More information:
Just did a clean install off of the new jaunty CD
Same problem
So it fails to work out of the box on a system I haven't tampered with.
IMHO it's a bug.
My assumption is that login should automatically grant the user teh
appropriate perms on the vcs files.
--
in VT, screen n
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25996444/Dependencies.txt
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission problem to blame)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367318
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
Just wanted to note this problem was in spite of a fresh distro upgrade
from intrepid.
The bug was there too.
I used the same workaround.
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission problem to blame)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367318
You received this bug notification because you are
Just thought though of one thing that MC *could* do in the meantime, as
a workaround.
Since an inaccessible /dev/vcsa device prevents MC from properly saving
and restoring the screen when using C-O to flip flop to and from the
subshell, methinks that MC should be able to recognize a permission
pro
Another workaround: Install fp-compile to get the grab_vcsa
IMO still a bug. I think that mc should work "out of the box",
including subshell screen save/restore. At the least, I'd consider it
an unexpected annoyance that a regular end user (i.e., one who's not a
geek) would be somewhat at a lo
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: mc
Release: Jaunty Jackalope
Version of MC: Current as of apr 26, 2009
Expected:
- MC able to save and restore the shell screen
+ MC able to save and restore the subshell screen
Actual:
MC blanks out
- Detail:
+ To reproduce
Another workaround that seems like The Right Way (tm):
Make cons.saver sgid tty.
I observed in the changelog in the source that a similiar move was done
to accomodate Fedora 7, by making cons.saver suid vcsa. It would appear
that sgid tty is the ubuntuese version of that.
--
in VT, screen not
This fixes the problem.
** Attachment added: "makes cons.saver setgid tty"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27063128/mc.debian.patch
** Changed in: mc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: mc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Shentino (shentino)
--
in VT, screen not bei
** Changed in: mc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Shentino (shentino) => (unassigned)
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission problem to blame)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367318
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Thanks for your work. There is a new version on Debian (4.7.0), do you know if
the fix is still necessary ? I quickly backported the packages from Debian on
my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~gilir/+archive/unstable) if you need to test it.
Also it will be nice if you can give us a link of the upstre
I just test installed the package and the buggy behavior persists.
As far as Fedora, I really don't know which commit it was. It was just
mentioned in the change log. It was possibly reverted or perhaps never
was done in the ubuntu fork, since it was likely a fedora specific
issue.
Honestly, I'
I also took a look at the PPA you linked to, and it appears that
cons.saver isn't even present at all, let alone with the wrong
permissions.
Just to be clear, I'm not a developer, just an annoyed end user. My
apologies if I'm not much more help.
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission
More information:
Just did a clean install off of the new jaunty CD
Same problem
So it fails to work out of the box on a system I haven't tampered with.
IMHO it's a bug.
My assumption is that login should automatically grant the user teh
appropriate perms on the vcs files.
--
in VT, screen n
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25996444/Dependencies.txt
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission problem to blame)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367318
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
Just wanted to note this problem was in spite of a fresh distro upgrade
from intrepid.
The bug was there too.
I used the same workaround.
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission problem to blame)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367318
You received this bug notification because you are
More information:
Just did a clean install off of the new jaunty CD
Same problem
So it fails to work out of the box on a system I haven't tampered with.
IMHO it's a bug.
My assumption is that login should automatically grant the user teh
appropriate perms on the vcs files.
--
in VT, screen n
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25996444/Dependencies.txt
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission problem to blame)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367318
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
Just wanted to note this problem was in spite of a fresh distro upgrade
from intrepid.
The bug was there too.
I used the same workaround.
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission problem to blame)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367318
You received this bug notification because you are
Just thought though of one thing that MC *could* do in the meantime, as
a workaround.
Since an inaccessible /dev/vcsa device prevents MC from properly saving
and restoring the screen when using C-O to flip flop to and from the
subshell, methinks that MC should be able to recognize a permission
pro
Another workaround: Install fp-compile to get the grab_vcsa
IMO still a bug. I think that mc should work "out of the box",
including subshell screen save/restore. At the least, I'd consider it
an unexpected annoyance that a regular end user (i.e., one who's not a
geek) would be somewhat at a lo
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: mc
Release: Jaunty Jackalope
Version of MC: Current as of apr 26, 2009
Expected:
- MC able to save and restore the shell screen
+ MC able to save and restore the subshell screen
Actual:
MC blanks out
- Detail:
+ To reproduce
Another workaround that seems like The Right Way (tm):
Make cons.saver sgid tty.
