovecot and postfix would be nice... Ok - thanks for making this clear. It seems that the description of the package could be updated to better explain what the

[Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file

2009-03-09 Thread C de-Avillez
The problem is that on already-configured dovecot installations there is a chance that the dovecot-postifx.conf will not work out-of-the-box. I am sure that for *new* installations of dovecot the provided d-p.conf will work fine -- but this is not to be expected for existing installs. But ideally

Re: [Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file

2009-03-09 Thread Mathias Gug
Thanks for taking the time to reply. On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 06:40:07PM -, C de-Avillez wrote: The problem is that on already-configured dovecot installations there is a chance that the dovecot-postifx.conf will not work out-of-the-box. I am sure that for *new* installations of dovecot

[Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file

2009-03-09 Thread C de-Avillez
heh. Because I thought (wrongly, perhaps) that integration between Dovecot and postfix would be nice... Of course (and no need to rub it even more on my face, it is already smeared all over ;-), I should have been more careful, and installed it first on a test machine. I wasn't, and I didn't.

[Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file

2009-03-09 Thread C de-Avillez
The problem is that on already-configured dovecot installations there is a chance that the dovecot-postifx.conf will not work out-of-the-box. I am sure that for *new* installations of dovecot the provided d-p.conf will work fine -- but this is not to be expected for existing installs. But ideally

Re: [Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file

2009-03-09 Thread Mathias Gug
Thanks for taking the time to reply. On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 06:40:07PM -, C de-Avillez wrote: The problem is that on already-configured dovecot installations there is a chance that the dovecot-postifx.conf will not work out-of-the-box. I am sure that for *new* installations of dovecot

[Bug 339966] Re: dangerous action: dovecot-postfix force-installs new conf file

2009-03-09 Thread C de-Avillez
heh. Because I thought (wrongly, perhaps) that integration between Dovecot and postfix would be nice... Of course (and no need to rub it even more on my face, it is already smeared all over ;-), I should have been more careful, and installed it first on a test machine. I wasn't, and I didn't.