[Bug 34840] Re: Rails needs gems

2006-11-04 Thread Daniel Aborg
Rubygems has many issues which were raised on ruby mailing lists but never addressed by the rubygems developers. It's therefore not possible to have rubygems-based packages in Debian or Ubuntu. For more details, refer to : http://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/rubygems.html I'm not sure what

[Bug 34840] Re: Rails needs gems

2006-11-04 Thread Rocco Stanzione
The problem isn't specific to rails. I do a lot of development that requires Ruby libraries not available from the repos, and some of those in turn depend on rubygems. It's analogous to cpan for Perl (which is packaged) and pretty much ubiquitous among Ruby developers. I've installed rubygems

[Bug 34840] Re: Rails needs gems

2006-10-03 Thread Colin Watson
Lucas, is there any reason why we can't just sync the rubygems package from Debian experimental? What state is it in? -- Rails needs gems https://launchpad.net/bugs/34840 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 34840] Re: Rails needs gems

2006-08-21 Thread Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen
It sounds like philosophical issues. In which case we either need: - ubuntu packages for alle the different rails ruby add-ons, without gems - onofficial packages for gems (perhaps in universe, for all I care) Although, since it isn't a liscense issue, I do feel debian/ubuntu shouldn't push

[Bug 34840] Re: [Bug 34840] Re: Rails needs gems

2006-08-21 Thread Rick DeNatale
On 8/21/06, Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It sounds like philosophical issues. In which case we either need: - ubuntu packages for alle the different rails ruby add-ons, without gems - onofficial packages for gems (perhaps in universe, for all I care) Although, since it