[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2015-06-17 Thread Rolf Leggewie
lucid has seen the end of its life and is no longer receiving any updates. Marking the lucid task for this ticket as Won't Fix. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: Triaged = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2015-01-21 Thread Andy Whitcroft
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: Andy Whitcroft (apw) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Assignee: Andy Whitcroft (apw) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: In Progress = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2014-01-03 Thread Ben A
That canned response doesn't apply, as the problem is not in the kernel itself, but in the configuration Ubuntu is using to compile the kernel. The fix is simple: in the kernel config, change CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K8=y and CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ=y to CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K8=m and

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2014-01-03 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Ben A, thank you for you comment. Verified the Trusty configuration as per: git clone git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-trusty.git cd ubuntu-trusty grep -r CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K8= grep -r CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ= | grep debian

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2013-12-21 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Mathieu Velten, this bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue? If so, could you please test for this with the latest development release of Ubuntu? ISO images are available from

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2012-03-21 Thread Miguel Branco
Sure I have old hardware, but I have to recompile the entire kernel with module enabled for speedstep-centrino instead of just compiling the module in a few seconds, as I have to patch the driver for accepting the cpufreq tables for my Sonoma (stepping C0) 2.0 GHz Pentium-M which is not standard

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2011-01-24 Thread slayerdme
If anyone at the Kernel Team reads this, could they please expand on the comment cpufreq: it's hard to do in userspace? If I compile the current kernel myself, with just the one difference in which acpi-cpufreq is a module, everything works perfectly. Just check PPA for linux-phc if you don't

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2011-01-23 Thread oOarthurOo
Is this going to be marked as declined for Lucid, carried forward to Natty? I've seen loads of complaints about the move, and no one thanking anyone for it. At least carrying it forward would show it's still on someone's radar. Otherwise close it and mark as won't fix. -- You received this bug

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2011-01-23 Thread oOarthurOo
Ok.. found some more info from the Kernel Team specs for Natty: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Specs/KernelNattyConfigReview They have a general policy to build it in because, it's hard to do in userspace. No idea what that means, or why no other distro has difficulty with building

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2010-08-10 Thread xrayA4T
I also don't understand why if the module is going to be included in the kernel why it cannot have the patch to allow undervolting included. By default it does nothing except show what the current settings are. If you need to undervolt your computer (like I do because it reduces my CPU temperature

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2010-06-08 Thread Dana Goyette
What we really need is a noload parameter in that module... I'd imagine it should be relatively simple to have the driver abort (or do nothing and return success) if that parameter is set to true. -- acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2010-06-08 Thread slayerdme
@ Dana Goyette Even if that's possible, I don't think it's a good idea. The whole module architecture was made specifically for the case of loading and unloading them, and it's not good to have another way of basically doing the same thing. @Scott James Remnant Andy, i know where you live. If

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2010-04-27 Thread splashis
Just to keep things together and make you notice that more people care about this topic: http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/24567/ -- acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355232 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2010-04-12 Thread Florian Schröck
it turned out i just needed a current version of mplayer to watch 1080p movies without overclocking. nevertheless i'd like to have the full 3,2 GHz with speedstep enabled -- acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355232 You received

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2010-04-09 Thread Andy Whitcroft
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Milestone: ubuntu-10.04-beta-2 = None -- acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355232 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2010-03-31 Thread Florian Schröck
just because of this i built my own kernel on lucid 2.6.33, built with kernelcheck - with some hacks to make it work (patched kernelcheck, adapted grub, blacklisted nouveau in favour of nvidia) -- acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2010-03-09 Thread Andy Whitcroft
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Milestone: ubuntu-10.04-beta-1 = ubuntu-10.04-beta-2 -- acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355232 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2010-02-25 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Milestone: lucid-alpha-3 = ubuntu-10.04-beta-1 -- acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355232 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2010-02-05 Thread Scott James Remnant
Andy, i know where you live. If you revert these to modules, I will hunt you down and kill you. kthxbye -- acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355232 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2010-02-05 Thread Scott James Remnant
A better approach for the out-of-kernel issue would be to have a kernel command-line option to select or disable frequency scaling drivers, e.g. just scaling_driver=acpi-cpufreq or scaling_driver=none Then users can load another module later if they want. One major reason these have to

