[Bug 36186] Re: Trivial and non-trivial enhancements for bugreport

2009-02-02 Thread Rolf Leggewie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 310741 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310741 Unfortunately, this report does not adfere to one issue, one report. I'll pick #1 as the most important issue, it is the one that all the following discussion focused on. Consequently, I am marking it as

[Bug 36186] Re: Trivial and non-trivial enhancements for bugreport

2008-05-16 Thread Sarah Hobbs
Please fix it, instead of removing it. A lot of us file legitimate bugs to debian with it. Perhaps create a message about reportbug being deprecated for Ubuntu, and an offer to launch apport, or something, or to specify a bug tracker. -- Trivial and non-trivial enhancements for bugreport

[Bug 36186] Re: Trivial and non-trivial enhancements for bugreport

2008-05-08 Thread Antony Gelberg
Several years later :) I got round to opening bug #228183. -- Trivial and non-trivial enhancements for bugreport https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36186 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 36186] Re: Trivial and non-trivial enhancements for bugreport

2008-03-30 Thread Adam Niedling
Are there people still using reportbug? Are the wishes of the original reporter satisfied or they won't be? Can this bug be closed? -- Trivial and non-trivial enhancements for bugreport https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36186 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 36186] Re: Trivial and non-trivial enhancements for bugreport

2008-03-30 Thread Josh Lee
As long as reportbug is still in the repository and the man page does not make it clear that reported bugs will be silently dropped, then yes, this bug should still be open. Ideally, of course, if reportbug is to stay, then launchpad should be modified to accept bug reports by email. -- Trivial

Re: [Bug 36186] Re: Trivial and non-trivial enhancements for bugreport

2008-03-30 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 23:36 +, Josh Lee wrote: As long as reportbug is still in the repository and the man page does not make it clear that reported bugs will be silently dropped, then yes, this bug should still be open. Ideally, of course, if reportbug is to stay, then launchpad should be

[Bug 36186] Re: Trivial and non-trivial enhancements for bugreport

2008-03-30 Thread James Andrewartha
To quote that page, Email for reporting and editing bugs must be GPG- signed which is not something bug reporters should be expected to do. -- Trivial and non-trivial enhancements for bugreport https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36186 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 36186] Re: Trivial and non-trivial enhancements for bugreport

2007-11-22 Thread Joris Mooij
The least thing that should be done IMHO is to issue a warning to the user when reportbug is started that, contrary to what one might expect, reportbug will NOT report a bug in the bug tracking system, but only send an email to the ubuntu-users list; furthermore, it should direct the user to the

[Bug 36186] Re: Trivial and non-trivial enhancements for bugreport

2007-10-25 Thread GerhardGaußling
I thought, that the development on apport etc. are fixed also reportbug, or at least reportbug-ng would fix all these issues on reportbug. But ist has got still the same issues. I strongly recommend to give reportbug, or at least reportbug-ng the capabilities, to communicate with launchpad.

[Bug 36186] Re: Trivial and non-trivial enhancements for bugreport

2007-10-24 Thread angrykeyboarder
Why reportbug even in the archive in it's current state? It serves no purpose as is. And what is the logic behind it's sending emails to the Ubuntu Users mailing list? reportbug is to report bugs, not to ask questions of other users. And lastly, how has this package continually migrated from

[Bug 36186] Re: Trivial and non-trivial enhancements for bugreport

2007-10-19 Thread scoopex
Johan, a few comments: - reportbug is no capable to run on X11 (this would be useful for users which are not using the commandline) - all communication methods are currently not compatible with launchpad - Maybe the bug-attributes of the debian-bts and launchpad are not compatible. (this

[Bug 36186] Re: Trivial and non-trivial enhancements for bugreport

2007-10-19 Thread Johan Walles
Scoopex, except for the communication with launchpad reportbug does everything you want. Extending reportbug seems like a better idea than to replace it when it's just a few new features that are needed. -- Trivial and non-trivial enhancements for bugreport https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36186

[Bug 36186] Re: Trivial and non-trivial enhancements for bugreport

2007-10-18 Thread scoopex
Reportbug seems to be broken on ubuntu. Please remove it. In my opition is is a good idea to write a new and very simple utility which is implemented the following way: - to prevent duplicate bugs, the tool provides information about existing bugs directly after startup - the tool should be

[Bug 36186] Re: Trivial and non-trivial enhancements for bugreport

2007-05-24 Thread James Andrewartha
apport is only for crashes, reportbug is for all kinds of bugs. ** Changed in: reportbug (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- Trivial and non-trivial enhancements for bugreport https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36186 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 36186] Re: Trivial and non-trivial enhancements for bugreport

2007-04-17 Thread Marco Rodrigues
I think this bug don't need to exist with the new apport and the new way to report bugs on ubuntu =) ** Changed in: reportbug (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Trivial and non-trivial enhancements for bugreport https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36186 You received this bug

[Bug 36186] Re: Trivial and non-trivial enhancements for bugreport

2006-06-18 Thread Kai Henningsen
IMO, a working reportbug is pretty much essential these days; the current state should really have been a release blocker for the whole distribution. And directing people to use a web browser, days after sending the bug, certainly does not seem to match any of this Ubuntu philosophy stuff your