** Also affects: pld-linux
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: pld-linux
Status: New = Fix Released
--
karmic: Compiling php fails with autoconf 2.64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server
** Also affects: pld-linux
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: pld-linux
Status: New = Fix Released
--
karmic: Compiling php fails with autoconf 2.64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Most likely divert numbering conflicts with autoconf internal one. I
just cooked such patch that fixes the autoconf 2.64 problem for me:
http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-
bin/cvsweb/packages/php/php-m4-divert.patch?rev=1.1 . Same way works for
php4.
--
karmic: Compiling php fails with autoconf 2.64
Hi,
Why did you drop the dependency on automake1.4?
Thanks,
James
--
karmic: Compiling php fails with autoconf 2.64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu.
--
Hi,
Why did you drop the dependency on automake1.4?
Thanks,
James
--
karmic: Compiling php fails with autoconf 2.64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
This bug was fixed in the package php5 - 5.2.10.dfsg.1-2ubuntu1
---
php5 (5.2.10.dfsg.1-2ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low
* Merge from debian unstable, remaining changes:
- debian/control, debian/rules: Disable a few build dependencies and
accompanying, binary packages which
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:26 PM, James Westbyjw+deb...@jameswestby.net wrote:
Why did you drop the dependency on automake1.4?
That's a rookie mistake as i had believed that autoconf2.13 depends
upon automake1.4. But automake is not a dependancy - its a
'recommends'. Thanks for picking that up.
@dreamcat4: Thanks for doing all the research and actual thinking in
this matter!
Making autoconf2.13 an explicit build dependency (instead of merely
autoconf) does make php5 build nicely. I generated new source packages
with this change, and built it without any trouble inside a pbuilder
chroot.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Andreas Olssonandr...@arrakis.se wrote:
autoconf) does make php5 build nicely. I generated new source packages
with this change, and built it without any trouble inside a pbuilder
chroot.
Well, this is fantastic. I've been puzzled and frustrated over this
error
** Attachment added: php5_5.2.10.dfsg.1-1ubuntu2.debdiff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/3049/php5_5.2.10.dfsg.1-1ubuntu2.debdiff
--
karmic: Compiling php fails with autoconf 2.64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Also, according to the (not entirely new) comment to
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=46744
Even using the SVN version of PHP autoconf 2.13 seems like the prefered
choice: http://www.php.net/svn.php
** Bug watch added: bugs.php.net/ #46744
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=46744
--
karmic:
Ok, let me try again...
Also, according to the (not entirely new) comment to
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=46744 autoconf 2.13 it sounds as if 2.13
is the only supported version of autoconf.
Even using the SVN version of PHP autoconf 2.13 seems like the prefered
choice:
If i don't misunderstand the article (http://www.php.net/svn.php), it
seems they are referring to the stock GNU version of autoconf 2.13as
there's no copy of autoconf on php's svn server. We should be fine using
our debian autoconf2.13 package as its taken from the official GNU
sources. Since you
Hmm, just realized that my last sentence wasn't entirely clear. I was
refering what the SVN version of PHP prefers. So yes, our autoconf2.13
is what I guess we should use.
--
karmic: Compiling php fails with autoconf 2.64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411890
You received this bug notification
Setting status back to Triaged.
@dreamcat4: The Fix commited status is usually set by a developer,
once they have uploaded the debdiff (No, PPA doesn't count). In
progress is another status also usually reserved for developers.
** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Triaged
@dreamcat4: Thanks for doing all the research and actual thinking in
this matter!
Making autoconf2.13 an explicit build dependency (instead of merely
autoconf) does make php5 build nicely. I generated new source packages
with this change, and built it without any trouble inside a pbuilder
chroot.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Andreas Olssonandr...@arrakis.se wrote:
autoconf) does make php5 build nicely. I generated new source packages
with this change, and built it without any trouble inside a pbuilder
chroot.
Well, this is fantastic. I've been puzzled and frustrated over this
error
** Attachment added: php5_5.2.10.dfsg.1-1ubuntu2.debdiff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/3049/php5_5.2.10.dfsg.1-1ubuntu2.debdiff
--
karmic: Compiling php fails with autoconf 2.64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Also, according to the (not entirely new) comment to
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=46744
Even using the SVN version of PHP autoconf 2.13 seems like the prefered
choice: http://www.php.net/svn.php
** Bug watch added: bugs.php.net/ #46744
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=46744
--
karmic:
Ok, let me try again...
Also, according to the (not entirely new) comment to
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=46744 autoconf 2.13 it sounds as if 2.13
is the only supported version of autoconf.
Even using the SVN version of PHP autoconf 2.13 seems like the prefered
choice:
If i don't misunderstand the article (http://www.php.net/svn.php), it
seems they are referring to the stock GNU version of autoconf 2.13as
there's no copy of autoconf on php's svn server. We should be fine using
our debian autoconf2.13 package as its taken from the official GNU
sources. Since you
** Tags added: verification-done
** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Committed
--
karmic: Compiling php fails with autoconf 2.64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Hmm, just realized that my last sentence wasn't entirely clear. I was
refering what the SVN version of PHP prefers. So yes, our autoconf2.13
is what I guess we should use.
--
karmic: Compiling php fails with autoconf 2.64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411890
You received this bug notification
Setting status back to Triaged.
@dreamcat4: The Fix commited status is usually set by a developer,
once they have uploaded the debdiff (No, PPA doesn't count). In
progress is another status also usually reserved for developers.
** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Triaged
Notifying Andrew Mitchell
Andrew can we get some people to take a look at this? Its a stopper for
[needs-packaging] php-fpm
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397721
--
karmic: Compiling php fails with autoconf 2.64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411890
You received this bug notification
I can confirm this bug, based on my own experiences noted in bug
#409775.
** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
karmic: Compiling php fails with autoconf 2.64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Hi,
imho karmic is an intermediary release so we should think about pushing php
5.3.x into it.
Also having php 5.3.x in karmic, will allow us get it more stable for the next
LTS.
More than this, php 5.2.9 is already in Debian testing, so moving up to
5.3.0 would be somehow synced with them.
--
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/i386/autoconf
This page says:
This version of autoconf is not compatible with scripts meant for
Autoconf 2.13 or earlier. If you need support for such scripts,
you must also install the autoconf2.13 package.
If you choose install autoconf2.13 package in
** Summary changed:
- karmic: configure fails with cat: confdefs.h: No such file or directory
+ karmic: Compiling php fails with autoconf 2.64
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: php5
- On a fresh 9.10 (karmic) system, php5 (5.2.10) source package will not
- compile.
+ On a fresh
Notifying Andrew Mitchell
Andrew can we get some people to take a look at this? Its a stopper for
[needs-packaging] php-fpm
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397721
--
karmic: Compiling php fails with autoconf 2.64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411890
You received this bug notification
I can confirm this bug, based on my own experiences noted in bug
#409775.
** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
karmic: Compiling php fails with autoconf 2.64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411890
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Hi,
imho karmic is an intermediary release so we should think about pushing php
5.3.x into it.
Also having php 5.3.x in karmic, will allow us get it more stable for the next
LTS.
More than this, php 5.2.9 is already in Debian testing, so moving up to
5.3.0 would be somehow synced with them.
--
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/i386/autoconf
This page says:
This version of autoconf is not compatible with scripts meant for
Autoconf 2.13 or earlier. If you need support for such scripts,
you must also install the autoconf2.13 package.
If you choose install autoconf2.13 package in
33 matches
Mail list logo