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2010-02-05 Thread David Gaarenstroom
First of all, such a kernel command-line option would be great... It will be a nightmare to write it and maintain it though. Go ahead and try to do it, please! I honestly would be thankful. I doubt it will be in time for Lucid... Loading all modules is what is already done, except the modules are

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2010-01-08 Thread Andy Whitcroft
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Milestone: lucid-alpha-2 = lucid-alpha-3 -- acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355232 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2009-12-08 Thread Andy Whitcroft
** Tags added: jaunty lucid ** Tags removed: kernel-jaunty kernel-lucid -- acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355232 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2009-12-07 Thread Andy Whitcroft
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Milestone: lucid-alpha-1 = lucid-alpha-2 -- acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355232 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2009-11-30 Thread Andy Whitcroft
** Tags added: kernel-jaunty kernel-lucid -- acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355232 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2009-11-27 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Ok we moved them in so we could get rid of userspace lash up to get them loaded under the commit below which appears to have originated from Scott. I assume in the no rules in userspace land we find ourselves we would need to find some kind of module alias match up to make these modularisable.

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2009-11-23 Thread Tim Gardner
Andy - we should consider pulling these frequency governors back out. ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Low Assignee: Tim Gardner (timg-tpi) Status: Triaged ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: Triaged = In Progress ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2009-10-09 Thread lxP
+1 from me too I have a AMD Phenom II Black Edition and want to optimize my system through custom Cool'n'Quiet. I undervolt my processor on lower power states and overclock a little bit with default voltage on highest power state. This allows me to lower power consumption in idle and also get

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2009-09-19 Thread thekip
Is there any news on this issue, to me it looks like a very small fix as no code has to be adjusted. I don't know anything about the processes behind such a change and I could be wrong saying this isn't a lot of work to fix, I'm just trying to see what the odds are of this bug making it into

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2009-07-11 Thread Arpad Kovacs
+1 from another AMD Turion and PHC user trying to reduce CPU temperature (50C - 30C) and extend battery life. I would really like to keep using Ubuntu, but compiling a custom kernel to enable undervolting is very time-consuming and could convince me to switch to another distro. Thanks in

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2009-07-10 Thread David Gaarenstroom
For what it's worth, it is in commit 495f78bd6d8f7a5e35dd962031eb6e639d83e438, which IMHO should be reverted: UBUNTU: Build in CPU Frequency scaling drivers Selecting the right CPU Frequency scaling driver is complicated from userspace, involing a nasty shell script that attempts

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2009-07-10 Thread David Gaarenstroom
Tim Gardner is responsible for introducing this, assign him to this bug. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Tim Gardner (timg-tpi) -- acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355232 You received this bug

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2009-06-26 Thread balak
I am in the same boat as most ppl above. I have been using ubuntu since breezy and undervolting the AMD Turion on my laptop since feisty. Usually I check to make sure the usual suspects (X, suspend/hibernate) have no issues before upgrading but did not think something basic as acpi/powernow would

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2009-06-01 Thread thekip
I'm having the same problem, I have been undervolting my laptop since at least feisty fawn which has always worked for me within an hour after upgrading to a new version of Ubuntu. Unfortunately this is not possible anymore because it is build in now. I think, allthough I know it is easy to say

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2009-04-30 Thread Schugy
I have a Raon Digital Everun Note UMPC and I need to replace the not working powernow-k8 code with a code that at least makes the conservative governor work. Currently the Turion X2 TL-56 is always running at 1200 MHz instead of 800 MHz. This results in 70 minutes battery life instead of 115

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2009-04-06 Thread Brian Murray
** Changed in: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged -- acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355232 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image

2009-04-06 Thread Leann Ogasawara
** Package changed: linux-meta (Ubuntu) = linux (Ubuntu) -- acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355232 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs