[Bug 446245] Re: lzma more efficient than gzip

2010-08-10 Thread Till Kamppeter
My suggestion of comment #2 is now implemented. I have mentored Vitor Baptista in the Google Summer of Code 2010 exactly for this. He finished it today and I applied it to the openprinting-ppds and openprinting- ppds-extra packages in Maverick, saving near 30 MB in an installed system. I will do

[Bug 446245] Re: lzma more efficient than gzip

2010-08-10 Thread Jérôme
Great. Thank Vitor and Till for your effort. -- lzma more efficient than gzip https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446245 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 446245] Re: lzma more efficient than gzip

2009-11-02 Thread Jérôme
Maybe a driver cache would avoid cups to decompress each time. -- lzma more efficient than gzip https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446245 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 446245] Re: lzma more efficient than gzip

2009-10-21 Thread Jérôme
Mike from Cups team replied to my request that LZMA as a format has also not been standardized like GZIP/Flate, so we'd want to make sure that issue is covered before we adopt it. -- lzma more efficient than gzip https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446245 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 446245] Re: lzma more efficient than gzip

2009-10-08 Thread Jérôme
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33292791/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33292792/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Locale.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33292793/Locale.txt ** Attachment added:

[Bug 446245] Re: lzma more efficient than gzip

2009-10-08 Thread Till Kamppeter
** Changed in: foomatic-db (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: foomatic-db (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- lzma more efficient than gzip https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446245 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 446245] Re: lzma more efficient than gzip

2009-10-08 Thread Till Kamppeter
First, this is a feature request and therefore I have marked it Wishlist. As this feature request is not about the packaging and installation of foomatic-db but about its core functionality I recommend to report this upstream, in this case on http://buga.linuxfoundation.org/, for the product

[Bug 446245] Re: lzma more efficient than gzip

2009-10-08 Thread Jérôme
Thanks for your feedback. I posted a feature request for lzma compression to the cups project: http://www.cups.org/str.php?L3369 For the PPD generator solution, I think that it is a kind of file system implementation with less performance since the PPD generator would have to read the whole tar