[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2010-01-07 Thread Alvin
ok, the error message issue is reported as bug 504224. -- NFS not mounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431248 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubun

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-12-30 Thread raliegh
I was having a difficult time getting a root over nfs system to boot after several attempts to distro upgrade to 9.10. Having it explicitly stated that nfs core mounts are not broken, I gave it a few more tries, but finally today got 9.10 booting by first doing a fresh install and full update onto

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-12-30 Thread Steve Langasek
Alvin, Please file a separate bug report against mountall for this. -- NFS not mounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431248 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com http

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-12-30 Thread Alvin
Maybe they don't, but there's definitely a difference. I quote a boot with NFS mounted /home mount.nfs4: DNS resolution failed for leto: Name or service not known mountall: mount /home [901] terminated with status 32 mountall: Filesystem could not be mounted: /home One or more of the mounts listed

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-12-22 Thread Steve Langasek
The changes in karmic /don't/ break the ability to mount core filesystems via nfs shares. -- NFS not mounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431248 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-12-22 Thread raliegh
Steve Langasek wrote "It is a design decision that a missing /home blocks the boot; this is unlikely to be changed." So what about folks who boot root over nfs? If the changes in Karmic break systems with core filesystems mounted via nfs shares, what is the logic of the "design decision"? -- NFS

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-11-10 Thread Alvin
Yes, this one is fixed. I think the bug you're looking for is Bug #461133. It has similar symptoms. (crashing the boot process if you mount /home over NFS.) -- NFS not mounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431248 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-11-09 Thread Steve Langasek
You've followed up to a bug that has already been fixed. If you think there's still a problem, you should file a new bug report. -- NFS not mounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431248 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-11-09 Thread flowerdealer
We also have this problem, it is really annoying, as boot takes quite a long time. Any fix for it coming soon? -- NFS not mounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431248 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mail

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-10-14 Thread Steve Langasek
John, It is a design decision that a missing /home blocks the boot; this is unlikely to be changed. However, with the latest mountall, you can opt to mark your /home filesystem with the 'nobootwait' option, indicating to mountall not to wait for this before proceeding with the boot. Problems wit

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-10-14 Thread l8gravely
Quick update, I rebooted yesterday after doing a bunch of updates, into linux kernel 2.6.32-rc3 (my own compiled version) and it hung on bootup again, not being able to mount /home and /local via NFS. It sat there for *hours* since I did the reboot remotely. It would be really much nicer if moun

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-10-10 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Jonas, No, your issue is probably not related to bug #447654. I believe your problem is fixed with the latest upload of nfs-utils, which arranges for statd to be started (if not already running) whenever we are asked to mount an NFS filesystem. nfs-utils (1:1.2.0-2ubuntu5) karmic; urgency=lo

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-10-10 Thread Jonas Bonn
I have a hunch that the resolution to bug #447654 will also resolve the issue that I reported above as a "timing issue". Can't test until Monday, though, so I'll get back with more info then. -- NFS not mounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431248 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-10-05 Thread Jonas Bonn
There's still a problem somewhere... seems to be a timing issue. Occasionally NFS mount still fails because rpc.statd is not running yet happens about half the time. I'll attach a screenshot. ** Attachment added: "Screenshot of failure to mount due to rpc.statd not running" http://launch

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-10-04 Thread l8gravely
Thanks for the fixes, reboots when /home or other filesystems are mounted via NFS now works properly. I still see a bunch of errors on startup, but they must be ignored or re-tried. Maybe I'll see how it works when the network is unplugged on bootup, whether it hangs the system still or not. Tha

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-10-02 Thread Steve Langasek
Yes, this upgrade issue has been reported as bug #441055, and a fix is in progress (will be uploaded as version -2ubuntu2). -- NFS not mounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431248 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubu

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-10-02 Thread Douglas Thrift
I'm seeing configuration errors after upgrading to this new version: Setting up nfs-common (1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1) ... * Stopping NFS common utilities ...done. Removing any system startup links for /etc/init.d/nfs-common ... /etc/rc0.d/K20nfs-common /etc/rc1.d/K20nfs-common /etc/rc2.d/S20

Re: [Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-10-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 02:09:38AM -, l8gravely wrote: > I must be stupid, but I don't see the nfs-utils package anywhere. I did > install nfs-kernel-server package, which is now at version: nfs-kernel- > server/karmic uptodate 1:1.2.0-2 > But it didn't make any difference. NFS directories d

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-10-02 Thread l8gravely
I must be stupid, but I don't see the nfs-utils package anywhere. I did install nfs-kernel-server package, which is now at version: nfs-kernel- server/karmic uptodate 1:1.2.0-2 But it didn't make any difference. NFS directories don't mount properly on bootup still. And I've done a full update a

