[Bug 388109] Re: incorrect rule in usb_modeswitch.rules for 19d2:2000

2010-02-23 Thread Didier Raboud
This is most probably fixed in usb-modeswitch-data 20100127-1, actually in Lucid. Best regards, OdyX ** Package changed: usb-modeswitch (Ubuntu) => usb-modeswitch-data (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: usb-modeswitch-data (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- incorrect rule in usb_mod

Re: [Bug 388109] Re: incorrect rule in usb_modeswitch.rules for 19d2:2000

2009-08-13 Thread Id2ndR
> Please file a bug at upstream's bts: > http://www.draisberghof.de/usb_modeswitch/bb Done here : http://www.draisberghof.de/usb_modeswitch/bb/viewtopic.php?t=202 Hope this will help them. -- incorrect rule in usb_modeswitch.rules for 19d2:2000 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388109 You receiv

[Bug 388109] Re: incorrect rule in usb_modeswitch.rules for 19d2:2000

2009-08-09 Thread Didier Raboud
Hi Id2ndr, Please file a bug at upstream's bts: http://www.draisberghof.de/usb_modeswitch/bb Regards, OdyX -- incorrect rule in usb_modeswitch.rules for 19d2:2000 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388109 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscr

[Bug 388109] Re: incorrect rule in usb_modeswitch.rules for 19d2:2000

2009-08-09 Thread Id2ndR
I've got an ZTE K3565-Z usb modem (same product and vendor id : 19d2:2000). Target ids are 19d2:0052. I get it working in jaunty, and at least recognize in karmic (is modemmanager preventing me to get it connected ?). following instructions of https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/77675.

[Bug 388109] Re: incorrect rule in usb_modeswitch.rules for 19d2:2000

2009-08-03 Thread Didier Raboud
Hi again, I committed a patch to the git repository. It will be part of next upload (due in some days probably). http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/usb- modeswitch.git;h=26848ac72b1fbf716ce5fc5b29254dd86f6fc407 Best regards, OdyX ** Changed in: usb-modeswitch (Ubuntu) Status: New => F

[Bug 388109] Re: incorrect rule in usb_modeswitch.rules for 19d2:2000

2009-08-03 Thread Didier Raboud
Exactly this ! Thank you ! I will prepare a patch with your new rule and it will be part of the next upload to Debian (and then I don't know how it ends in Ubuntu...) Regards, OdyX -- incorrect rule in usb_modeswitch.rules for 19d2:2000 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388109 You received this b

[Bug 388109] Re: incorrect rule in usb_modeswitch.rules for 19d2:2000

2009-08-03 Thread Cleber Santz
I don't understand exactly what "name" you want: in LSUSB says "ONDA Communication S.p.A.", in the BOX says "ZTE MF 636 3G Modem" . Regards, Cleber -- incorrect rule in usb_modeswitch.rules for 19d2:2000 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388109 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 388109] Re: incorrect rule in usb_modeswitch.rules for 19d2:2000

2009-08-03 Thread Didier Raboud
Hi, I am considering to add a configuration entry for your device (which you'll have to activate manually). What is your device (I don't want the VendorID, but a "name" which refers to that device easily) ? Regards, OdyX -- incorrect rule in usb_modeswitch.rules for 19d2:2000 https://bugs.laun

[Bug 388109] Re: incorrect rule in usb_modeswitch.rules for 19d2:2000

2009-06-25 Thread Cleber Santz
Hi Didier, version 1.0.2 didn't solve the problem. -- incorrect rule in usb_modeswitch.rules for 19d2:2000 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388109 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@li

[Bug 388109] Re: incorrect rule in usb_modeswitch.rules for 19d2:2000

2009-06-24 Thread Didier Raboud
I will try to give a closer look to this bug soon. Note that 1.0.2-1 went uploaded to Debian today. You might want to try this new version (even though I don't think it might help). ** Changed in: usb-modeswitch (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Didier Raboud (odyx) -- incorrect rule in us