2009/7/24 Steve Kowalik :
> I have unblacklisted the packages.
Many thanks Steve!
Yours,
d.
--
Karmic: please do NOT synchronize following packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I have unblacklisted the packages.
** Changed in: ocaml (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
Karmic: please do NOT synchronize following packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Hello Steve,
2009/7/23 Steve Kowalik :
> Since we are now past Debian Import Freeze, you will need to file sync
> requests to have the packages updated in Karmic.
I already, filed such a sync request for the first round of the transition:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ocaml/+bug/402
Since we are now past Debian Import Freeze, you will need to file sync
requests to have the packages updated in Karmic. If they have no Ubuntu
changes just listing the packages is fine, but we will require a list.
--
Karmic: please do NOT synchronize following packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
Hello,
Please cancel all sync-blacklist for ocaml related packages to allow
transition to 3.11.1 in Karmic.
Bug re-opened following Laney suggestion on #ubuntu-motu.
Yours,
d?
** Changed in: ocaml (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Confirmed
--
Karmic: please do NOT synchronize followin
Hello Steve,
2009/7/20 Steve Kowalik :
> Surely unilaterally blocking updates to a large number of source
> packages is just going to make other transitions harder? For example,
> the librpm4.4 -> librpm0 is now blocked by this.
This blocking was discussed on ubuntu-devel-disc...@. Should I have
Surely unilaterally blocking updates to a large number of source
packages is just going to make other transitions harder? For example,
the librpm4.4 -> librpm0 is now blocked by this.
--
Karmic: please do NOT synchronize following packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387943
You received this
Hello Colin,
Thank you for the sync-blacklist. I have read your remark regarding
the ability to change that in a near future.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 18:29, Colin Watson wrote:
> FWIW the current sync blacklist is here: http://people.ubuntu.com
> /~ubuntu-archive/sync-blacklist.txt
That's useful
FWIW the current sync blacklist is here: http://people.ubuntu.com
/~ubuntu-archive/sync-blacklist.txt
--
Karmic: please do NOT synchronize following packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
A blacklist is easy to install and easy to remove; a transition somewhat
less so - so I've no objection to blacklisting these for the time being,
and have done so. If you want this undone following discussion, just let
us know.
** Changed in: ocaml (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
Hello Andrew,
Andrew Starr-Bochicchio writes:
> Does Debian have a time table they are looking at to transition to
> 3.11.1?
Sorry, no precise time table except that it took 1.5 months for the last
transition.
> Looking at the comparison between unstable and Karmic [1], only
> a handful of pa
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 17:28, Iain Lane wrote:
> Does the Debian team have any estimate of how long the transition is
> likely to take?
Last transition took 1.5 months but it was a bigger one than this:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-ocaml-maint/2009/06/msg00105.html
> Once you have this time
Hi David,
Does Debian have a time table they are looking at to transition to
3.11.1? Looking at the comparison between unstable and Karmic [1], only
a handful of packages seem to have Ubuntu local changes. OCaml Task
Force transition page doesn't seem to mention a time frame. [2] As Iain
notes abo
Hi,
Thanks for caring for this set of packages.
On 16 Jun 2009, at 16:05, David MENTRÉ wrote:
> ...
> I'm not saying it cannot be done but *I* cannot commit to do it over
> this time period. As I am the only one, as far as I know, to care
> about this I don't want to commit to things that I cann
Hello Iain,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 16:48, Iain Lane wrote:
> I'm interested in why you feel this cannot be done for Karmic.
I'm not saying it cannot be done but *I* cannot commit to do it over
this time period. As I am the only one, as far as I know, to care
about this I don't want to commit to
I'm interested in why you feel this cannot be done for Karmic. There is
still a fairly long time[0] before the first major freeze
(FeatureFreeze), and blacklisting a whole swathe of packages from being
synced seems a rather heavyweight solution. Is there no realistic chance
that this will be done i
** Attachment added: "List of source packages to block"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27992673/ocaml-src-pkg-to-block-list.txt
--
Karmic: please do NOT synchronize following packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
17 matches
Mail list logo