[Bug 386432] Re: Read-Only FAT files cannot be made writeable

2012-03-12 Thread Vadim Rutkovsky
We are closing this bug report because it lacks the information we need to investigate the problem, as described in the previous comments. Please reopen it if you can give us the missing information, and don't hesitate to submit bug reports in the future. To reopen the bug report you can click on

[Bug 386432] Re: Read-Only FAT files cannot be made writeable

2010-04-21 Thread Sebastien Bacher
could you try if that's still an issue in karmic or lucid? -- Read-Only FAT files cannot be made writeable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 386432] Re: Read-Only FAT files cannot be made writeable

2010-04-21 Thread Bachsau
We'll see. I'm going to upgrade in june. -- Read-Only FAT files cannot be made writeable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 386432] Re: Read-Only FAT files cannot be made writeable

2009-11-12 Thread Sense Hofstede
Does changing the umask and dmask values to something less restrictive help you? -- Read-Only FAT files cannot be made writeable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 386432] Re: Read-Only FAT files cannot be made writeable

2009-11-12 Thread Bachsau
No. The is already mounted with uid=1000,umask=0111,dmask=, but if a file is set read only in the filesystem, it is also write protected with linux for all users. This especialy happens to the My Documents and related Windows-System folders, after Windows has done changes to them. Running

[Bug 386432] Re: Read-Only FAT files cannot be made writeable

2009-06-16 Thread Bachsau
Sorry, I don't know more about this bug than I already posted. Create a FAT32 file system, set a file read-only, mount the file system with the parameters given in my first post (they should be okay I think), and try to set the file writeable with nautilus. -- Read-Only FAT files cannot be made

[Bug 386432] Re: Read-Only FAT files cannot be made writeable

2009-06-13 Thread Bachsau
lol. Just recreate the situation described and you will reproduce the bug. And no, it's nothing for the wishlist. Its something that doesnt work. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- Read-Only FAT files cannot be made writeable

[Bug 386432] Re: Read-Only FAT files cannot be made writeable

2009-06-13 Thread Sebastien Bacher
the bug tracker is not a forum for lol comments, if you want this bug to be useful what about replying to questions? ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- Read-Only FAT files cannot be made writeable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386432 You received this

[Bug 386432] Re: Read-Only FAT files cannot be made writeable

2009-06-12 Thread Bachsau
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27830715/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27830716/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27830717/ProcStatus.txt -- Read-Only

[Bug 386432] Re: Read-Only FAT files cannot be made writeable

2009-06-12 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
Thanks for your report, that's something to send directly upstream at http://bugzilla.gnome.org by someone interested on that, for forwarding instructions please read http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Upstream/GNOME, Thanks in advance. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided =

[Bug 386432] Re: Read-Only FAT files cannot be made writeable

2009-06-12 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please answer these questions: * Is this reproducible? * If so, what specific steps should we take to recreate this bug? This will help us to find and resolve the problem. ** Changed in: nautilus