[Bug 409438] Re: Multi-user sec=krb5 NFSv4 client blocks when one user has an expired ticket

2022-03-24 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: nfs-utils (Debian) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409438 Title: Multi-user sec=krb5 NFSv4 client blocks when one user has an expired

[Bug 409438] Re: Multi-user sec=krb5 NFSv4 client blocks when one user has an expired ticket

2011-07-08 Thread Laurent Bonnaud
This bug also exists in RedHat: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537193 I would have liked to link both bugs but unfortunately launchpad does not know about the RedHat distribution. ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #537193 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537193

[Bug 409438] Re: Multi-user sec=krb5 NFSv4 client blocks when one user has an expired ticket

2011-07-08 Thread Juha Erkkilä
I am seeing a very similar issue with Ubuntu Lucid release. In my tests the kerberos ticket does not actually need to expire, instead it is enough if it is simply destroyed or removed from the filesystem. See http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-nfs/msg22430.html for more information. -- You recei

[Bug 409438] Re: Multi-user sec=krb5 NFSv4 client blocks when one user has an expired ticket

2010-07-12 Thread Laurent Bonnaud
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- Multi-user sec=krb5 NFSv4 client blocks when one user has an expired ticket https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409438 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 409438] Re: Multi-user sec=krb5 NFSv4 client blocks when one user has an expired ticket

2010-07-12 Thread Laurent Bonnaud
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 16:40 +, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > > Then I don't understand why you reopened the bug here. Because it had expired and had not been marked as fixed. > For the record, I > haven't been able to reproduce this problem on lucid.. Great news, thanks for the info ! I am looki

[Bug 409438] Re: Multi-user sec=krb5 NFSv4 client blocks when one user has an expired ticket

2010-07-02 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Then I don't understand why you reopened the bug here. For the record, I haven't been able to reproduce this problem on lucid.. -- Multi-user sec=krb5 NFSv4 client blocks when one user has an expired ticket https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409438 You received this bug notification because you are

Re: [Bug 409438] Re: Multi-user sec=krb5 NFSv4 client blocks when one user has an expired ticket

2010-07-02 Thread Laurent Bonnaud
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 09:27 +, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > Did you mean to say 'squeeze'? Lenny is old. No, I really meant "lenny". With "squeeze", mounting with Kerberos does not even work (see my post to the Linux-NFS mailing list :>). -- Laurent Bonnaud. -- Multi-user sec=krb5 NFSv4 client

[Bug 409438] Re: Multi-user sec=krb5 NFSv4 client blocks when one user has an expired ticket

2010-07-02 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Did you mean to say 'squeeze'? Lenny is old. -- Multi-user sec=krb5 NFSv4 client blocks when one user has an expired ticket https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409438 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing li

[Bug 409438] Re: Multi-user sec=krb5 NFSv4 client blocks when one user has an expired ticket

2010-06-30 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: nfs-utils (Debian) Status: Unknown => New -- Multi-user sec=krb5 NFSv4 client blocks when one user has an expired ticket https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409438 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubu

[Bug 409438] Re: Multi-user sec=krb5 NFSv4 client blocks when one user has an expired ticket

2010-06-30 Thread Laurent Bonnaud
For reference I am adding this thread that contains more info from the submitter: http://linux-nfs.org/pipermail/nfsv4/2009-November/011598.html -- Multi-user sec=krb5 NFSv4 client blocks when one user has an expired ticket https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409438 You received this bug notificat

[Bug 409438] Re: Multi-user sec=krb5 NFSv4 client blocks when one user has an expired ticket

2010-06-30 Thread Laurent Bonnaud
I have the same problem with Debian lenny as NFS server and NFS client. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => Confirmed ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #446238 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=446238 ** Also affects: nfs-utils (Debian) via http://b

[Bug 409438] Re: Multi-user sec=krb5 NFSv4 client blocks when one user has an expired ticket

2010-05-25 Thread Jeremy Foshee
This bug report was marked as Incomplete and has not had any updated comments for quite some time. As a result this bug is being closed. Please reopen if this is still an issue in the current Ubuntu release http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download . Also, please be sure to provide any requested in

[Bug 409438] Re: Multi-user sec=krb5 NFSv4 client blocks when one user has an expired ticket

2010-02-10 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Could you try the patches mentioned here: http://linux-nfs.org/pipermail/nfsv4/2010-February/012075.html They might help here too. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- Multi-user sec=krb5 NFSv4 client blocks when one user has an expired ticket https://bugs.launchpa

[Bug 409438] Re: Multi-user sec=krb5 NFSv4 client blocks when one user has an expired ticket

2009-10-29 Thread Neil Hoggarth
I have recently set up an Ubuntu 9.10 release candidate system for testing, and I am able to reproduce this problem there, too. My new test system does not us the automounter - I encounter the same problem with a statically (fstab) mounted NFS4 sec=krb5 home directory tree and two kerberised lo

[Bug 409438] Re: Multi-user sec=krb5 NFSv4 client blocks when one user has an expired ticket

2009-08-11 Thread kernel-janitor
[This is an automated message. Apologies if it has reached you inappropriately.] This bug was reported against the linux-meta package when it likely should have been reported against the linux package instead. We are automatically transitioning this to the linux kernel package so that the approp