I observed in the changelog in the source that a similiar move was done
to accomodate Fedora 7, by making cons.saver suid vcsa. It would appear
that sgid tty is the ubuntuese version of that.
--
in VT, screen not
This fixes the problem.
** Attachment added: "makes cons.saver setgid tty"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27063128/mc.debian.patch
** Changed in: mc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: mc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Shentino (shentino)
--
in VT, screen not bei
** Changed in: mc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Shentino (shentino) => (unassigned)
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission problem to blame)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367318
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Thanks for your work. There is a new version on Debian (4.7.0), do you know if
the fix is still necessary ? I quickly backported the packages from Debian on
my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~gilir/+archive/unstable) if you need to test it.
Also it will be nice if you can give us a link of the upstre
I just test installed the package and the buggy behavior persists.
As far as Fedora, I really don't know which commit it was. It was just
mentioned in the change log. It was possibly reverted or perhaps never
was done in the ubuntu fork, since it was likely a fedora specific
issue.
Honestly, I'
I also took a look at the PPA you linked to, and it appears that
cons.saver isn't even present at all, let alone with the wrong
permissions.
Just to be clear, I'm not a developer, just an annoyed end user. My
apologies if I'm not much more help.
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission
Thanks for your work. There is a new version on Debian (4.7.0), do you know if
the fix is still necessary ? I quickly backported the packages from Debian on
my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~gilir/+archive/unstable) if you need to test it.
Also it will be nice if you can give us a link of the upstre
I just test installed the package and the buggy behavior persists.
As far as Fedora, I really don't know which commit it was. It was just
mentioned in the change log. It was possibly reverted or perhaps never
was done in the ubuntu fork, since it was likely a fedora specific
issue.
Honestly, I'
I also took a look at the PPA you linked to, and it appears that
cons.saver isn't even present at all, let alone with the wrong
permissions.
Just to be clear, I'm not a developer, just an annoyed end user. My
apologies if I'm not much more help.
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25996444/Dependencies.txt
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission problem to blame)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367318
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
Just wanted to note this problem was in spite of a fresh distro upgrade
from intrepid.
The bug was there too.
I used the same workaround.
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission problem to blame)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367318
You received this bug notification because you are
More information:
Just did a clean install off of the new jaunty CD
Same problem
So it fails to work out of the box on a system I haven't tampered with.
IMHO it's a bug.
My assumption is that login should automatically grant the user teh
appropriate perms on the vcs files.
--
in VT, screen n
Just thought though of one thing that MC *could* do in the meantime, as
a workaround.
Since an inaccessible /dev/vcsa device prevents MC from properly saving
and restoring the screen when using C-O to flip flop to and from the
subshell, methinks that MC should be able to recognize a permission
pro
Another workaround: Install fp-compile to get the grab_vcsa
IMO still a bug. I think that mc should work "out of the box",
including subshell screen save/restore. At the least, I'd consider it
an unexpected annoyance that a regular end user (i.e., one who's not a
geek) would be somewhat at a lo
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: mc
Release: Jaunty Jackalope
Version of MC: Current as of apr 26, 2009
Expected:
- MC able to save and restore the shell screen
+ MC able to save and restore the subshell screen
Actual:
MC blanks out
- Detail:
+ To reproduce
Another workaround that seems like The Right Way (tm):
Make cons.saver sgid tty.
I observed in the changelog in the source that a similiar move was done
to accomodate Fedora 7, by making cons.saver suid vcsa. It would appear
that sgid tty is the ubuntuese version of that.
--
in VT, screen not
This fixes the problem.
** Attachment added: "makes cons.saver setgid tty"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27063128/mc.debian.patch
** Changed in: mc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: mc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Shentino (shentino)
--
in VT, screen not bei
** Changed in: mc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Shentino (shentino) => (unassigned)
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission problem to blame)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367318
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
More information:
Just did a clean install off of the new jaunty CD
Same problem
So it fails to work out of the box on a system I haven't tampered with.
IMHO it's a bug.
My assumption is that login should automatically grant the user teh
appropriate perms on the vcs files.
--
in VT, screen n
Thanks for your work. There is a new version on Debian (4.7.0), do you know if
the fix is still necessary ? I quickly backported the packages from Debian on
my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~gilir/+archive/unstable) if you need to test it.
Also it will be nice if you can give us a link of the upstre
I just test installed the package and the buggy behavior persists.
As far as Fedora, I really don't know which commit it was. It was just
mentioned in the change log. It was possibly reverted or perhaps never
was done in the ubuntu fork, since it was likely a fedora specific
issue.
