This bug was fixed in the package ecj - 3.4.2-2ubuntu7
---
ecj (3.4.2-2ubuntu7) karmic; urgency=low
* Make libecj-java-gcj a Suggests rather than a Recommends of libecj-java,
now that it is recommended by gcj-4.4-jdk (LP: #347393)
-- Thierry CarrezFri, 12 Jun 2009
13:20:14
I fixed the Maintainer field to match the current recommendation in
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianMaintainerField. Otherwise, looks fine.
--
libecj-java shouldn't systematically recommend libecj-java-gcj
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347393
You received this bug notification because you are a me
ecj (3.4.2-2ubuntu7) karmic; urgency=low
* Make libecj-java-gcj a Suggests rather than a Recommends of libecj-java,
now that it is recommended by gcj-4.4-jdk (LP: #347393)
** Attachment added: "ecj_3.4.2-2ubuntu7.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27818533/ecj_3.4.2-2ubuntu7.debdiff
Matthias prepared gcj-4.4-jdk for this (it now recommends libecj-java-
gcj as well), and said it's now ok to make this a suggest in libecj-
java.
This is needed as part of https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec
/server-karmic-eucalyptus-fit-on-cd
** Changed in: ecj (Ubuntu)
Importance:
libecj-java is architecture `all', so afaik we cannot have different
recommends for different architectures. when we can do this, we should
modify dh_nativejava to generate these.
** Changed in: ecj (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: ecj (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triage