Official or unofficial, there are often reasons for multiple versions of
firefox even if it's during transitions such as these. People should be
able to choose and not have a choice forced on them by packages,
especially when there's a well established system in place to give
admins and users what
I think there will only be one official firefox in each release:
http://www.asoftsite.org/s9y/archives/161-FAQ-Why-is-my-firefox-3.5-still-called-Shiretoko.html
--
add an alternative to /usr/bin/firefox
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380196
You received this bug notification because you are a me
Here's another reason why it is important to do more than a quick
symbolic link hack - the new firefox 3.0 update package overwrite
/usr/bin/firefox on my unexpectedly. The "won't fix" tag is clear but
the explanation is far from clear.
--
add an alternative to /usr/bin/firefox
https://bugs.laun
Asac, I appreciate your work on firefox and I thank you for the
information you provided today. I am passing that information along to
several user groups who all seem to want FireFox 3.5 NOW, lol. I wish
to understand your response to this bug as it seems unclear to me.
Right now the choice of
> softwares that call a browser to open a link, should all start the
latest installed version,
problem here is that alternatives dont solve the problem you are looking
for a solution here.
also it "shouldnt start the latest", but it should start the "default".
default can either be set by the dis
please dont change bug state if i set it to wont fix. this won't happen
... intentionally.
** Changed in: firefox-3.5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
add an alternative to /usr/bin/firefox
https://bugs.l
> The reason given for the "Won't Fix" status didn't seem valid to me, so
> I changed it back to "Confirmed" and added a more detailed comment. (See
> above)
> [...]
> Status: Won't Fix => Confirmed
I think you shouldn't change the bug status for a comment
clarification. I also think that if
The reason given for the "Won't Fix" status didn't seem valid to me, so
I changed it back to "Confirmed" and added a more detailed comment. (See
above)
** Changed in: firefox-3.5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Won't Fix => Confirmed
--
add an alternative to /usr/bin/firefox
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
I don't understand Mr. Sack's answer. A normal user know nothing about
alternatives, sure. But he knows that if he has "Firefox 3.0" and
installs "Firefox 3.5", that icon named "Firefox" should start "Firefox
3.5", not "Firefox 3.0". This is how it works everywhere intuitiveness
is the goal, starti
The reason given for the "Won't Fix" status didn't seem valid to me, so
I changed it back to "Confirmed" and added a more detailed comment.
** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: Won't Fix => Confirmed
--
add an alternative to /usr/bin/firefox
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380196
Y
I didn't know that only bugs affecting normal users are considered,
sorry.
--
add an alternative to /usr/bin/firefox
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380196
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubun
alternatives is nothing normal users know anything about; hence we won't
introduce it for firefox.
** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
** Changed in: firefox-3.5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
add an alternative to /usr/bin/firefox
https://bugs
confirming, if the developers find time for this, it would be great! :)
** Changed in: firefox-3.5 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
add an alternative to /usr/bin/firefox
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380196
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
13 matches
Mail list logo
