This issue seems to have been resolved. Marking as "Fix Released".
** Changed in: flash-kernel (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
This issue should be revisited with natty.
** Changed in: flash-kernel (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu armel porters (ubuntu-armel)
** Changed in: flash-kernel (Ubuntu)
Milestone: ubuntu-10.10-beta => None
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) =>
I would think that flash-kernel-installer.postinst script should have
the ability to ensure that flash-kernel is enabled in /etc/kernel-
img.conf after installing the flash-kernel package. This is now
affecting the omap preinstalled images, as they don't use ubiquity to
create the image (except fo
** Changed in: flash-kernel (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: flash-kernel (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
On arme
** Tags removed: arm
--
On armel (Babbage platform), kernel image upgrading breaks if Ubiquity is
instructed not to install a bootloader
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365053
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-b
** Attachment added: "IRC log of #ubuntu-arm where we discussed this
extensively"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25876740/ubuntu-arm.txt
--
On armel (Babbage platform), kernel image upgrading breaks if Ubiquity is
instructed not to install a bootloader
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365053
And this is another option which drops --supported.
** Attachment added: "option2"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/2587/option2
--
On armel (Babbage platform), kernel image upgrading breaks if Ubiquity is
instructed not to install a bootloader
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365053
You rec
I don't like the crude greq; here's a nicer version of this option
** Attachment added: "option1"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25876662/option1
--
On armel (Babbage platform), kernel image upgrading breaks if Ubiquity is
instructed not to install a bootloader
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
My preference for initramfs-tools is still to add a new post-update-
initramfs option which would allow dropping the bunch of bootloader
calls in update-initramfs (elilo and folks).
--
On armel (Babbage platform), kernel image upgrading breaks if Ubiquity is
instructed not to install a bootloade
the fix for update-initramfs
--- ../update-initramfs 2009-04-23 12:15:22.0 +0200
+++ update-initramfs2009-04-23 12:23:05.0 +0200
@@ -263,7 +263,9 @@
zipl
fi
if flash-kernel --supported >/dev/null 2>&1; then
- flash-kernel
+
There are two aspects to this bug: firstly, that flash-kernel really
shouldn't fail in the absence of a configuration. The second is that
update-initramfs should be checking the appropriate hook from kernel-
img.conf. The hook to call flash-kernel will only be present if either
manually added, or
Subscribed Ubuntu Installer folks to hear what they think of the overall
approach :-)
--
On armel (Babbage platform), kernel image upgrading breaks if Ubiquity is
instructed not to install a bootloader
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365053
You received this bug notification because you are a m
So flash-kernel is installed in the live-system (I see it in the
manifest); perhaps it shouldn't be, or should be removed from the
installed, I'm not sure.
There's a way I can prevent it to fail though which is to mark it as
unsupported when there's no flash-kernel.conf; I think I'll upload that
t
I see; yes, that sounds plausible.
So it might make sense to remove the Recommends from linux-image-imx51
and install flash-kernel explicitly if the bootloader installation
option is enabled in ubiquity?
--
On armel (Babbage platform), kernel image upgrading breaks if Ubiquity is
instructed not
i dont think the dependency is wrong, the code in update-initramfs
should simply respect that there is no postinst_hook set (like the
postinst of the kernel package itself seems to do here) in the linux-
image postinst perl script the following code appears:
## Run user hook script here, if any
if
So I think the installer does thing correctly in that it doesn't pull a
bootloader and doesn't setup kernel-img.conf to run it (on systems where
the bootloader is installed, kernel-img.conf has: "postinst_hook =
flash-kernel"). The only problem is that flash-kernel gets installed
while it shouldn'
** Attachment added: "kernel-img.conf and flash-kernel.conf from default
install (bootloader installation enabled)"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25872625/kernel-img-conf-bootloader-installed.tar.gz
--
On armel (Babbage platform), kernel image upgrading breaks if Ubiquity is
instructed not
Perhaps do_initrd should be "no" when not installing the bootloader?
** Attachment added: "kernel-img.conf (bootloader installation not enabled in
ubiquity; no flash-kernel.conf is generated in this configuration)"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25872629/kernel-img-conf-bootloader-not-installe
Could you please attach your /etc/kernel-img.conf?
** Tags added: arm
--
On armel (Babbage platform), kernel image upgrading breaks if Ubiquity is
instructed not to install a bootloader
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365053
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Attachment added: "Verbose installer output (using ubiquity --debug)"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25847608/installer-logs.tar.bz2
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25847609/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "UbiquitySyslog.gz"
http://launchpa
20 matches
Mail list logo
