[Bug 403808] Re: fail2ban not execute command to start jail

2014-01-23 Thread Jamie Strandboge
This was fixed in 0.8.5-2, which has been in Ubuntu since before 12.04. Marking Fix Released. ** Changed in: fail2ban (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Bug 403808] Re: fail2ban not execute command to start jail

2014-01-23 Thread Daniel Black
This was bug https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/issues/51 Correct fix that has been in debian for a while https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/commit/9c4b0418218d150f763e46236631c22c32ee134e Daniel fail2ban dev -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whi

[Bug 403808] Re: fail2ban not execute command to start jail

2011-10-14 Thread a7x
Bug still present in fail2ban-0.8.5-1 (in oneiric). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403808 Title: fail2ban not execute command to start jail To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 403808] Re: fail2ban not execute command to start jail

2011-07-29 Thread Daniel T Chen
** Changed in: fail2ban (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: fail2ban (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403808 Title: fail

[Bug 403808] Re: fail2ban not execute command to start jail

2011-04-30 Thread MaxNegro
Again, patch proposed in #2 does fix the issue reliably, at least on every system I've applied it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403808 Title: fail2ban not execute command to start j

[Bug 403808] Re: fail2ban not execute command to start jail

2011-04-30 Thread MaxNegro
Confirmed in natty. To reproduce, enable more than a couple of jails in jail.conf and do a restart of the service. ** Changed in: fail2ban (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https

[Bug 403808] Re: fail2ban not execute command to start jail

2011-04-09 Thread MaxNegro
Why is it marked incomplete, following a request for more info based on a version which is not yet released? The bug is present in lucid and maverick, there is a workaround and the info for reproducing are present... Anyway, I'm going to test it on natty ASAP. -- You received this bug notificati

[Bug 403808] Re: fail2ban not execute command to start jail

2011-04-03 Thread Dave Walker
Hi, Can anyone confirm if this bug is present in Natty please? ** Changed in: fail2ban (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403808 Title: fail2ban

[Bug 403808] Re: fail2ban not execute command to start jail

2011-02-28 Thread MaxNegro
Bug still present in Maverick. Proposed workaround (patching /usr/bin /fail2ban-client) does solve the problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403808 Title: fail2ban not execute comma

[Bug 403808] Re: fail2ban not execute command to start jail

2010-09-26 Thread Martitza
The sleep(0.1) described above (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fail2ban/+bug/403808/comments/2) appears to work on both my Karmic and Lucid boxes. I don't mind adding a few seconds to booting. But this does seem like a brittle fix. A better solution would be a handshake with a finite

[Bug 403808] Re: fail2ban not execute command to start jail

2010-08-15 Thread bsgcic
I was trying to nominate this for lucid and mistakenly nominated for past releases. I do not see how I can remove nominations for the older releases after I have nominated them. I see that this has already been nominated for Karmic and Lucid by the fail2ban team. -- fail2ban not execute command t

[Bug 403808] Re: fail2ban not execute command to start jail

2010-08-15 Thread bsgcic
I was getting the same behavior as the reporter of this bug (Mike) and when I finally found this page and realized that this is an bug of fail2ban itself. My system is Ubuntu 10.04 with 0.8.4-1ubuntu1 version of the fail2ban package for Ubuntu. I just added the time.sleep(0.1) line to /usr/bin/fa

[Bug 403808] Re: fail2ban not execute command to start jail

2010-07-15 Thread Pawel Barcik
It is caused by iptables, and the solution is here at the end of the page: http://www.fail2ban.org/wiki/index.php/Fail2ban_talk:Community_Portal "fail2ban.action.action ERROR on startup/restart I had multiple fail2ban.action.action ERROR on startup/restart. It seems there was a "race" condition

[Bug 403808] Re: fail2ban not execute command to start jail

2010-02-20 Thread Mitch Towner
Invalidated wrongly set tasks. @ Fail2Ban: Please do not add new tasks to bug reports or nominate for release without commenting to advise why you have done this. Thanks in advance! ** Changed in: iptables (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: fail2ban (Arch Linux) Stat

[Bug 403808] Re: fail2ban not execute command to start jail

2010-02-20 Thread Mitch Towner
** Tags removed: fail2ban -- fail2ban not execute command to start jail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu

[Bug 403808] Re: fail2ban not execute command to start jail

2010-02-19 Thread Fail2Ban
** Tags added: fail2ban ** Also affects: fail2ban (Debian) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: fail2ban (Mandriva) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: fail2ban (Suse) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: fail2ban (Arch Li