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-10-02 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/nfs-utils -- NFS not mounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431248 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/li

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-10-02 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/portmap -- NFS not mounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431248 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/list

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-10-02 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package nfs-utils - 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 --- nfs-utils (1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low * Drop nfs-common init script in favor of new upstart jobs. LP: #431248. * Build-depend on debhelper (>= 7.3.15ubuntu3) for correct upstart init handling. * D

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-10-02 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package portmap - 6.0-10ubuntu1 --- portmap (6.0-10ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low * Convert portmap to upstart. LP: #431248. -- Steve LangasekTue, 29 Sep 2009 09:27:48 + ** Changed in: portmap (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: Triaged => Fix Released

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-09-30 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu Karmic) Milestone: ubuntu-9.10-beta => ubuntu-9.10 ** Changed in: portmap (Ubuntu Karmic) Milestone: ubuntu-9.10-beta => ubuntu-9.10 ** Changed in: portmap (Ubuntu Karmic) Assignee: Scott James Remnant (scott) => Steve Langasek (vorlon) -- NFS not m

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-09-30 Thread Steve Langasek
Updated nfs-utils patch superseding the previous, now with bugs shaken out so upstart is able to actually manage the jobs. :) ** Attachment added: "nfs-utils-431248.patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32763198/nfs-utils-431248.patch ** Attachment removed: "nfs-utils-431248.patch" http://la

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-09-30 Thread Steve Langasek
And here is a patch for the nfs-common side of things. This is dependent on debhelper and upstart changes so that we get sensible restart-after-upgrade behavior for these services. The problem of when to stop the service is also not completely solved here and needs more attention. ** Attachment

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-09-29 Thread Steve Langasek
Here's a preliminary patch to upstartify portmap. The 'stopped nfs-common' is incorrect, both because there are multiple daemons involved with nfs-common that will each need their own upstart job (AFAICS), and because it should be stopped in cases where nfs-common is not available. Also, this ups

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-09-28 Thread l8gravely
Ooops, I'm a moron. When I have /local enabled in my /etc/fstab, it does NOT mount properly, but the mount process doesn't hang either. It's complains about rpc.statd not being started properly, but I need to enable bootlogd and do some testing to get better logs of the boot process and what happ

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-09-28 Thread l8gravely
I've run into this issue too, but I mount two paths from my home NFS server, which is a Debian Testing box. I mount /home and /local. If I comment out /home from my /etc/fstab, but leave in /local, the system will boot. But if I put in just /home, or both /home and /local, then it won't boot pro

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-09-24 Thread Scott James Remnant
Note that mountall is just here for tracking, the fix is needed for the nfs and portmap packages ** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu Karmic) Milestone: ubuntu-9.10-beta => None -- NFS not mounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431248 You received this bug notification because you are a member o

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-09-23 Thread sancelot
same problem after migration in a "standard" computer it seems to be a bad order in the boot sequence nfs is not mounted at boot time I have to launch /etc/init.d/nfs-common restart and mount manually -- NFS not mounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431248 You received this bug notificatio

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-09-21 Thread Scott James Remnant
** Also affects: nfs-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu Karmic) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu Karmic) Milestone: None => ubuntu-

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-09-18 Thread Rick Spencer
** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu Karmic) Milestone: None => ubuntu-9.10-beta -- NFS not mounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431248 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-09-17 Thread Robbie Williamson
** Also affects: mountall (Ubuntu Karmic) Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu Karmic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Scott James Remnant (scott) ** Tags added: ubuntu-boot -- NFS not mounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431248 You received this bug noti

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-09-17 Thread stefand
Well, I don't really need this network drive at boot time. After all, it's the home directory. I didn't change anything in the boot process. I largly lack the skill to do so. It's just a plain Karmic install and update. My system might be a bit unusual though. I boot it from an SSD, which gives m

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-09-17 Thread andre
Same problem with NFS mountpoints from fstab here. Upon booting the message "couldn't resolve " appears. After that, nfs-common, and thus rpc.statd, is started, so it looks like mountall is a) running too early in the boot process or b) requires a 2nd run when requirements are fulfilled -- NFS

[Bug 431248] Re: NFS not mounted

2009-09-17 Thread Scott James Remnant
The problem isn't so much that mountall doesn't mount them, but it seems to be related to portmap and nfs-common services. Since your NFS mount is one that mountall considers required for boot, it will wait for it before allowing the boot to proceed. ** Summary changed: - nfs not resolved in fst