[Bug 340817] Re: private-synchronous and private-icon-only are non-compliant capability names

2009-03-13 Thread David Barth
Mirco has just committed a patch for that. ** Changed in: notify-osd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- private-synchronous and private-icon-only are non-compliant capability names https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340817 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 340817] Re: private-synchronous and private-icon-only are non-compliant capability names

2009-03-13 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package notify-osd - 0.9.3-0ubuntu1 --- notify-osd (0.9.3-0ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low * New upstream version: - don't crash on download notifications (lp: #332042) - correctly pass actions to the fallback (lp: #340773) - correctly namespace

[Bug 340817] Re: private-synchronous and private-icon-only are non-compliant capability names

2009-03-13 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: notify-osd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) Status: New = Confirmed -- private-synchronous and private-icon-only are

[Bug 340817] Re: private-synchronous and private-icon-only are non-compliant capability names

2009-03-13 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package gnome-settings-daemon - 2.25.92-0ubuntu6 --- gnome-settings-daemon (2.25.92-0ubuntu6) jaunty; urgency=low * debian/control.in: - list vcs url * debian/patches/16_use_synchronous_notifications.patch: - updated capability naming (lp:

[Bug 340817] Re: private-synchronous and private-icon-only are non-compliant capability names

2009-03-12 Thread Matthew Paul Thomas
** Summary changed: - private-synchronous is a non-compliant capability name + private-synchronous and private-icon-only are non-compliant capability names ** Description changed: - Binary package hint: notify-osd + The notification specification part 9.1.1 says New vendor-specific caps + may