[Bug 350925] Re: libdrm-nouveau1.symbols declares incorrect dependency on libdrm2

2009-04-03 Thread Bryce Harrington
Thanks, upload sponsored -- libdrm-nouveau1.symbols declares incorrect dependency on libdrm2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350925 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 350925] Re: libdrm-nouveau1.symbols declares incorrect dependency on libdrm2

2009-04-03 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package libdrm - 2.4.5-0ubuntu4 --- libdrm (2.4.5-0ubuntu4) jaunty; urgency=low * debian/libdrm-nouveau1.symbols: - Fix thinko copied over from libdrm-intel1.symbols. The file should specify libdrm-nouveau1 as the corresponding package, not

[Bug 350925] Re: libdrm-nouveau1.symbols declares incorrect dependency on libdrm2

2009-03-30 Thread Chris Halse Rogers
Bryce: I think the changes now in libdrm git are ready to go. Thanks! -- libdrm-nouveau1.symbols declares incorrect dependency on libdrm2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350925 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 350925] Re: libdrm-nouveau1.symbols declares incorrect dependency on libdrm2

2009-03-29 Thread Chris Halse Rogers
libdrm-nouveau1.symbols specifies libdrm2 as its dependant package, rather than libdrm-nouveau1. This means that xserver-xorg-video-nouveau fails to get a dependency on libdrm-nouveau1. PS: We *do* check our packages before upload. However, because I've also checked libdrm before upload, I

[Bug 350925] Re: libdrm-nouveau1.symbols declares incorrect dependency on libdrm2

2009-03-29 Thread Bryce Harrington
Chris, excellent thanks, are the changes in libdrm git ready for upload? Give me the thumbs up when you're ready to see the upload go in. @Denis, -nouveau is still an experimental driver not yet officially supported by Canonical, and the reason it is available at all is thanks to volunteers like

[Bug 350925] Re: libdrm-nouveau1.symbols declares incorrect dependency on libdrm2

2009-03-29 Thread Denis Rut'kov
I'm sorry if I was too impatient. The next Ubuntu release is near, and I want it to have as little bugs as possible. But if even the packaging is wrong - what about more serious bugs? I also wanted the nouveau driver to be the default one for nvidia users, because I had not a pleasant experience

Re: [Bug 350925] Re: libdrm-nouveau1.symbols declares incorrect dependency on libdrm2

2009-03-29 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:48:59PM -, Denis Rut'kov wrote: I'm sorry if I was too impatient. The next Ubuntu release is near, and I want it to have as little bugs as possible. You can trust that you're not unique in that desire. You can help us achieve that by testing and reporting bugs