[Bug 446140] Re: regulator issues with 2.6.31 vs 2.6.28 with the same patchset

2010-04-20 Thread Bryan Wu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 567157 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567157 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 567157 regulators enabled at boot and also print error messages at boot. -- regulator issues with 2.6.31 vs 2.6.28 with the same patchset

[Bug 446140] Re: regulator issues with 2.6.31 vs 2.6.28 with the same patchset

2009-10-13 Thread Amit Kucheria
The regulators are basically power supplies. The regulator framework abstracts away the control the these power supplies. It allows us to switch off power supplies when a particular device is not in use (to save power). If the regulators are not initialised, the connected peripheral won't work.

[Bug 446140] Re: regulator issues with 2.6.31 vs 2.6.28 with the same patchset

2009-10-13 Thread Loïc Minier
With the current in archive kernel I was getting: r...@babbage20:~# dmesg |grep regu regulator: core version 0.5 mxc_dvfs_core_probe: failed to get gp regulator mxc_cpufreq_driver_init: failed to get gp regulator regulator: get() with no identifier regulator: get() with no identifier regulator:

[Bug 446140] Re: regulator issues with 2.6.31 vs 2.6.28 with the same patchset

2009-10-13 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux-fsl-imx51 - 2.6.31-105.14 --- linux-fsl-imx51 (2.6.31-105.14) karmic; urgency=low [ Andy Whitcroft ] * rebase to Ubuntu-2.6.31-14.46 * [Config] update configs since rebase to Ubuntu-2.6.31-14.46 * lirc update dropped module

[Bug 446140] Re: regulator issues with 2.6.31 vs 2.6.28 with the same patchset

2009-10-10 Thread Brad Figg
** Changed in: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Karmic) Assignee: (unassigned) = Brad Figg (brad-figg) -- regulator issues with 2.6.31 vs 2.6.28 with the same patchset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446140 You received

[Bug 446140] Re: regulator issues with 2.6.31 vs 2.6.28 with the same patchset

2009-10-09 Thread Loïc Minier
Can someone explain what the consequences of this bug are? -- regulator issues with 2.6.31 vs 2.6.28 with the same patchset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446140 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 446140] Re: regulator issues with 2.6.31 vs 2.6.28 with the same patchset

2009-10-09 Thread Brad Figg
We don't know that this is an issue. However this could be why we are still having issues with the RTC. It's just very suspicious. -- regulator issues with 2.6.31 vs 2.6.28 with the same patchset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446140 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 446140] Re: regulator issues with 2.6.31 vs 2.6.28 with the same patchset

2009-10-09 Thread Brad Figg
What I've found out so far is all the regulators are failing to properly initialise. I'm looking into why. -- regulator issues with 2.6.31 vs 2.6.28 with the same patchset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446140 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is