Honestly, I'
I also took a look at the PPA you linked to, and it appears that
cons.saver isn't even present at all, let alone with the wrong
permissions.
Just to be clear, I'm not a developer, just an annoyed end user. My
apologies if I'm not much more help.
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25996444/Dependencies.txt
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission problem to blame)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367318
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
Just wanted to note this problem was in spite of a fresh distro upgrade
from intrepid.
The bug was there too.
I used the same workaround.
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission problem to blame)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367318
You received this bug notification because you are
Just thought though of one thing that MC *could* do in the meantime, as
a workaround.
Since an inaccessible /dev/vcsa device prevents MC from properly saving
and restoring the screen when using C-O to flip flop to and from the
subshell, methinks that MC should be able to recognize a permission
pro
Another workaround: Install fp-compile to get the grab_vcsa
IMO still a bug. I think that mc should work "out of the box",
including subshell screen save/restore. At the least, I'd consider it
an unexpected annoyance that a regular end user (i.e., one who's not a
geek) would be somewhat at a lo
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: mc
Release: Jaunty Jackalope
Version of MC: Current as of apr 26, 2009
Expected:
- MC able to save and restore the shell screen
+ MC able to save and restore the subshell screen
Actual:
MC blanks out
- Detail:
+ To reproduce
Another workaround that seems like The Right Way (tm):
Make cons.saver sgid tty.
I observed in the changelog in the source that a similiar move was done
to accomodate Fedora 7, by making cons.saver suid vcsa. It would appear
that sgid tty is the ubuntuese version of that.
--
in VT, screen not
This fixes the problem.
** Attachment added: "makes cons.saver setgid tty"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27063128/mc.debian.patch
** Changed in: mc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: mc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Shentino (shentino)
--
in VT, screen not bei
** Changed in: mc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Shentino (shentino) => (unassigned)
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission problem to blame)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367318
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Just thought though of one thing that MC *could* do in the meantime, as
a workaround.
Since an inaccessible /dev/vcsa device prevents MC from properly saving
and restoring the screen when using C-O to flip flop to and from the
subshell, methinks that MC should be able to recognize a permission
pro
Another workaround: Install fp-compile to get the grab_vcsa
IMO still a bug. I think that mc should work "out of the box",
including subshell screen save/restore. At the least, I'd consider it
an unexpected annoyance that a regular end user (i.e., one who's not a
geek) would be somewhat at a lo
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: mc
Release: Jaunty Jackalope
Version of MC: Current as of apr 26, 2009
Expected:
- MC able to save and restore the shell screen
+ MC able to save and restore the subshell screen
Actual:
MC blanks out
- Detail:
+ To reproduce
Another workaround that seems like The Right Way (tm):
Make cons.saver sgid tty.
I observed in the changelog in the source that a similiar move was done
to accomodate Fedora 7, by making cons.saver suid vcsa. It would appear
that sgid tty is the ubuntuese version of that.
--
in VT, screen not
This fixes the problem.
** Attachment added: "makes cons.saver setgid tty"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27063128/mc.debian.patch
** Changed in: mc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: mc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Shentino (shentino)
--
in VT, screen not bei
** Changed in: mc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Shentino (shentino) => (unassigned)
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission problem to blame)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367318
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Thanks for your work. There is a new version on Debian (4.7.0), do you know if
the fix is still necessary ? I quickly backported the packages from Debian on
my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~gilir/+archive/unstable) if you need to test it.
Also it will be nice if you can give us a link of the upstre
I just test installed the package and the buggy behavior persists.
As far as Fedora, I really don't know which commit it was. It was just
mentioned in the change log. It was possibly reverted or perhaps never
was done in the ubuntu fork, since it was likely a fedora specific
issue.
Honestly, I'
I also took a look at the PPA you linked to, and it appears that
cons.saver isn't even present at all, let alone with the wrong
permissions.
Just to be clear, I'm not a developer, just an annoyed end user. My
apologies if I'm not much more help.
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission
Thanks for your work. There is a new version on Debian (4.7.0), do you know if
the fix is still necessary ? I quickly backported the packages from Debian on
my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~gilir/+archive/unstable) if you need to test it.
Also it will be nice if you can give us a link of the upstre
I just test installed the package and the buggy behavior persists.
As far as Fedora, I really don't know which commit it was. It was just
mentioned in the change log. It was possibly reverted or perhaps never
was done in the ubuntu fork, since it was likely a fedora specific
issue.
Honestly, I'
I also took a look at the PPA you linked to, and it appears that
cons.saver isn't even present at all, let alone with the wrong
permissions.
