[Bug 367520] Re: Very slow suspend-to-ram, poor VM allocation

2010-08-11 Thread Jeremy Foshee
This bug report was marked as Incomplete and has not had any updated comments for quite some time. As a result this bug is being closed. Please reopen if this is still an issue in the current Ubuntu release http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download . Also, please be sure to provide any requested in

[Bug 367520] Re: Very slow suspend-to-ram, poor VM allocation

2010-02-01 Thread ^_Pepe_^
Chris, Thanks for your comments and your help. I'm going to mark this bug as closed, since you don't have the opportunity to test this hardware nomore. I'm sorry about your computer -- Very slow suspend-to-ram, poor VM allocation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367520 You received this bug not

Re: [Bug 367520] Re: Very slow suspend-to-ram, poor VM allocation

2010-01-29 Thread Chris
- From: ^_Pepe_^ To: bridgeri...@yahoo.com Sent: Wed, January 20, 2010 4:01:38 AM Subject: [Bug 367520] Re: Very slow suspend-to-ram, poor VM allocation This bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue? Can you try wi

[Bug 367520] Re: Very slow suspend-to-ram, poor VM allocation

2010-01-20 Thread ^_Pepe_^
This bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue? Can you try with the latest Karmic 9.10 release of Ubuntu? ISO CD images are available from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/ . If the issue remains, could you run t

[Bug 367520] Re: Very slow suspend-to-ram, poor VM allocation

2009-05-04 Thread Chris
** Description changed: I seem to be affected by a bug similar to (or the same as) #79599 and #290184. I'm reporting this separately because those two bugs have been marked as "Rejected" and "Invalid", in one case with the observation that the bug policy requires a new bug to be filed whe