[Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2010-04-22 Thread Timalot
I used initctl to see services running. Stopped them using stop. Then mount -o remount,ro / On karmic -- can't fsck / from friendly-recovery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363271 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ub

[Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2010-01-15 Thread ski
I agree a backport is needed here. -- can't fsck / from friendly-recovery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363271 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubu

[Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2010-01-15 Thread Brett Randall
+1 for backport to karmic. -- can't fsck / from friendly-recovery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363271 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/

[Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2009-11-15 Thread Michael Vogt
Lucid has re-added fsck now in the recovery menu we should consider backporting it. -- can't fsck / from friendly-recovery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363271 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing li

[Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2009-10-24 Thread ski
Two points: 1 - The bug in jaunty IS specific to ext4, and has existed since jaunty betas. Looks like in the end this bug has been "hijacked" by a related but more critical bug, so I'm not complaining just want to make sure we don't overlook that forever. 2 - I'd like to echo what others have s

[Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2009-10-24 Thread elrond
After update, in recovery mode selecting "dpkg" appears this message, in red: mountall: Cancelled. General error mounting filesystem. A maintenance shell will be now started. CONTROL-D will terminate this shell and re-try. Press enter for maintenance (or type Control-D to continue): but neither E

[Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2009-10-24 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package friendly-recovery - 0.2.8.2 --- friendly-recovery (0.2.8.2) karmic; urgency=low * usr/share/recovery-mode/options/fsck: - Drop fsck option because we can not reliable remount the filesystem readonly for a fsck (LP: #363271). In karmic

[Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2009-10-23 Thread Michael Vogt
** Summary changed: - can't fsck / if ext4 from friendly-recovery + can't fsck / from friendly-recovery -- can't fsck / from friendly-recovery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363271 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2009-10-22 Thread emarkay
#19: Actually it was working in early betas of Karmic, and I had my Jaunty systmes converted to ext4 and they all worked; or at least "appeared" to work. This is insane, IMHO; that something fundamental, a GRUB2 entry selection has a feature that is BROKEN, and is not being addressed BEFORE relea

[Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2009-10-22 Thread ski
emarkay, true. But bear in mind, it's been broken with ext4 since jaunty. I'd love to see one sooner, but I'm guessing we won't see a fix until after karmic's release. -- can't fsck / from friendly-recovery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363271 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2009-10-22 Thread emarkay
I think we all missed the point. The point is - it DOES NOT WORK AT ALL. All I see is a flash of "Mount is busy" and nothing more. This is on 2 PC's here; it's RC time, now! -- can't fsck / from friendly-recovery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363271 You received this bug notification because

Re: [Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2009-10-20 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 10:50 +, ski wrote: > But your point about having daemons running does have some truth to it, > and to answer that, I don't see why the functionality of friendly > recovery couldn't be whittled down to things that can be put in a single > binary located on /, statically l

[Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2009-10-20 Thread ski
> In System V, the only services missing in single user mode compared to > multi-user mode are login services, such as getty, gdm, sshd, etc. It's > not intended as a "recovery" mode. Well, I'll admit that I come from a mostly BSD background. I had no idea that sysV used runlevel 1 like that, or t

Re: [Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2009-10-20 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 08:40 +, ski wrote: > I just want to make sure we aren't considering losing the option of > booting to single user mode. > You seem to not understand what single user mode is. In System V, the only services missing in single user mode compared to multi-user mode are log

[Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2009-10-20 Thread ski
Scott - I disagree strongly that the root filesystem is usually already read-only when friendly-recovery is invoked. I don't just go to friendly recovery only when there is a problem (in fact I'm not sure I ever have in reaction to a problem). I admit I'm not a usual user, but there are plenty of c

[Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2009-10-19 Thread Scott James Remnant
James: only luck makes it work on Jaunty, usually you only tend to go to "friendly recovery" when you have a problem - and that problem usually means the root filesystem is already read-only. This needs to be reimplemented so that when any fsck fails, or any critical boot component, you get a frie

[Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2009-10-16 Thread ski
James & emarkay - it does NOT work in jaunty, at least with ext4 and amd64 architecture, as in the initial bug report (which i reconfirmed yesterday). -- can't fsck / from friendly-recovery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363271 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt

[Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2009-10-16 Thread emarkay
James (#10) - It does work in Jaunty, but NOTHING happens in Karmic, aside from the aforementioned short message. -- can't fsck / from friendly-recovery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363271 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

Re: [Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2009-10-16 Thread James Westby
On Thu Oct 15 18:02:09 UTC 2009 Scott James Remnant wrote: > At a guess, init, udev, dbus, etc. All the usual system services. So what changed that this no longer works? Brian confirmed that it worked on Jaunty on IRC. Thanks, James -- can't fsck / from friendly-recovery https://bugs.launchpa

[Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2009-10-15 Thread emarkay
#6 - James, that message only appears for about 1/4 second! -- can't fsck / from friendly-recovery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363271 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun

Re: [Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2009-10-15 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 11:26 +, James Westby wrote: > Could you please also provide the output of > > sudo fuser -v -m / > > when you get the "busy" message? > At a guess, init, udev, dbus, etc. All the usual system services. Scott -- Scott James Remnant sc...@ubuntu.com -- can't fsck /

[Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2009-10-15 Thread Brian Murray
screenshot of fuser output ** Attachment added: "9.10-friendly-recovery-fsck.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33739303/9.10-friendly-recovery-fsck.png -- can't fsck / from friendly-recovery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363271 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2009-10-15 Thread James Westby
Hi, Could you please also provide the output of sudo fuser -v -m / when you get the "busy" message? Thanks, James -- can't fsck / from friendly-recovery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363271 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to U

[Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2009-10-14 Thread ski
As a sanity check, I've reconfirmed the problem on a jaunty/ext4/amd64 system. When I select 'fsck' from the recovery menu, I am told: "mount: / is busy" (at the bottom of the screen, it goes away very quickly as the menu seems to refresh immediately after fsck errors out. When I select a root shel

[Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2009-10-14 Thread ldm
When recovering from a lockup or when system crashes, if you select the recovery option and then select fsck the screen blanks for a second and then returns to the original recovery screen. This also happens any time you select the this combination. Thus, there is no current way other than the l

[Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2009-10-14 Thread Brian Murray
This worked fine for me on a Jaunty system with the same version of friendly-recover however the filesystem was ext3. I wonder if that has something to do with it. -- can't fsck / from friendly-recovery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363271 You received this bug notification because you are a m

[Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2009-10-14 Thread Brian Murray
** Also affects: friendly-recovery (Ubuntu Karmic) Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Changed in: friendly-recovery (Ubuntu Karmic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Canonical Foundations Team (canonical-foundations) -- can't fsck / from friendly-recovery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2009-10-14 Thread Brian Murray
Confirmed using friendly-recovery version 0.2.8.1 on Karmic. ** Changed in: friendly-recovery (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: friendly-recovery (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- can't fsck / from friendly-recovery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363271 You recei

[Bug 363271] Re: can't fsck / from friendly-recovery

2009-04-18 Thread ski
PS - by jaunty, i mean jaunty RC1 with all updates from the net applied as of Sat Apr 18 08:16:32 GMT 2009 -- can't fsck / from friendly-recovery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363271 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --