This bug was fixed in the package nvram-wakeup - 0.97-14lenny1ubuntu0.1
---
nvram-wakeup (0.97-14lenny1ubuntu0.1) jaunty-proposed; urgency=low
* debian/patches/20_fix-xxd-overflow.dpatch: fix buffer overflow in xxd
(LP: #370261, debian bug 529074).
-- Kees CookSun, 17 May
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
nvram-wakeup buffer overflow detected
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bu
I had the same buffer overflow problem in Jaunty but the package in
jaunty-proposed has fixed it for me. Many thanks.
--
nvram-wakeup buffer overflow detected
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Accepted nvram-wakeup into jaunty-proposed, the package will build now
and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
** Changed in: nvram-wakeup (Ubunt
** Changed in: nvram-wakeup (Debian)
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
--
nvram-wakeup buffer overflow detected
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
A fixed package for Jaunty has been uploaded to -proposed. Once it is
accepted, it will need to be tested before it is published to the
-updates pocket. Thanks again for the bug report!
--
nvram-wakeup buffer overflow detected
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370261
You received this bug notifi
(While intrepid's version technically works, if it were recompiled for
another SRU, it would fail. For now, in the interests of minimal
changes and no regressions, intrepid can be skipped.)
** Changed in: nvram-wakeup (Ubuntu Jaunty)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: nvram-wak
This bug was fixed in the package nvram-wakeup - 0.99b-1ubuntu1
---
nvram-wakeup (0.99b-1ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low
* tools.c: fix buffer overflow in xxd (LP: #370261, debian bug
529074).
-- Kees CookSun, 17 May 2009 08:47:35 -0700
** Changed in: nvram-wakeup (Ubuntu Karmic
Here's the patch to fix the overflow. I've attached it to the upstream bug
report too:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2782757&group_id=35022&atid=412755
** Also affects: nvram-wakeup (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: nvram-wakeup (
you are right, but after disabling fortify, you get "stack smashing detected"
error , so it's necessary to disable stack protector too to get working
binary.
and ofcourse it's not a fix, it's just temporary workaround...
*** stack smashing detected ***: ./nvram-wakeup terminated
=== Backt
-fno-stack-protector will not change this behavior. The abort reported is from
FORTIFY. The better solution would to be to find the sprintf that is failing
and fix that bug. :) Some details:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CompilerFlags
--
nvram-wakeup buffer overflow detected
https://bugs.launchp
Since there are already 2 reports and I am the third I am marking this
one as confirmed.
** Changed in: nvram-wakeup (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
nvram-wakeup buffer overflow detected
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370261
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
hi, add it to CFLAGS variable in Makefile:
CFLAGS = -O2 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -g -pedantic
$(DEFS) -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 -fno-stack-protector
jn
On Thursday 14 of May 2009 17:35:35 raulelmagico wrote:
> servus albert,
>
> I need some help with your workaround:
>
> "temporary workaround: com
servus albert,
I need some help with your workaround:
"temporary workaround: compile with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 -fno-stack-
protector"
I don´t know how to apply that! I guess I have to add this line somewhere in
the Makefile, but I dont know how!
Im new in the Ubuntu universe, so I would be very
14 matches
Mail list logo
