[Bug 409803] Re: [MIR] Please promote liblauncher

2010-01-26 Thread Loïc Minier
Filed bug #512724 to track the wncksync MIR. -- [MIR] Please promote liblauncher https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409803 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://li

[Bug 409803] Re: [MIR] Please promote liblauncher

2010-01-25 Thread Emmet Hikory
liblauncher FTBFS due to ogre-model issues, because it can't find libwncksync-dev. No MIR appears to have been ever filed for wncksync. This should probably be demoted or wncksync promoted. -- [MIR] Please promote liblauncher https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409803 You received this bug notifica

[Bug 409803] Re: [MIR] Please promote liblauncher

2009-08-07 Thread Steve Kowalik
I've now promoted liblauncher. ** Changed in: liblauncher (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released ** Changed in: liblauncher (Ubuntu) Assignee: Alexander Sack (asac) => (unassigned) -- [MIR] Please promote liblauncher https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409803 You received this

Re: [Bug 409803] Re: [MIR] Please promote liblauncher

2009-08-06 Thread Alexander Sack
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 09:24:14PM -, Martin Pitt wrote: > Alexander Sack [2009-08-06 16:32 -]: > > 1. include version in -dev package name (i was told that you want to > > have both in an archive at the same time) > > Why would you have two API versions of such a small library at the > sa

Re: [Bug 409803] Re: [MIR] Please promote liblauncher

2009-08-06 Thread Alexander Sack
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 09:24:14PM -, Martin Pitt wrote: > Alexander Sack [2009-08-06 16:32 -]: > > 1. include version in -dev package name (i was told that you want to > > have both in an archive at the same time) > > Why would you have two API versions of such a small library at the > sa

Re: [Bug 409803] Re: [MIR] Please promote liblauncher

2009-08-06 Thread Martin Pitt
Alexander Sack [2009-08-06 16:32 -]: > 1. include version in -dev package name (i was told that you want to > have both in an archive at the same time) Why would you have two API versions of such a small library at the same time? -- [MIR] Please promote liblauncher https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Bug 409803] Re: [MIR] Please promote liblauncher

2009-08-06 Thread Alexander Sack
approved. please consider the following improvements still: 1. include version in -dev package name (i was told that you want to have both in an archive at the same time) 2. drop the ubuntu revision from the version in the symbols file (forgot to tell that.) ** Changed in: liblauncher (Ubuntu)

[Bug 409803] Re: [MIR] Please promote liblauncher

2009-08-06 Thread Alexander Sack
** Summary changed: - [MIR] Please promote liblauncher and clutk + [MIR] Please promote liblauncher -- [MIR] Please promote liblauncher https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409803 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-b

[Bug 409803] Re: [MIR] Please promote liblauncher and clutk

2009-08-06 Thread Martin Pitt
** Changed in: liblauncher (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Alexander Sack (asac) -- [MIR] Please promote liblauncher and clutk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409803 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 409803] Re: [MIR] Please promote liblauncher and clutk

2009-08-06 Thread Steve Kowalik
Damn, missed: * Does it directly (not through a library) process binary (video, audio, etc) or structured (PDF, etc) data ? No, it doesn't. -- [MIR] Please promote liblauncher and clutk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409803 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu