[Bug 420019] Re: New upstream version: 0.3

2009-09-12 Thread Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
** Branch linked: lp:~andrewsomething/exaile/karmic -- New upstream version: 0.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 420019] Re: New upstream version: 0.3

2009-09-11 Thread Aren Olson
Hi Andrew, As Steve noted, we are very much non-experts when it comes to debian packaging. The current packaging in the bzr branch is a combination of my half-remembered packaging skills from back when I used to use Ubuntu, and Steve's own inexperienced efforts. Any tips/patches/etc. you can

[Bug 420019] Re: New upstream version: 0.3

2009-09-03 Thread Steve Dodier
ipconsole depends ipython and not inotify, and contextinfo also depends python-imaging (thanks Johannes). -- New upstream version: 0.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

Re: [Bug 420019] Re: New upstream version: 0.3

2009-09-03 Thread Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Steve Dodiersidnio...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Andrew, Do you think that this would be acceptable as a package list ? I think that looks quite a bit cleaner. It allows for users to not have to install dependencies for things they would never use. Certainly better

[Bug 420019] Re: New upstream version: 0.3

2009-08-31 Thread Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
As this is a complete rewrite and we are past Feature Freeze, this would need a exception for Karmic. See: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess#Exceptions%20for%20Universe/Multiverse -- New upstream version: 0.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420019 You received this bug notification

[Bug 420019] Re: New upstream version: 0.3

2009-08-31 Thread Steve Dodier
We already packaged it before FF but there were too many packages, according to the MOTU I talked to. I would just like to say that apparently, the two debian maintainers of exaile (who I never saw in #exaile) considered it a good idea for 0.2.x to put all the plugins into the core package and to

Re: [Bug 420019] Re: New upstream version: 0.3

2009-08-31 Thread Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Steve Dodiersidnio...@gmail.com wrote: We already packaged it before FF but there were too many packages, according to the MOTU I talked to. I would just like to say that I just took a quick look at the package in the PPA, and I see what s/he meant. I certainly

[Bug 420019] Re: New upstream version: 0.3

2009-08-31 Thread Steve Dodier
Hey Andrew, Do you think that this would be acceptable as a package list ? * exaile CORE + alarmclock amazoncovers audioscrobbler bookmarks desktopcover lastfmcovers lastfmdynamic librivox massstorage minimode mpris multialarmclock podcasts replaygain shoutcast tagcovers notify notifyosd

[Bug 420019] Re: New upstream version: 0.3

2009-08-31 Thread Steve Dodier
Sidenote : the description of the package also needs to be rewritten. -- New upstream version: 0.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 420019] Re: New upstream version: 0.3

2009-08-27 Thread Jochen Kemnade
the exaile developers have setup a ppa at https://launchpad.net/~exaile- devel/+archive/ppa, which also contains karmic packages. -- New upstream version: 0.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to