Just to be clear, I'm not a developer, just an annoyed end user. My
apologies if I'm not much more help.
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission
Thanks for your work. There is a new version on Debian (4.7.0), do you know if
the fix is still necessary ? I quickly backported the packages from Debian on
my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~gilir/+archive/unstable) if you need to test it.
Also it will be nice if you can give us a link of the upstre
I just test installed the package and the buggy behavior persists.
As far as Fedora, I really don't know which commit it was. It was just
mentioned in the change log. It was possibly reverted or perhaps never
was done in the ubuntu fork, since it was likely a fedora specific
issue.
Honestly, I'
I also took a look at the PPA you linked to, and it appears that
cons.saver isn't even present at all, let alone with the wrong
permissions.
Just to be clear, I'm not a developer, just an annoyed end user. My
apologies if I'm not much more help.
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission
Thanks for your work. There is a new version on Debian (4.7.0), do you know if
the fix is still necessary ? I quickly backported the packages from Debian on
my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~gilir/+archive/unstable) if you need to test it.
Also it will be nice if you can give us a link of the upstre
I just test installed the package and the buggy behavior persists.
As far as Fedora, I really don't know which commit it was. It was just
mentioned in the change log. It was possibly reverted or perhaps never
was done in the ubuntu fork, since it was likely a fedora specific
issue.
Honestly, I'
I also took a look at the PPA you linked to, and it appears that
cons.saver isn't even present at all, let alone with the wrong
permissions.
Just to be clear, I'm not a developer, just an annoyed end user. My
apologies if I'm not much more help.
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission
Thanks for your work. There is a new version on Debian (4.7.0), do you know if
the fix is still necessary ? I quickly backported the packages from Debian on
my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~gilir/+archive/unstable) if you need to test it.
Also it will be nice if you can give us a link of the upstre
I just test installed the package and the buggy behavior persists.
As far as Fedora, I really don't know which commit it was. It was just
mentioned in the change log. It was possibly reverted or perhaps never
was done in the ubuntu fork, since it was likely a fedora specific
issue.
Honestly, I'
I also took a look at the PPA you linked to, and it appears that
cons.saver isn't even present at all, let alone with the wrong
permissions.
Just to be clear, I'm not a developer, just an annoyed end user. My
apologies if I'm not much more help.
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission
Thanks for your work. There is a new version on Debian (4.7.0), do you know if
the fix is still necessary ? I quickly backported the packages from Debian on
my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~gilir/+archive/unstable) if you need to test it.
Also it will be nice if you can give us a link of the upstre
I just test installed the package and the buggy behavior persists.
As far as Fedora, I really don't know which commit it was. It was just
mentioned in the change log. It was possibly reverted or perhaps never
was done in the ubuntu fork, since it was likely a fedora specific
issue.
Honestly, I'
I also took a look at the PPA you linked to, and it appears that
cons.saver isn't even present at all, let alone with the wrong
permissions.
Just to be clear, I'm not a developer, just an annoyed end user. My
apologies if I'm not much more help.
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission
Thanks for your work. There is a new version on Debian (4.7.0), do you know if
the fix is still necessary ? I quickly backported the packages from Debian on
my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~gilir/+archive/unstable) if you need to test it.
Also it will be nice if you can give us a link of the upstre
I just test installed the package and the buggy behavior persists.
As far as Fedora, I really don't know which commit it was. It was just
mentioned in the change log. It was possibly reverted or perhaps never
was done in the ubuntu fork, since it was likely a fedora specific
issue.
Honestly, I'
I also took a look at the PPA you linked to, and it appears that
cons.saver isn't even present at all, let alone with the wrong
permissions.
Just to be clear, I'm not a developer, just an annoyed end user. My
apologies if I'm not much more help.
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission
Thanks for your work. There is a new version on Debian (4.7.0), do you know if
the fix is still necessary ? I quickly backported the packages from Debian on
my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~gilir/+archive/unstable) if you need to test it.
Also it will be nice if you can give us a link of the upstre
I just test installed the package and the buggy behavior persists.
As far as Fedora, I really don't know which commit it was. It was just
mentioned in the change log. It was possibly reverted or perhaps never
was done in the ubuntu fork, since it was likely a fedora specific
issue.
Honestly, I'
I also took a look at the PPA you linked to, and it appears that
cons.saver isn't even present at all, let alone with the wrong
permissions.
Just to be clear, I'm not a developer, just an annoyed end user. My
apologies if I'm not much more help.
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission
Thanks for your work. There is a new version on Debian (4.7.0), do you know if
the fix is still necessary ? I quickly backported the packages from Debian on
my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~gilir/+archive/unstable) if you need to test it.
