[Bug 351389] Re: 64bit restricted extras should use 64bit flash and java plugins

2009-07-08 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-restricted-extras - 35 --- ubuntu-restricted-extras (35) karmic; urgency=low * Prefer sun-java6-plugin over icedtea6-plugin (LP: #351389) -- Simon OlofssonTue, 07 Jul 2009 10:53:49 +0200 ** Changed in: ubuntu-restricted-extras (Ubuntu)

[Bug 351389] Re: 64bit restricted extras should use 64bit flash and java plugins

2009-07-07 Thread Onkar Shinde
I will sponsor this debdiff sometime today. ** Changed in: ubuntu-restricted-extras (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Onkar Shinde (onkarshinde) -- 64bit restricted extras should use 64bit flash and java plugins https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351389 You received this bug notification beca

[Bug 351389] Re: 64bit restricted extras should use 64bit flash and java plugins

2009-07-07 Thread Simon Olofsson
Onkar, attached is the debdiff you asked for. ** Attachment added: "debdiff that fixes this issue (updated for karmic)" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28758592/ubuntu-restricted-extras_35.debdiff ** Attachment removed: "debdiff that fixes this issue (updated)" http://launchpadlibrarian.net

[Bug 351389] Re: 64bit restricted extras should use 64bit flash and java plugins

2009-07-01 Thread Onkar Shinde
Can you please provide the patch against latest version in karmic? Also note that this is a native package. So the version should not be of the form ubuntuX. -- 64bit restricted extras should use 64bit flash and java plugins https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351389 You received this bug notificati

[Bug 351389] Re: 64bit restricted extras should use 64bit flash and java plugins

2009-05-19 Thread Simon Olofsson
Setting to confirmed, as outlined in the sponsorship procedure documentation ** Changed in: ubuntu-restricted-extras (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Confirmed -- 64bit restricted extras should use 64bit flash and java plugins https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351389 You received this bug no

[Bug 351389] Re: 64bit restricted extras should use 64bit flash and java plugins

2009-05-06 Thread Simon Olofsson
Jesper, thanks for the catch. You're right. Here is a updated patch. ** Attachment added: "debdiff that fixes this issue (updated)" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26395465/ubuntu-restricted-extras_31ubuntu1.debdiff ** Attachment removed: "debdiff that fixes this issue" http://launchpadlib

[Bug 351389] Re: 64bit restricted extras should use 64bit flash and java plugins

2009-05-06 Thread Jesper de Jong
Simon, are you sure that your patch is correct? I think it should be sun-java6-plugin, not sun-java6-jre. sun-java6-jre is just the Java runtime environment, without the browser plug-in. sun-java6-plugin is the browser plugin, which depends on sun-java6-jre. -- 64bit restricted extras should us

[Bug 351389] Re: 64bit restricted extras should use 64bit flash and java plugins

2009-05-06 Thread Simon Olofsson
Attached is a debdiff that prefers sun-java6-jre over icedtea6-plugin because some people might want the icedtea plugin. ** Attachment added: "debdiff that fixes this issue" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26385804/ubuntu-restricted-extras_31ubuntu1.debdiff ** Changed in: ubuntu-restricted-extr

[Bug 351389] Re: 64bit restricted extras should use 64bit flash and java plugins

2009-04-16 Thread Jesper de Jong
Note that currently, the 64-bit Adobe Flash Player 10 for Linux is a prerelease / alpha version, even though many people report that it works very well. (@Mike: You mean nspluginwrapper, not ndiswrapper). The problem with ubuntu-restricted-extras is that at this moment it depends on sun-java6-jre

[Bug 351389] Re: 64bit restricted extras should use 64bit flash and java plugins

2009-03-30 Thread Vojtěch Trefný
** Changed in: ubuntu-restricted-extras (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- 64bit restricted extras should use 64bit flash and java plugins https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351389 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --