How many packages are we talking about and have they all been
tested/have working packages?
--
FTBFS? (Perhaps upgrade to gEDA 1.6.0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444527
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
hm, since we're a few hours before FinalFreeze, and can't sync 1.6 from
unstable, I doubt we'll manage to package up all of the new versions of
the geda stack in time, leaving us only with patching 1.4 :/
--
FTBFS? (Perhaps upgrade to gEDA 1.6.0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444527
You
This bug was fixed in the package geda-gattrib - 1:1.4.3-2ubuntu1
---
geda-gattrib (1:1.4.3-2ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low
[ Peter Clifton ]
* Fix FTBFS by removing GtkItemEntry code. Use plain GtkEntry instead.
[ Stefan Potyra ]
* Add dpatch to build-depends in
Thanks Stefan,
Your help ingetting this fixed is much appreciated.
Best wishes,
Peter Clifton
--
FTBFS? (Perhaps upgrade to gEDA 1.6.0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444527
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Hi Peter,
Am Sunday 25 October 2009 05:28:29 schrieb Peter Clifton:
Thanks Stefan,
Your help ingetting this fixed is much appreciated.
well, uploading it was trivial! Thanks to you for providing the fix and even
more for your work on geda in the first place!
Cheers,
Stefan.
--
FTBFS?
Yeah peter,
I was also taking a look at the unified tarball and I installed it ..
(As EE student m using it from past 4 years and thanks to the whole geda
team... You guys rock!) but here the package is split into different
components... if you say its worthwhile updating whole geda stack then I
Hi guys, I'm sure the rest of the gEDA team would appreciate hearing
those comments (geda-user list?).
W.r.t new geda-gattrib, older *geda-*, I'm pretty sure that gattrib
1.6.0 could not be built against libgeda 1.4.2.
--
FTBFS? (Perhaps upgrade to gEDA 1.6.0)
Hi Peter,
first off, geda is so cool! I'm using it in the faumachine project in
order to have a graphical circuit layout for a (then simulated)
mainboard, which gets converted to c-code (by a slightly modified
tragesym). Thanks a lot for geda!
Now the geda project is spread among a number of
subscribing motu-release for advice :-)
** Changed in: geda-gattrib (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
FTBFS? (Perhaps upgrade to gEDA 1.6.0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444527
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Done peter
Calling in sponsors
Regards
** Changed in: geda-gattrib (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Confirmed
** Changed in: geda-gattrib (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Bhavani Shankar (bhavi) = (unassigned)
--
FTBFS? (Perhaps upgrade to gEDA 1.6.0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444527
You
** Attachment added: debdiff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33217615/geda-gattrib.diff
--
FTBFS? (Perhaps upgrade to gEDA 1.6.0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444527
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
** Attachment added: the diff.gz file
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33217677/geda-gattrib_1.6.0-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
--
FTBFS? (Perhaps upgrade to gEDA 1.6.0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444527
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Attachment added: tar.gz orig file
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33217693/geda-gattrib_1.6.0.orig.tar.gz
--
FTBFS? (Perhaps upgrade to gEDA 1.6.0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444527
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
I'm a little lost as to what the deb-diff was for. The control file
implies that it is a geda-gattrib 1.6.0 release, but I don't think this
would not be possible without updating the rest of the geda-* packages.
gEDA (gschem and gattrib) install their own .desktop files, but I see
the debdiff
I'm just waiting to see that these build on the ppa builder:
https://launchpad.net/~pcjc2/+archive/
--
FTBFS? (Perhaps upgrade to gEDA 1.6.0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444527
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Hi,
Instead of having a brand new set of packages ,wouldn't it be possible to apply
the same fix you mention to actual version in Karmic?
Otherwise, you would need a FFe to allow this package to make their path into
Karmic.
Unsubscribing u-u-s for the moment. Please subscribe again when either
Either solution is possible - I was just thinking that 1.6.0 packages
would have been better tested than applying a big patch to 1.4.x.
--
FTBFS? (Perhaps upgrade to gEDA 1.6.0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444527
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
What a PAIN in the backside!
My 1.6.0 patch didn't apply cleanly, so I back-ported to 1.4.3. Then had
to add patch infrastructure to the geda-gattrib package...
Then couldn't make it work properly (the pacakage needed the equivalent
of an autoreconf - and I'm not sure how to do that and still
** Attachment added: Try this!
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33254066/patch_gattrib_1.4.3.debdiff
--
FTBFS? (Perhaps upgrade to gEDA 1.6.0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444527
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Attachment added: Try this!
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33254067/patch_gattrib_1.4.3.debdiff
--
FTBFS? (Perhaps upgrade to gEDA 1.6.0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444527
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Attachment added: .dsc file
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33262219/geda-gattrib_1.4.3-2.dsc
--
FTBFS? (Perhaps upgrade to gEDA 1.6.0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444527
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Attachment added: The _correct_ .dsc file!
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33262234/geda-gattrib_1.4.3-2ubuntu1.dsc
--
FTBFS? (Perhaps upgrade to gEDA 1.6.0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444527
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Attachment added: diff.gz file
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33262205/geda-gattrib_1.4.3-2ubuntu1.diff.gz
--
FTBFS? (Perhaps upgrade to gEDA 1.6.0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444527
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Perhaps it is time to call in the sponsors again?
As a gEDA developer I'm biased, but I still think seeking a FFe for the
entire of gEDA 1.6.0 would be a more supportable way to go, since the
gEDA developers actually support the 1.6.x series.
But of course.. I'm not impartial.
I've provided code
Hi peter
Which is the offending file?
Regards
--
FTBFS? (Perhaps upgrade to gEDA 1.6.0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444527
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
I ve just prepared a PPA package
Test building
Regards
** Changed in: geda-gattrib (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
FTBFS? (Perhaps upgrade to gEDA 1.6.0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444527
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
gattrib/src/gtkitementry.c is the offending file.
This is the fix applied to gEDA 1.6.0 (remove the offending file and use a
different widget):
http://git.gpleda.org/?p=gaf.git;a=commitdiff;h=78da20ca286eb2f6e518c64dca94b888fc8c19af
The diff won't apply directly, but it should only be build
Sorry.. gattrib/src/gtkitementry_2_2.c
--
FTBFS? (Perhaps upgrade to gEDA 1.6.0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444527
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Okay ll look at it
Assigning
** Changed in: geda-gattrib (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
** Changed in: geda-gattrib (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Bhavani Shankar (bhavi)
--
FTBFS? (Perhaps upgrade to gEDA 1.6.0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444527
You received
29 matches
Mail list logo