Also it will be nice if you can give us a link of the upstre
I just test installed the package and the buggy behavior persists.
As far as Fedora, I really don't know which commit it was. It was just
mentioned in the change log. It was possibly reverted or perhaps never
was done in the ubuntu fork, since it was likely a fedora specific
issue.
Honestly, I'
I also took a look at the PPA you linked to, and it appears that
cons.saver isn't even present at all, let alone with the wrong
permissions.
Just to be clear, I'm not a developer, just an annoyed end user. My
apologies if I'm not much more help.
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission
Thanks for your work. There is a new version on Debian (4.7.0), do you know if
the fix is still necessary ? I quickly backported the packages from Debian on
my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~gilir/+archive/unstable) if you need to test it.
Also it will be nice if you can give us a link of the upstre
I just test installed the package and the buggy behavior persists.
As far as Fedora, I really don't know which commit it was. It was just
mentioned in the change log. It was possibly reverted or perhaps never
was done in the ubuntu fork, since it was likely a fedora specific
issue.
Honestly, I'
I also took a look at the PPA you linked to, and it appears that
cons.saver isn't even present at all, let alone with the wrong
permissions.
Just to be clear, I'm not a developer, just an annoyed end user. My
apologies if I'm not much more help.
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission
Thanks for your work. There is a new version on Debian (4.7.0), do you know if
the fix is still necessary ? I quickly backported the packages from Debian on
my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~gilir/+archive/unstable) if you need to test it.
Also it will be nice if you can give us a link of the upstre
I just test installed the package and the buggy behavior persists.
As far as Fedora, I really don't know which commit it was. It was just
mentioned in the change log. It was possibly reverted or perhaps never
was done in the ubuntu fork, since it was likely a fedora specific
issue.
Honestly, I'
I also took a look at the PPA you linked to, and it appears that
cons.saver isn't even present at all, let alone with the wrong
permissions.
Just to be clear, I'm not a developer, just an annoyed end user. My
apologies if I'm not much more help.
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission
Thanks for your work. There is a new version on Debian (4.7.0), do you know if
the fix is still necessary ? I quickly backported the packages from Debian on
my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~gilir/+archive/unstable) if you need to test it.
Also it will be nice if you can give us a link of the upstre
I just test installed the package and the buggy behavior persists.
As far as Fedora, I really don't know which commit it was. It was just
mentioned in the change log. It was possibly reverted or perhaps never
was done in the ubuntu fork, since it was likely a fedora specific
issue.
Honestly, I'
I also took a look at the PPA you linked to, and it appears that
cons.saver isn't even present at all, let alone with the wrong
permissions.
Just to be clear, I'm not a developer, just an annoyed end user. My
apologies if I'm not much more help.
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission
Thanks for your work. There is a new version on Debian (4.7.0), do you know if
the fix is still necessary ? I quickly backported the packages from Debian on
my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~gilir/+archive/unstable) if you need to test it.
Also it will be nice if you can give us a link of the upstre
I just test installed the package and the buggy behavior persists.
As far as Fedora, I really don't know which commit it was. It was just
mentioned in the change log. It was possibly reverted or perhaps never
was done in the ubuntu fork, since it was likely a fedora specific
issue.
Honestly, I'
I also took a look at the PPA you linked to, and it appears that
cons.saver isn't even present at all, let alone with the wrong
permissions.
Just to be clear, I'm not a developer, just an annoyed end user. My
apologies if I'm not much more help.
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission
Thanks for your work. There is a new version on Debian (4.7.0), do you know if
the fix is still necessary ? I quickly backported the packages from Debian on
my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~gilir/+archive/unstable) if you need to test it.
Also it will be nice if you can give us a link of the upstre
I just test installed the package and the buggy behavior persists.
As far as Fedora, I really don't know which commit it was. It was just
mentioned in the change log. It was possibly reverted or perhaps never
was done in the ubuntu fork, since it was likely a fedora specific
issue.
Honestly, I'
I also took a look at the PPA you linked to, and it appears that
cons.saver isn't even present at all, let alone with the wrong
permissions.
Just to be clear, I'm not a developer, just an annoyed end user. My
apologies if I'm not much more help.
--
in VT, screen not being saved (vcsa permission
Thanks for your work. There is a new version on Debian (4.7.0), do you know if
the fix is still necessary ? I quickly backported the packages from Debian on
my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~gilir/+archive/unstable) if you need to test it.
Also it will be nice if you can give us a link of the upstre
1 - 100 of 1861 matches
Mail list logo
