The two Ubuntu versions 9.10 (karmic) and 10.04 (lucid), that are
mentioned in this bug reached its end-of-life.
Ubuntu 10.04 (lucid) reached end-of-life on May 9, 2013.
Ubuntu 9.10 (karmic) reached end-of-life on April 30, 2011.
See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://
** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed
--
coreutils: du(1) doesn't summarize correctly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing l
This appears to be resolved in U10.04. For vboxsf file systems at least.
Not sure about encryptfs.
rro...@u10:/media/Mediazone$ du -sh s14r11
5.8Gs14r11 < --- same in NAutilus as well as
on the Windows 7 host
rro...@u10:/media/Mediazone$ df -h .
Filesystem
** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
coreutils: du(1) doesn't summarize correctly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Have the same on 9.10, also use an encrypted home
--
coreutils: du(1) doesn't summarize correctly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubunt
can reproduce this issue on a current karmic:
c...@n:~/Pictures$ du -shL *
16K Picasa Exports
c...@n:~/Pictures$ du -shL --apparent-size *
10M Picasa Exports
c...@n:~/Pictures$ uname -a
Linux n 2.6.31-17-generic #54-Ubuntu SMP Thu Dec 10 17:01:44 UTC 2009 x86_64
GNU/Linux
du (GNU coreuti
In my particular case the problem is that coreutils probably picks none
or the wrong value for ST_NBLOCKS for the VBOXSF file system. I looked
at the du source in the coreutils-7.4 source and it appears like
ST_NBLOCKS are not getting set. Problem is most likely in system.h
where ST_NBLOCKS shoul
Update. This bug exists in du. I should add this is a virtualbox
mounted folder shared from the local host. However Nautilus and ls has
the sizes correct so I don't think it matters that it is a virtualbox
mount.
rro...@u910:/media/mediazone$ uname -a
Linux u910 2.6.31-11-generic #36-Ubuntu SMP
I have tested on same system with all local files and do not see an
issue. I will circle back to a similar test where I used a SMB
mount(see my comment on 2009-08-21) and test again.
r...@u910-64:~# uname -a
Linux U910-64 2.6.31-10-generic #35-Ubuntu SMP Tue Sep 22 17:33:14 UTC 2009
x86_64 GNU/
1. what type of filesystem is this?
Information from 'mount -v':
...
/dev/sda12 on /home type ext3 (rw,relatime)
...
/home/username/.Private on /home/username type ecryptfs
(ecryptfs_sig=60cc62a1039711h8,ecryptfs_fnek_sig=3257a12b81aff999,ecryptfs_cipher=aes,ecryptfs_key_bytes=16)
So, it's an en
Right now, no idea. Time to dig in.
1. what type of filesystem is this?
2. is it local or remote?
3. does it happen on other directories/FSs?
4. can you copy it to another place, and test again?
--
coreutils: du(1) doesn't summarize correctly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416981
You received t
I checked what Nautilus says about the size of the folder and it still
says by its original output:
"2,966 items, totalling 54.0 MB"
So even if du now shows more than just 4MB, more than 70MB are still off
the mark.
Something is very wrong here.
--
coreutils: du(1) doesn't summarize correctly
This is certainly weird. Without any changes to the folder in question,
'du -hs' now reports a size of 75M. The result for 'du -hsL' is the
same. The folder or any content within hasn't been touched since I
reported the bug. The only thing that occurred in between were system
restarts and a kernel
Thank you for reporting this bug and helping make Ubuntu better.
I cannot reproduce this issue. I wonder if symbolic links may be part of
the different values shown.
Can you please run 'du -shL'?
Thank you
** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: core
Confirmed in Ubuntu 9.10 32-bit (apt-get upgraded as of 21 August 2009)
1. Windows 7
Folder Size: 3.09 GB (3,322,187,937 bytes)
2. Ubuntu 9.10 using du ( does not look right at all )
rro...@u910:/media/mediazone$ du -sh 2009.TriNations/
397M2009.TriNations/
3. Ubuntu 9.10 using nautilus
7
15 matches
Mail list logo
